What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

If an entire page is marked as noindex, Google already sees that no signals should be transmitted. Adding the sponsored or nofollow attribute to individual links may help machine learning systems but is not mandatory and does not impact the site itself.
13:13
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h01 💬 EN 📅 15/01/2021 ✂ 27 statements
Watch on YouTube (13:13) →
Other statements from this video 26
  1. 2:11 Comment la position d'un lien dans l'arborescence influence-t-elle vraiment la fréquence de crawl ?
  2. 2:11 Les liens depuis la homepage augmentent-ils vraiment la fréquence de crawl ?
  3. 2:43 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il vos balises title et meta description ?
  4. 3:13 Pourquoi Google réécrit-il vos titres et meta descriptions malgré vos optimisations ?
  5. 4:47 Faut-il vraiment se soucier du crawl HTTP/2 de Google ?
  6. 4:47 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter du passage de Googlebot au crawling HTTP/2 ?
  7. 5:21 HTTP/2 booste-t-il vraiment le crawl budget ou surcharge-t-il simplement vos serveurs ?
  8. 6:21 HTTP/2 améliore-t-il vraiment les Core Web Vitals de votre site ?
  9. 6:27 Le passage à HTTP/2 de Googlebot a-t-il un impact sur vos Core Web Vitals ?
  10. 8:32 L'outil de suppression d'URL empêche-t-il vraiment Google de crawler vos pages ?
  11. 9:02 Pourquoi l'outil de suppression d'URL de Google ne retire-t-il pas vraiment vos pages de l'index ?
  12. 13:38 Les pages en noindex bloquent-elles vraiment la transmission de valeur via leurs liens ?
  13. 16:37 Canonical ou redirection 301 : comment gérer proprement la migration de contenu entre plusieurs sites ?
  14. 26:00 Pourquoi x-default est-il obligatoire sur une homepage avec redirection linguistique ?
  15. 28:34 Faut-il craindre une pénalité SEO en apparaissant dans Google News ?
  16. 31:57 Faut-il vraiment supprimer vos vieux contenus ou les améliorer pour le SEO ?
  17. 32:08 Faut-il vraiment supprimer votre vieux contenu de faible qualité pour améliorer votre SEO ?
  18. 33:22 L'outil de suppression d'URL retire-t-il vraiment vos pages de l'index Google ?
  19. 35:37 Les traits d'union cassent-ils vraiment le matching exact de vos mots-clés ?
  20. 35:37 Les traits d'union dans les URLs et le contenu nuisent-ils vraiment au référencement ?
  21. 38:48 L'API Natural Language de Google reflète-t-elle vraiment le fonctionnement de la recherche ?
  22. 41:49 Pourquoi Google refuse-t-il d'indexer les images sans page HTML parente ?
  23. 42:56 Faut-il vraiment soumettre les pages HTML dans un sitemap images plutôt que les fichiers JPG ?
  24. 45:08 Le duplicate content technique nuit-il vraiment au référencement de votre site ?
  25. 45:41 Le duplicate content technique pénalise-t-il vraiment votre site ?
  26. 53:02 Faut-il détailler chaque URL dans une demande de réexamen après pénalité manuelle ?
📅
Official statement from (5 years ago)
TL;DR

Google states that a page marked as noindex already signals that no signals should be passed: adding nofollow or sponsored to individual links is not mandatory. This directive may assist machine learning systems, but it has no direct impact on site ranking. For SEOs, this simplifies the management of non-indexed pages such as thank-you pages or temporary content.

What you need to understand

What does Mueller's statement really mean?

When a page is marked noindex, Google understands that this content should not be included in its index. This meta tag sends a clear signal: the page exists, but it should not appear in search results.

Mueller emphasizes that this signal is sufficient to indicate that the outgoing links from this page should not transmit signals (such as PageRank). In other words, there’s no need to add rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored" to each link individually — Google already treats the page as non-contributive to the link graph.

Why this distinction between noindex and link attributes?

Historically, SEOs have often combined noindex and nofollow as a precaution, particularly on order confirmation pages, newsletter unsubscribe pages, or temporary content. The idea was to ensure that no juice leaks to low-value URLs.

Mueller's statement suggests that this double protection is redundant from a crawl and indexing standpoint. However, he mentions an ancillary benefit: attributes on individual links can help Google's machine learning systems better understand the nature of the links (commercial, sponsored, etc.).

In what contexts does this rule apply?

This recommendation primarily concerns pages that you never want to appear in the index: confirmation pages, internal administrative pages, private content, or time-limited content.

It does not apply to pages you want to index but for which you wish to carefully control the profile of outgoing links — for example, an editorial page with integrated sponsored mentions. In this case, the rel="sponsored" attribute remains relevant to qualify the nature of the link.

