What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

PageRank is transmitted between the original URL and the final destination during redirects. Chain redirects are not ideal as they increase latency and complexity. Google tracks up to five consecutive redirects before needing to recrawl.
1:43
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h04 💬 EN 📅 29/07/2016 ✂ 10 statements
Watch on YouTube (1:43) →
Other statements from this video 9
  1. 4:43 Les refonte et redirections massives tuent-elles vraiment votre visibilité SEO ?
  2. 4:50 Faut-il soumettre un sitemap temporaire avec les anciennes et nouvelles URL lors d'une migration ?
  3. 6:25 Les redirections 3xx font-elles vraiment perdre du PageRank ?
  4. 7:45 Faut-il vraiment renvoyer un 404 sur vos pages de contenu expiré plutôt que rediriger vers l'accueil ?
  5. 13:27 Faut-il vraiment mettre du nofollow sur tous les liens d'affiliation ?
  6. 19:43 Faut-il vraiment utiliser rel=canonical pendant un test A/B ?
  7. 38:08 Pourquoi votre nombre de pages indexées ne correspond jamais au total de vos URL ?
  8. 53:28 Le texte en bas de page aide-t-il vraiment votre SEO ou Google l'ignore-t-il ?
  9. 61:36 Faut-il vraiment héberger son blog SEO sur un sous-domaine plutôt que dans le site principal ?
📅
Official statement from (9 years ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that PageRank is fully transferred from the original URL to the final destination during a redirect. Multiple redirect chains degrade performance without a theoretical loss of PageRank, but Google stops crawling after five consecutive redirects. A regular audit of your redirect architecture is necessary to prevent blocking the flow of authority.

What you need to understand

Does PageRank survive 301 and 302 redirects?

Yes, and without theoretical loss. Contrary to a persistent misconception that circulated until a few years ago, Google fully transmits PageRank during a redirect, whether permanent (301) or temporary (302). This clarification ends years of debate over an alleged "tax" or dilution of SEO juice.

Specifically, if page A has a PageRank of X and redirects to page B, the latter inherits that X. No discount factor is applied to the transfer itself. What changes the game is the speed and technical complexity introduced by multiple redirects, not the volume of authority transmitted.

Why do redirect chains pose problems?

The issue is not so much PageRank but latency and server load. Each hop in the chain adds HTTP delay: the bot must query a server, receive a 3xx response, and then re-query the new URL. Multiply that by five, and you see why Google dislikes these setups.

Another concern is crawling complexity. The budget allocated to your site is wasted on unnecessary back-and-forths. If your architecture forces Googlebot to go through four redirects to access a strategic product page, you've just burned a portion of your crawl quota for... nothing. And Google eventually gives up after five redirects: the final page remains invisible.

What happens after the fifth redirect?

Google stops tracking and must recrawl to try to resolve the chain on a later visit. In other words, if your chain has six redirects, the final page isn’t indexed immediately. It enters a crawl queue, with no guarantee of priority.

You lose time, potential authority (the page remains invisible for several days or weeks), and unnecessarily complicate the bot's life. This is a technical penalty, not algorithmic: your PageRank is patiently waiting somewhere, but no one can access it.

  • PageRank is fully transmitted during 301 and 302 redirects, without theoretical loss.
  • Redirect chains increase latency and consume crawl budget without providing value.
  • Google gives up after five hops and postpones the crawl of the final destination to a later session.
  • No difference in transmission between 301 and 302 in terms of PageRank, even though 301 remains the standard for permanent migrations.
  • Regularly audit your redirects to identify and fix chains before they impact indexing.

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement align with real-world observations?

Overall, yes. Domain migration tests show that 301s effectively transfer authority, and the indexing delays observed after multiple chains align with this five-redirect limit. Clients who have cleaned up their chains often see a bounce in crawled pages and a reduction in the time it takes for new content to be discovered.

However, there's a nuance on one point: the speed of PageRank consolidation. Google does not specify how long it takes for authority to be fully transferred and counted in ranking. A few days? Several weeks? [To be verified] depending on the site's crawl budget and the frequency of bot visits. A niche site crawled twice a month will not see the effects as quickly as a news media outlet.

Do 302 redirects really transmit as much PageRank as 301s?

Google says yes, and empirical data supports this in most cases. But be careful: a 302 indicates a temporary situation. If it remains in place for several months, Google eventually treats it as a de facto 301. The real risk is indexing confusion: which URL should Google prioritize?

In practice, never keep a 302 in long-term production if the intention is permanent. You introduce ambiguity that can delay signal consolidation. The 301 remains the standard, and for good reason: it removes any uncertainty for the bot.

What to do if you inherit a disastrous redirect architecture?

Start by mapping all chains with Screaming Frog or an equivalent crawler. Identify those that exceed two hops (ideally, a single redirect should suffice). Prioritize fixing those that affect high-traffic pages or pages with strong backlink capital: these are the ones that waste the most crawl budget and transit PageRank.

