Official statement
Other statements from this video 1 ▾
Google completely ignores the meta keywords tag for ranking in its search results, and has done so for several years. This decision comes in response to mass abuses by spammers who stuffed this tag with irrelevant keywords. For SEO practitioners, this means there's no point in wasting time filling out this field: focus your efforts on on-page optimizations that have a real impact.
What you need to understand
Why did Google abandon this tag?
The meta keywords tag was originally designed to help search engines understand the themes of a page. The problem? It was never visible to users, only to bots.
This opacity made it an ideal playground for keyword stuffing. Thousands of sites stuffed this tag with hundreds of unrelated keywords, hoping to manipulate rankings. Therefore, Google made the radical decision to completely disregard it in its ranking algorithm.
Does this tag have an impact on other search engines?
Bing has publicly confirmed that it also does not use this tag for organic ranking. Yandex and Baidu also ignore it for their main results.
Some niche engines or internal corporate indexing tools may still read it, but their market share is negligible. In practice, optimizing this tag is completely useless for actual organic traffic.
What effective alternatives are there to signal keywords to Google?
Google now analyzes visible text content: H1-H6 titles, paragraphs, image alt attributes, internal link anchors. The natural semantics of the text takes precedence over any explicit declaration of keywords.
Structured data from schema.org can also clarify certain concepts, but does not replace rich content. Internal linking with relevant anchors remains one of the most powerful signals to indicate a page's theme.
- The meta keywords tag has been completely ignored by Google for over a decade
- Spammers destroyed its credibility by stuffing it with irrelevant keywords
- No major search engine uses it for organic ranking
- Visible content and internal linking are the real levers for signaling your themes
- Removing this tag from your template will never penalize your SEO
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Absolutely. For years, SEO audits have shown that there is no correlation between the presence of a meta keywords tag and ranking performance. Some sites without this tag rank excellently, while others that meticulously fill it stagnate.
I have even tested removing this tag completely from client sites: zero negative impact, ever. Google does not lie on this point, and it's one of the few areas where its communication is completely transparent and verifiable.
Are there cases where this tag could harm SEO?
Indirectly, yes. If you list competing keywords or third-party brands in this tag, you expose your strategy to competitors who inspect your source code. It's a free information leak.
Some competitive monitoring tools automatically scan these tags to identify the terms targeted by their rivals. There’s no need to make their job easier. Furthermore, filling out this tag takes time that could be invested in visible content or truly impactful technical optimizations.
Why do some CMS still offer this field?
Technical inertia and ignorance. Many legacy CMS (WordPress with certain old themes, Joomla, Drupal 7) still include this field by default in their admin interfaces. Developers never took the time to remove it.
Some SEO plugins also maintain this option for backward compatibility or because their users request it, even though it is useless. Do not confuse the presence of a field in an interface with real usefulness for SEO.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you concretely do with this tag?
If your template still includes it, there are two options: remove it completely from the source code, or leave it empty. Both approaches are equivalent for Google. Removing the code is cleaner and reduces the HTML weight, even if marginally.
If you manage a large site with thousands of pages that automatically generate this tag, don’t waste time cleaning up the history. Focus on new pages and future templates. The SEO impact of this removal is strictly zero, neither positive nor negative.
What on-page optimizations should you prioritize instead?
Invest this time in the title tag (which is crucial), the meta description (for click-through rates), and especially the H1-H2 titles that structure your content. These elements are analyzed and valued by Google.
Also work on your semantic density: use synonyms, related terms, long-tail variations in your paragraphs. This is what Google actually analyzes to understand your topic, not a hidden list of keywords.
How can I quickly audit the use of this tag on my site?
A crawl with Screaming Frog or Oncrawl will tell you in minutes which pages still contain this tag. Filter the URLs, identify the affected templates, and modify them once and for all.
If you use a modern CMS like WordPress with Yoast or Rank Math, check in the plugin settings that this tag is not generated automatically. Most recent plugins have disabled it by default, but some older configurations may keep it active.
- Remove the meta keywords tag from your page templates
- Never waste time filling out this field in your CMS
- Reinvest that effort in title tags, H1, and visible content
- Crawl your site to identify pages that still generate this tag
- Check your SEO plugin settings to disable this feature
- Train your writers and technical teams to completely ignore this field
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
La balise meta keywords peut-elle pénaliser mon site si je la remplis mal ?
Dois-je retirer cette balise de toutes mes pages existantes ?
Yandex ou Bing utilisent-ils encore la meta keywords ?
Cette balise peut-elle servir pour le référencement interne d'un site e-commerce ?
Mes concurrents la remplissent encore, dois-je faire pareil pour rester aligné ?
🎥 From the same video 1
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1 min · published on 21/09/2009
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.