Official statement
Other statements from this video 2 ▾
Google confirms that PageRank sculpting still exists, but its form has evolved. Using nofollow to sculpt the internal PageRank flow is no longer the recommended method. The effective approach now is to intelligently structure the internal link architecture to prioritize strategic pages. In practical terms: less technical manipulation, more editorial prioritization.
What you need to understand
Has PageRank sculpting really disappeared?
No, it has simply taken on a new form. PageRank sculpting refers to techniques aimed at controlling the distribution of SEO juice across a site. The time when placing a nofollow on internal links allowed for redistributing PageRank to other pages is over since Google changed the way this attribute is processed.
Google admits here that this practice can still make sense for login or custom pages, meaning areas without SEO value. But the main point is elsewhere: real sculpting happens through the architecture itself. Less tinkering, more structural strategy.
What does Google mean by 'internal link architecture'?
This refers to how your pages link to each other, creating a link hierarchy that signals to Google which pages are the most important. A page that is accessible with one click from the homepage carries more weight than a page buried five levels deep.
This architecture not only defines the crawl budget allocated to your pages but also the distribution of internal PageRank. If your main navigation points to 20 different categories with the same prominence, you dilute the signal. If you concentrate your links on 5 priority categories, you bolster their authority.
Why is this method more effective than using nofollow?
Since the shift of nofollow from directive to hint in March 2020, Google can choose to ignore or respect this attribute based on its analysis. In other words, you no longer control anything. Using nofollow for sculpting is like rolling the dice with your linking.
Conversely, structuring your architecture sends a clear and powerful signal. Creating a content hub with descending links to satellite pages, limiting the depth of your strategic URLs, avoiding unnecessary links in the footer: these architectural decisions are understood and respected by Google without ambiguity.
- Internal nofollow guarantees nothing since Google has made it just a hint rather than a directive
- The link architecture reflects your editorial strategy and naturally prioritizes your content
- Google values clear signals: the less ambiguity in your structure, the better
- Strategic pages should be accessible in less than 3 clicks from the homepage
- A footer with 80 links dilutes PageRank without providing tangible SEO value
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
Yes, completely. For years, tests have shown that internal nofollow produces erratic results. Some sites have seen improvements by nofollowing their legal pages, while others have noticed no change. The reason? Google now treats nofollow as one signal among others, not as an absolute instruction.
In contrast, sites that have restructured their internal linking — by clustering links to thematic hubs, removing unnecessary footer links, and creating pillar pages with a clear PageRank distribution — have consistently seen gains. It’s no mystery: a clear architecture guides crawling and concentrates authority.
What nuances should be added to this recommendation?
Google remains vague on a critical point: when does internal nofollow remain relevant? The mention of 'login or custom pages' is too vague. Does this include checkout pages, facet filter pages, internal search pages? [To be verified]
In practice, using nofollow on pages without SEO value (client area, search pages, duplicate filters) remains a good defensive practice. Not to sculpt the PageRank — Google might ignore your directive — but to avoid wasting crawl budget on unnecessary URLs. Nofollow then acts as a weak signal, not a powerful lever.
When does this rule not apply?
On sites with very high volumes (millions of pages), architecture alone is not enough. You also need to control crawling via robots.txt, meta robots tags, and sometimes tactical compromises including nofollow. An e-commerce site with 50,000 products and 10,000 filters cannot simply 'well-structure its linking': it must actively block or deprioritize entire sections of the site.
Similarly, sites with strong historical SEO traffic may have pages inheriting powerful but outdated backlinks. In this case, sculpting PageRank through strategic redirects or a linking strategy focused on new priority pages becomes crucial. Google says nothing about these edge cases, typical of its public communication.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do concretely on your site?
First, audit your internal link architecture. Use a crawler (Screaming Frog, Oncrawl, Botify) to map the depth of your strategic pages. If your monetizing pages are 4-5 clicks from the homepage, you have a structural problem. The goal: bring them within 2-3 clicks maximum.
Next, identify unnecessary links: overloaded footer, repetitive sidebar on all pages, secondary navigation that dilutes the signal. Every link you remove from non-strategic areas concentrates PageRank on the links that truly matter. Less is more.
What mistakes should you absolutely avoid?
Don't fall into the trap of over-optimizing with nofollow. Reviewing 10,000 pages to add nofollow to internal links is a waste of time if your architecture remains shaky. Fix the foundations first: category hierarchy, URL depth, content hubs.
Also avoid creating hermetically sealed silos without any cross-linking. Google values semantic connections between complementary content. A blog post can legitimately link to a product page if it's relevant. The architecture is not a prison; it's a prioritization.
How can you check if your internal linking is optimal?
Use Google Search Console to analyze discovered pages and their crawl depth. If strategic pages take weeks to be recrawled, it’s a sign that your architecture marginalizes them. Compare with your business goals: pages that generate revenue should be crawled daily.
Also test the impact of your changes with granular position tracking. After strengthening the linking to a priority category, monitor its ranking changes over 4-6 weeks. If no movement appears, dig deeper: perhaps the content itself needs a redesign or the competition is too strong for the linking alone to make a difference.
- Crawl your site to identify strategic pages more than 3 clicks from the homepage
- Remove unnecessary links from footers and sidebars that dilute PageRank
- Create pillar pages with a clear descending linking to satellite content
- Reserve nofollow for pages without SEO value: client area, internal search, duplicate filters
- Monitor crawl depth in Search Console after each structural change
- Test the impact on rankings for 4 to 6 weeks before adjusting the strategy
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le nofollow interne est-il complètement inutile aujourd'hui ?
Combien de clics maximum entre l'accueil et une page stratégique ?
Faut-il supprimer tous les liens du footer ?
Comment mesurer l'efficacité de mon architecture de liens ?
Les pages profondes peuvent-elles quand même ranker ?
🎥 From the same video 2
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1 min · published on 28/05/2009
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.