Next, audit your server logs. If Googlebot passes through redirect chains leading to a dead page or a loop ten times a day, you have a structural problem that negatively impacts your SEO far beyond just PageRank transmission. A redesign of the URL architecture may be needed.

Warning: If you break a chain by shortcutting it, ensure that all external backlinks point to the final URL or to a direct redirect. A historical backlink to URL A that redirects to B then to C must be redirected directly from A to C, or you lose crawl time with each visit.

Practical impact and recommendations

How can you identify and fix redirect chains on your site?

Run a full crawl with Screaming Frog enabling redirect tracking. The report will show you all detected chains, their lengths, and the URLs involved. Export the list and filter those that exceed one hop. You can also use tools like OnCrawl or Botify to cross-reference with log data and spot the most crawled chains.

Once you have the list, edit your redirect rules (the .htaccess file, Nginx configuration, or through your CMS) to point the original URL directly to the final destination. Test each modification with a tool like Redirect Mapper or simply using curl from the command line to verify the number of hops.

What mistakes to avoid when cleaning up redirects?

Never delete an active redirect without ensuring it's no longer referenced anywhere (backlinks, XML sitemap, internal linking). A sudden deletion turns a functional link into a 404, resulting in a loss of PageRank and traffic. Use Google Search Console to spot URLs still being crawled before making any changes.

Another trap: creating a new chain while fixing the old one. If you redirect A to C to bypass B, but C itself redirects to D, you haven’t solved anything. Always check the final destination before modifying a rule.

What impact to expect after optimizing redirects?

You should observe a decrease in the number of crawled redirects in your server logs and an increase in the volume of unique pages visited by Googlebot. The released crawl budget can be reallocated to more strategic content. If pages were blocked beyond five hops, they should appear in the index within a few days.

On the ranking side, the effect is indirect but real: less latency, better user experience, and quicker consolidation of PageRank on target pages. Don’t expect a jump of +20 positions overnight, but a gradual improvement in the site's technical health. These technical optimizations can be complex to orchestrate on a large site, especially if the architecture has evolved in successive layers over the years. Engaging a specialized SEO agency can help you avoid costly mistakes and speed up the diagnosis and implementation of fixes.

  • Crawl the entire site to detect redirect chains
  • Prioritize chains affecting high-traffic pages or pages with strong backlink capital
  • Modify redirect rules to point directly to the final destination
  • Test each modification with a redirect tracking tool (curl, Redirect Mapper, etc.)
  • Check that external backlinks and internal linking point to the correct URLs
  • Monitor server logs post-optimization to measure the impact on crawl budget
Redirects transmit PageRank without loss, but multiple chains waste crawl budget and add latency. Google gives up after five hops, making the final pages invisible until the next crawl. Regular audits, methodical cleanup of chains, and log monitoring ensure a clean architecture and optimal authority transfer. Never leave a 302 in place long-term if the intention is permanent, and systematically shortcut chains as soon as they are detected.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Une redirection 302 transmet-elle autant de PageRank qu'une 301 ?
Oui, selon Google. Les deux types de redirections transmettent le PageRank intégralement. La différence réside dans le signal envoyé au moteur : la 301 indique un changement permanent, la 302 un changement temporaire. Si la 302 reste en place trop longtemps, Google peut la traiter comme une 301, mais avec un délai de consolidation.
Combien de redirections en chaîne Google tolère-t-il avant d'abandonner le crawl ?
Google suit jusqu'à cinq redirections consécutives. Au-delà, le bot abandonne et reporte le crawl de la destination finale à une session ultérieure. Votre page reste invisible jusqu'à ce que Google retente, ce qui peut prendre plusieurs jours ou semaines.
Les chaînes de redirections font-elles perdre du PageRank ?
Non, le PageRank lui-même n'est pas dilué par les chaînes. En revanche, elles augmentent la latence, consomment du crawl budget inutilement, et peuvent empêcher l'indexation de la page finale si la chaîne dépasse cinq sauts. Vous perdez du temps et de la visibilité, pas de l'autorité brute.
Faut-il corriger toutes les chaînes de redirections, même celles de deux sauts ?
Idéalement, oui. Chaque saut supplémentaire ajoute de la latence et consomme du crawl budget. Priorisez les chaînes touchant des pages stratégiques ou celles qui dépassent deux sauts. Une architecture propre limite les risques d'erreur et accélère la consolidation du PageRank.
Comment vérifier si mes redirections bloquent l'indexation de certaines pages ?
Crawlez votre site avec Screaming Frog en activant le suivi des redirections, puis croisez avec les données de Google Search Console. Si des URLs importantes n'apparaissent pas dans l'index malgré des backlinks ou un maillage interne actif, vérifiez la longueur de la chaîne de redirections et les logs serveur pour voir si Googlebot abandonne en cours de route.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Crawl & Indexing Links & Backlinks Domain Name Redirects

🎥 From the same video 9

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h04 · published on 29/07/2016

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.