  • A noindex page is sufficient to block the transmission of signals through its outgoing links.
  • Adding nofollow or sponsored to each link is not mandatory but can enrich data for machine learning.
  • This rule simplifies the management of non-indexed pages with no negative impact on the site.
  • Indexable pages with commercial links still require manual qualification of links.
  • Google clearly distinguishes between indexation and signal attribution through links.

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with observed practices in the field?

Yes and no. In most cases, experienced SEOs have found that noindex pages do not actually pass PageRank — this is consistent with what Mueller says. Real-world tests show that outgoing links from a noindex page do not boost target pages.

However, there is a grey area: Mueller talks about assistance to machine learning systems. Which systems exactly? What impact on the semantic understanding of the site, on spam detection, on user behavior modeling? [To be verified] — Google remains vague about the actual extent of this benefit. If it's marginal, it might be best to ignore it. If it's significant for content classification, that changes the game.

When does this rule not apply?

Let’s be honest: if you have an indexable page containing sponsored or affiliate links, the rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow" attribute remains mandatory. It's a matter of compliance with guidelines and respect for Google's anti-spam directives.

Similarly, on temporarily noindex pages (for example, preproduction content that will be indexed later), it may be prudent to qualify the links right now — especially if these pages are frequently crawled and you want to send coherent signals from the start.

Should you reconsider your link markup practices?

Not necessarily. If you already have a strict policy of nofollow on all noindex pages, maintaining it won’t hurt — it's just redundant markup. The time savings from removing these attributes are minimal.

On the other hand, if you are managing a complex site with thousands of noindex pages (e-commerce, SaaS platform, etc.), you can streamline your publishing process by no longer worrying about adding nofollow to every link on a page that is already out of index. It simplifies the editorial and technical workflow.

Warning: this statement does not exempt you from qualifying commercial links on indexable pages. Confusing the two can result in manual or algorithmic penalties.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you practically do on an existing site?

First step: audit your noindex pages and check if you have systematically added nofollow attributes to all their links. If so, you can lighten this layer of markup during the next updates — but it's not urgent.

Second step: focus your efforts on indexable pages with commercial links. Ensure that each sponsored, affiliate, or paid link carries rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow". That's where the real risk lies.

How to check that your site adheres to these best practices?

Use a crawler like Screaming Frog or Oncrawl to list all your noindex pages and their outgoing links. Export the list of link attributes and check that indexable pages with commercial content are properly qualified.

Cross-reference this data with your Google Search Console reports to spot any alerts on non-compliant links. If Google detects a pattern of unmarked sponsored links, you will receive a warning — it's better to be proactive.

What mistakes to avoid in applying this directive?

Classic mistake: believing that noindex exempts you from link management. Just because a page is out of index doesn't mean it can contain any type of link without caution. Outgoing links are still crawled, and Google analyzes their context.

Another pitfall: applying this rule to provisionally noindex pages or pages awaiting validation. If you plan to index the page later, it’s better to properly qualify the links now — this avoids having to go back over all the content.

  • Audit noindex pages and their outgoing link attributes
  • Ensure that all indexable pages with commercial links carry rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow"
  • Do not confuse noindex (indexation) and nofollow (signal transmission)
  • Simplify the editorial workflow by stopping the addition of nofollow to every link on noindex pages
  • Cross-reference crawler data with Search Console alerts on non-compliant links
  • Anticipate Google's developments on machine learning systems and adjust if necessary
This directive simplifies the management of non-indexed pages, but does not exempt you from a rigorous policy of qualifying commercial links on indexable pages. If you manage a site with thousands of pages and complex publishing logic, support from a specialized SEO agency can help you structure a coherent markup strategy, automate checks, and avoid costly visibility errors.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Si une page est noindex, Google crawle-t-il quand même ses liens sortants ?
Oui, Google continue de crawler les liens sortants d'une page noindex. En revanche, il ne transmet pas de PageRank via ces liens, et la page elle-même reste hors index.
Faut-il ajouter nofollow sur les liens d'une page de confirmation de commande en noindex ?
Non, ce n'est pas nécessaire selon Mueller. La balise noindex suffit à signaler que les liens ne doivent pas transmettre de signaux. Ajouter nofollow est redondant.
Quel est l'intérêt d'ajouter quand même sponsored ou nofollow sur une page noindex ?
Cela peut aider les systèmes de machine learning de Google à mieux comprendre la nature des liens, mais l'impact réel reste flou. Ce n'est pas obligatoire et n'affecte pas le classement du site.
Une page noindex peut-elle transmettre du PageRank à ses pages cibles ?
Non. Google considère qu'une page noindex ne doit pas contribuer au graphe de liens. Ses liens sortants ne transmettent donc pas de PageRank.
Dois-je revoir toutes mes pages noindex pour retirer les attributs nofollow ?
Ce n'est pas une priorité. Si vous les avez déjà, les garder ne nuit pas. En revanche, vous pouvez simplifier vos futurs workflows en arrêtant d'ajouter nofollow systématiquement.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO Links & Backlinks

🎥 From the same video 26

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h01 · published on 15/01/2021

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.