What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

When moving a site, use 301 redirects instead of removal tools, as the latter do not affect indexing and could remove pages before the new content is indexed.
29:35
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 58:29 💬 EN 📅 30/11/2018 ✂ 19 statements
Watch on YouTube (29:35) →
Other statements from this video 18
  1. 1:05 Les images uniques influencent-elles vraiment votre visibilité dans Google Images ?
  2. 1:35 Les images impactent-elles vraiment le classement dans les résultats de recherche web ?
  3. 2:08 Les attributs alt d'images sont-ils vraiment déterminants pour votre référencement Google ?
  4. 3:40 Pourquoi Google explore-t-il des pages sans les indexer ?
  5. 4:44 Peut-on vraiment utiliser du texte en français dans les balises de géolocalisation d'images pour le SEO local ?
  6. 6:13 Faut-il vraiment soumettre à l'indexation après avoir corrigé ses données structurées ?
  7. 7:20 Peut-on vraiment agréger les avis tiers sur son site sans risquer une pénalité ?
  8. 9:26 Pourquoi votre Knowledge Panel affiche-t-il des données incorrectes ?
  9. 11:41 La recherche vocale est-elle vraiment un facteur de classement à part entière ?
  10. 13:25 Comment gérer les interstitiels d'âge sans bloquer l'indexation Google ?
  11. 15:27 Les scores de qualité Google Ads influencent-ils vraiment votre référencement naturel ?
  12. 17:20 Les liens sortants améliorent-ils vraiment le classement de vos pages ?
  13. 19:31 Les avis clients en JavaScript doivent-ils être balisés en données structurées ?
  14. 24:06 Pourquoi vos pages JavaScript mettent-elles des semaines à être indexées ?
  15. 27:57 Le crawl de Googlebot depuis les États-Unis pénalise-t-il vraiment votre vitesse de chargement ?
  16. 33:29 Redirections 301 ou canoniques : quelle différence réelle pour un transfert de catégorie ?
  17. 45:44 L'indexation mobile-first exige-t-elle vraiment une parité stricte entre mobile et desktop ?
  18. 56:48 Comment gagner face à des concurrents dominants en SEO sans s'épuiser sur les requêtes ultra-compétitives ?
📅
Official statement from (7 years ago)
TL;DR

John Mueller says: during a migration, always prioritize 301 redirects over Google's removal tools. The latter do not manage indexing transfer and may remove your old pages before the new content is indexed, creating a catastrophic void. 301 redirects ensure a smooth transition and preserve your accumulated SEO capital.

What you need to understand

Why does Google caution against removal tools during migration?

The Google Search Console removal tools are designed to temporarily remove unwanted content (duplicate pages, sensitive content, errors). They do not transfer anything. When you request the removal of a URL, Google removes it outright from its results.

In a migration context, this approach poses a critical timing issue. Your old site disappears from the index before the new one is fully crawled and indexed. The result: a period of void where neither the old nor the new ranks, leading to a potentially drastic drop in traffic.

How do 301 redirects preserve indexing?

A permanent 301 redirect signals to Google that the page has permanently moved to a new address. The engine follows this indication, crawls the new URL, and gradually transfers ranking signals (PageRank, age, backlinks).

This process takes time. Google has to recrawl the old URLs, discover the redirects, validate the new pages, and consolidate the signals. During this phase, the old content remains indexed until the transfer is complete. There is no black hole.

What is the concrete risk of using removal tools?

You create a break in the continuity of your organic presence. The old pages disappear within 24-48 hours after the removal request. If your new site is not indexed yet (which is almost certain right after a migration), you lose all visibility.

Even worse, the accumulated ranking signals on the old URLs are never transferred. You start from scratch on the new domain. The backlinks pointing to the old URLs become obsolete, PageRank dilutes, age disappears. It's a full-scale SEO sabotage.

  • 301 redirects transfer ranking signals, removal tools destroy them
  • The migration timing requires indexing continuity: the old site should be visible until the new one takes over
  • Removal tools create a visibility void lasting several days to several weeks depending on the site's size
  • Google explicitly recommends 301 redirects for any domain, protocol (HTTP to HTTPS), or URL structure migration
  • A removal is reversible but the re-indexing delay can be long, worsening traffic loss

SEO Expert opinion

Is this recommendation really applied in practice?

Yes, and the figures of failed migrations regularly confirm it. There are still sites that lose 40 to 60% of their organic traffic after migration, often because the redirects were incomplete, poorly configured, or... absent. Some webmasters do indeed use the removal tools out of ignorance, thinking they are 'cleaning' the old site.

The confusion arises from the fact that Google offers several tools in Search Console: URL removal, address change, URL parameters. The address change is the right tool to notify a domain migration, but it does NOT replace server-side 301 redirects. It simply speeds up discovery by Google.

In which specific cases are 301 redirects insufficient?

