Official statement
Other statements from this video 22 ▾
- 3:03 Les erreurs 404 temporaires lors d'une migration tuent-elles vraiment votre référencement ?
- 4:56 Googlebot crawle depuis les USA : comment éviter le piège du cloaking géo-IP ?
- 8:42 Peut-on vraiment bloquer Googlebot état par état aux USA sans tout casser ?
- 11:31 Pourquoi Google n'indexe-t-il pas toutes vos pages malgré un crawl actif ?
- 14:14 Faut-il systématiquement activer loading='lazy' sur toutes vos images pour booster le SEO ?
- 15:25 Faut-il vraiment réduire le nombre de versions linguistiques pour hreflang ?
- 18:27 Faut-il vraiment corriger toutes les erreurs 404 remontées dans Search Console ?
- 20:47 Les jump links sont-ils vraiment inutiles pour le crawl de Google ?
- 21:55 Faut-il désavouer les backlinks fantômes visibles uniquement dans Search Console ?
- 23:20 Pourquoi le fichier Disavow ne masque-t-il pas les mauvais liens dans Search Console ?
- 29:18 Faut-il vraiment contextualiser l'attribut alt au-delà de la description visuelle ?
- 32:47 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter des redirections 301 et pages 404 multiples ?
- 33:02 Google déclasse-t-il algorithmiquement certains secteurs en période de crise sanitaire ?
- 34:06 Faut-il vraiment utiliser plusieurs noms de domaine pour un site multilingue ?
- 36:28 Faut-il vraiment rendre toutes les images de recettes indexables pour performer en SEO ?
- 37:49 Faut-il encoder les caractères non-ASCII dans les URLs de sitemap XML ?
- 38:15 Hreflang garantit-il vraiment le bon ciblage géographique de votre trafic international ?
- 41:05 Pourquoi Google indexe-t-il une seule version quand vos pages pays sont quasi-identiques ?
- 45:51 Faut-il créer du contenu différent pour indexer plusieurs variantes d'un même service ?
- 46:27 Faut-il créer une nouvelle page ou modifier l'existante pour un changement temporaire ?
- 49:01 Faut-il vraiment éviter les balises title et meta description multiples sur une même page ?
- 52:13 Les erreurs 500/503 de quelques heures sont-elles vraiment invisibles pour votre indexation ?
John Mueller claims that nofollow links from Reddit have absolutely no SEO impact—neither positive nor negative—because Google does not pass any ranking signal through these attributes. For practitioners, this means stopping the counting of these backlinks in your link profile audits. It remains to be seen if this rule applies uniformly across all contexts, especially when nofollow coexists with other signals.
What you need to understand
What does “no ranking signal” really mean?
When Google talks about “ranking signal”, we enter the technical vocabulary of algorithms. A signal is a piece of data used by the engine to rank pages in the SERPs. Classic PageRank, link anchor text, semantic context around the link—these are all signals.
With a nofollow attribute, Google clearly states that it turns off the faucet. The link exists, crawling may eventually follow the URL (we'll get back to that), but no SEO juice is transmitted. No domain authority, no thematic context, no anchor text. The link becomes invisible from a ranking perspective.
Why Reddit in particular?
Reddit applies the rel="nofollow ugc" attribute to all links posted by users. It's a standard anti-spam measure for years, and Google respects this directive to the letter. Many SEOs, nevertheless, counted these backlinks in their audits, thinking that traffic volume and domain authority must count for something.
But it doesn’t. Mueller clarifies: the fact that Reddit is a massive site changes nothing. Nofollow remains nofollow, and no “SEO credit” flows, regardless of the source's popularity.
Does nofollow really prevent any indirect effects?
This is where it gets tricky. Google states there is no direct effect on ranking, but what about crawling, URL discovery, or indirect effects from generated traffic? A Reddit link can bring thousands of visitors to content, which creates user signals (time spent, bounce rate, engagement).
These behavioral metrics can influence ranking, even if the link itself transmits nothing. Google doesn’t say the link is “useless” in the broad sense—it states that it has no direct technical SEO effect. There’s a nuance.
- Nofollow links do not transmit any ranking signals—neither PageRank, nor anchor, nor thematic context.
