Official statement
Other statements from this video 26 ▾
- 2:11 How does the position of a link in the structure really affect crawl frequency?
- 2:11 Do homepage links really boost crawl frequency?
- 2:43 Why does Google ignore your title and meta description tags?
- 3:13 Why does Google rewrite your titles and meta descriptions even with your optimizations?
- 4:47 Should you really be concerned about Google’s HTTP/2 crawling?
- 4:47 Should you really worry about Google's transition to HTTP/2 crawling?
- 5:21 Does HTTP/2 really boost crawl budget or does it just overload your servers?
- 6:21 Does HTTP/2 really enhance your site's Core Web Vitals?
- 6:27 Does the switch to HTTP/2 by Googlebot impact your Core Web Vitals?
- 8:32 Does the URL removal tool really prevent Google from crawling your pages?
- 9:02 Why doesn’t Google's URL removal tool actually take your pages out of its index?
- 13:38 Do noindex pages really block the transmission of value through their links?
- 16:37 How can you effectively manage content migration between multiple sites using Canonical or 301 Redirects?
- 26:00 Is x-default really essential for a homepage with language redirection?
- 28:34 Should you worry about a SEO penalty for being featured in Google News?
- 31:57 Should you really delete your old content or improve it for SEO?
- 32:08 Should you really delete your old low-quality content to boost your SEO?
- 33:22 Does the URL removal tool really take your pages out of Google's index?
- 35:37 Do hyphens really disrupt the exact match of your keywords?
- 35:37 Do hyphens in URLs and content really harm your SEO?
- 38:48 Does Google's Natural Language API truly reflect how search operates?
- 41:49 Why does Google refuse to index images without a parent HTML page?
- 42:56 Should you really include HTML pages in an image sitemap instead of just JPG files?
- 45:08 Does the technical duplicate content issue really harm your site's SEO?
- 45:41 Does technical duplicate content really penalize your site?
- 53:02 Should you detail each URL in a reconsideration request after a manual penalty?
Google states that a page marked as noindex already signals that no signals should be passed: adding nofollow or sponsored to individual links is not mandatory. This directive may assist machine learning systems, but it has no direct impact on site ranking. For SEOs, this simplifies the management of non-indexed pages such as thank-you pages or temporary content.
What you need to understand
What does Mueller's statement really mean?
When a page is marked noindex, Google understands that this content should not be included in its index. This meta tag sends a clear signal: the page exists, but it should not appear in search results.
Mueller emphasizes that this signal is sufficient to indicate that the outgoing links from this page should not transmit signals (such as PageRank). In other words, there’s no need to add rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored" to each link individually — Google already treats the page as non-contributive to the link graph.
Why this distinction between noindex and link attributes?
Historically, SEOs have often combined noindex and nofollow as a precaution, particularly on order confirmation pages, newsletter unsubscribe pages, or temporary content. The idea was to ensure that no juice leaks to low-value URLs.
Mueller's statement suggests that this double protection is redundant from a crawl and indexing standpoint. However, he mentions an ancillary benefit: attributes on individual links can help Google's machine learning systems better understand the nature of the links (commercial, sponsored, etc.).
In what contexts does this rule apply?
This recommendation primarily concerns pages that you never want to appear in the index: confirmation pages, internal administrative pages, private content, or time-limited content.
It does not apply to pages you want to index but for which you wish to carefully control the profile of outgoing links — for example, an editorial page with integrated sponsored mentions. In this case, the rel="sponsored" attribute remains relevant to qualify the nature of the link.
- A noindex page is sufficient to block the transmission of signals through its outgoing links.
- Adding nofollow or sponsored to each link is not mandatory but can enrich data for machine learning.
- This rule simplifies the management of non-indexed pages with no negative impact on the site.
- Indexable pages with commercial links still require manual qualification of links.
- Google clearly distinguishes between indexation and signal attribution through links.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with observed practices in the field?
Yes and no. In most cases, experienced SEOs have found that noindex pages do not actually pass PageRank — this is consistent with what Mueller says. Real-world tests show that outgoing links from a noindex page do not boost target pages.
However, there is a grey area: Mueller talks about assistance to machine learning systems. Which systems exactly? What impact on the semantic understanding of the site, on spam detection, on user behavior modeling? [To be verified] — Google remains vague about the actual extent of this benefit. If it's marginal, it might be best to ignore it. If it's significant for content classification, that changes the game.
When does this rule not apply?
Let’s be honest: if you have an indexable page containing sponsored or affiliate links, the rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow" attribute remains mandatory. It's a matter of compliance with guidelines and respect for Google's anti-spam directives.
Similarly, on temporarily noindex pages (for example, preproduction content that will be indexed later), it may be prudent to qualify the links right now — especially if these pages are frequently crawled and you want to send coherent signals from the start.
Should you reconsider your link markup practices?
Not necessarily. If you already have a strict policy of nofollow on all noindex pages, maintaining it won’t hurt — it's just redundant markup. The time savings from removing these attributes are minimal.
On the other hand, if you are managing a complex site with thousands of noindex pages (e-commerce, SaaS platform, etc.), you can streamline your publishing process by no longer worrying about adding nofollow to every link on a page that is already out of index. It simplifies the editorial and technical workflow.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you practically do on an existing site?
First step: audit your noindex pages and check if you have systematically added nofollow attributes to all their links. If so, you can lighten this layer of markup during the next updates — but it's not urgent.
Second step: focus your efforts on indexable pages with commercial links. Ensure that each sponsored, affiliate, or paid link carries rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow". That's where the real risk lies.
How to check that your site adheres to these best practices?
Use a crawler like Screaming Frog or Oncrawl to list all your noindex pages and their outgoing links. Export the list of link attributes and check that indexable pages with commercial content are properly qualified.
Cross-reference this data with your Google Search Console reports to spot any alerts on non-compliant links. If Google detects a pattern of unmarked sponsored links, you will receive a warning — it's better to be proactive.
What mistakes to avoid in applying this directive?
Classic mistake: believing that noindex exempts you from link management. Just because a page is out of index doesn't mean it can contain any type of link without caution. Outgoing links are still crawled, and Google analyzes their context.
Another pitfall: applying this rule to provisionally noindex pages or pages awaiting validation. If you plan to index the page later, it’s better to properly qualify the links now — this avoids having to go back over all the content.
- Audit noindex pages and their outgoing link attributes
- Ensure that all indexable pages with commercial links carry rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow"
- Do not confuse noindex (indexation) and nofollow (signal transmission)
- Simplify the editorial workflow by stopping the addition of nofollow to every link on noindex pages
- Cross-reference crawler data with Search Console alerts on non-compliant links
- Anticipate Google's developments on machine learning systems and adjust if necessary
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Si une page est noindex, Google crawle-t-il quand même ses liens sortants ?
Faut-il ajouter nofollow sur les liens d'une page de confirmation de commande en noindex ?
Quel est l'intérêt d'ajouter quand même sponsored ou nofollow sur une page noindex ?
Une page noindex peut-elle transmettre du PageRank à ses pages cibles ?
Dois-je revoir toutes mes pages noindex pour retirer les attributs nofollow ?
🎥 From the same video 26
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h01 · published on 15/01/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.