When the site structure changes radically. If you go from 10,000 product pages to 3,000 consolidated category pages, you cannot map each old URL to a new equivalent. Some redirects will need to point to more generic pages, which dilutes signals.

Another scenario: multi-phase migrations. If you migrate in sections (first the blog, then product sheets, then institutional pages), you create a temporary hybrid architecture. Google may get confused, especially if the redirects are not perfectly consistent between phases.

Note: A chain of redirects (A → B → C) dilutes the transmitted PageRank. Google follows up to 5 jumps but recommends just 1 level. If your migration creates chains, clean them up quickly.

What is the actual duration of signal transfer via 301?

Google mentions 'a few weeks to a few months' depending on the site's crawl frequency. On a site crawled daily with a good crawl budget, the main transfer occurs within 2 to 4 weeks. However, complete consolidation can take 3 to 6 months. [To be verified]: no precise official figure has ever been given by Google on the exact transfer rate of PageRank via 301.

In practice, it is observed that high-traffic pages are reprioritized quickly, while deep or less crawled pages take months. This is why it is important to submit a complete XML sitemap of the new site as soon as the switch occurs, to accelerate discovery.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you implement for a successful migration?

First, map each URL from the old site to its new destination. An Excel table with old URL | new URL | HTTP code is the minimum requirement. For sites with more than 1,000 pages, automate the URL extraction via Screaming Frog or equivalent.

Next, configure 301 redirects on the server side (.htaccess for Apache, nginx.conf for Nginx, IIS rules for Windows Server). Never use JavaScript or meta refresh redirects, Google follows them but with less guaranteed signal transfer. HTTP 301s are the gold standard.

What critical mistakes should be absolutely avoided?

Never let the old URLs return 404s after migration. This is the classic mistake: the new site is live, the old pages are removed, but the redirects are not (all) configured. Result: a hemorrhage of 404s that destroys organic traffic.

Do not redirect everything to the homepage. Some webmasters set up a generic redirect ' * → / ' thinking it simplifies matters. Google detects this practice (soft 404) and considers that the content has disappeared. Each old URL should point to its closest thematic equivalent.

How can you check if the migration is going correctly?

Monitor three metrics in Search Console: indexed pages (should gradually transfer from the old to the new domain), 404 errors (should remain marginal), and organic clicks (may temporarily decrease by 10-20% but should stabilize within 4 weeks).

Use the URL Inspection tool to test key URLs: Google should display the new URL as canonical and mention "Redirected" in the crawl history. If the old URL remains the canonical version 3 weeks after migration, something is wrong with your configuration.

  • Extract all URLs from the old site (XML sitemap + complete crawl)
  • Create a complete mapping old URL → new URL
  • Configure 301 redirects on the server (not JavaScript)
  • Declare the address change in Google Search Console (if domain migration)
  • Submit the XML sitemap of the new site immediately after switching
  • Monitor 404s, indexing, and organic traffic for at least 6 weeks
301 redirects are the only reliable mechanism for migrating a site without losing SEO capital. Removal tools destroy indexing without transferring it, creating a catastrophic void. A migration requires rigorous mapping, impeccable technical configuration, and close monitoring over several weeks. If your infrastructure is complex (multilingual site, hybrid architecture, several tens of thousands of URLs), the assistance of a specialized SEO agency can be crucial to avoid costly mistakes and secure the transfer of your organic positions.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Les redirections 302 temporaires peuvent-elles être utilisées pour une migration ?
Non. Une 302 signale un déplacement temporaire, Google conserve donc l'ancienne URL dans l'index et ne transfère pas les signaux de ranking. Utilisez exclusivement des 301 pour toute migration définitive.
Combien de temps faut-il conserver les redirections 301 après une migration ?
Au minimum un an, idéalement indéfiniment. Les backlinks continuent de pointer vers les anciennes URLs pendant des années. Supprimer les redirections trop tôt réactive des 404 et fait perdre du PageRank.
Peut-on utiliser l'outil de changement d'adresse sans configurer de redirections 301 ?
Non, c'est insuffisant. L'outil de changement d'adresse dans Search Console ne remplace pas les redirections serveur. Il accélère simplement la découverte du nouveau domaine par Google, mais les redirections 301 restent obligatoires pour transférer les signaux.
Que faire si on a déjà utilisé les outils de suppression par erreur ?
Annulez immédiatement les demandes de suppression dans Search Console (section Suppressions > Annuler la demande). Configurez les redirections 301 en urgence. Le trafic mettra 2 à 4 semaines à se rétablir partiellement, mais certains signaux seront perdus.
Les redirections 301 transfèrent-elles 100% du PageRank ?
Google a longtemps parlé d'une légère dilution, mais depuis 2016, Matt Cutts a confirmé qu'une 301 transfère le même PageRank qu'un lien interne classique. En pratique, le transfert est quasi-total si la redirection est directe (pas de chaîne).
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO Redirects

🎥 From the same video 18

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 30/11/2018

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.