- This applies to all sites, including high-authority ones like Reddit or Quora.
- Indirect effects (traffic, discovery, user signals) are not covered by this statement.
- Crawling can still follow these links to discover new URLs, but without any ranking benefits.
- The nofollow attribute is strictly enforced by Google, with no exceptions related to volume or authority of the source site.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
On paper, yes. Since Google introduced the ugc and sponsored attributes in 2019, the official doctrine is clear: these links transmit nothing. But in practice, some sites appear to benefit from a boost after being heavily mentioned on Reddit, even via nofollow links.
The real question is: is it the link itself, or the behavioral signals that follow? An article that goes viral on Reddit generates traffic, shares, and natural mentions elsewhere. These cascading effects can influence ranking, but not the nofollow link itself. Google is not lying—it’s just answering a very precise technical question.
What use cases escape this rule?
Let's be frank: this statement applies to standard nofollow links in UGC contexts. But what about links in editorial content on Reddit (rare, admittedly), or links in subs moderated by Reddit employees themselves? [To be verified]—we have no confirmation that these contexts are treated differently.
Another angle: some SEO tools continue to value these backlinks in their metrics (Domain Rating, Trust Flow, etc.). Why? Because these tools do not replicate Google's algorithm. They analyze links independently of attributes. A Reddit link counts in their calculations, even if Google ignores it.
Should you stop seeking links on Reddit?
No. Stop counting them as direct SEO backlinks, yes. But Reddit remains a source of traffic, visibility, and user signals. If your content generates engagement, Google captures these signals through Chrome, Analytics, Search Console. It’s a traffic acquisition lever, not a link-building lever.
The nuance is this: a Reddit link does not help your SEO through the link itself, but it can help through everything that follows. Don’t confuse the lack of direct technical effect with total uselessness. This is exactly the kind of shortcut Google loves to keep vague.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you change in your backlink audits?
First concrete action: exclude nofollow links from your link-building KPIs. If you use Ahrefs, Majestic, or SEMrush, systematically filter nofollow links when analyzing your backlink profile. They do not contribute to ranking, so counting them skews your metrics.
Second point: stop pitching Reddit backlinks in your link-building strategies. If a client asks, “why don’t we have a Reddit link?”, the answer is simple: because it brings nothing technically. Focus your efforts on dofollow, editorial links in relevant thematic contexts.
How to utilize Reddit without relying on technical SEO?
Reddit remains a traffic acquisition channel, not a link-building tool. If your content is relevant to a community, share it—but with the aim of generating traffic, engagement, and shares. The resulting user signals can indirectly influence your ranking.
Another lever: unlinked brand mentions. If your site or product is mentioned without a link (which often happens on Reddit), Google can still associate these mentions with your entity. This strengthens semantics, E-E-A-T, and notoriety—even without a clickable link.
What mistakes to avoid after this statement?
Don’t fall into the opposite trap: totally ignoring Reddit just because the links don’t count. Reddit can generate thousands of qualified visitors in a few hours, which remains an indirect SEO goal through behavioral signals. Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Another common mistake: believing that this rule applies only to Reddit. All nofollow links, regardless of their origin, transmit nothing. This also concerns Quora, blog comments, forums, and directories with nofollow attributes. Adjust your overall strategy, not just Reddit.
- Filter nofollow links in your Ahrefs/Majestic/SEMrush audits
- Exclude Reddit from your direct link-building KPIs
- Utilize Reddit as a traffic acquisition channel, not for backlinks
- Track unlinked brand mentions to strengthen E-E-A-T
- Do not ignore user signals generated by Reddit traffic
- Adjust your strategy for all nofollow links, not just Reddit
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Un lien nofollow de Reddit peut-il quand même aider au crawl de mon site ?
Les outils SEO valorisent-ils les liens Reddit malgré le nofollow ?
Le trafic généré par Reddit a-t-il un impact SEO indirect ?
Cette règle s'applique-t-elle aussi à Quora, aux forums et aux commentaires de blog ?
Faut-il supprimer Reddit de ma stratégie d'acquisition ?
🎥 From the same video 22
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 54 min · published on 15/05/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.