What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

The full migration to the Mobile-First Index, initially scheduled for September 1st, may be postponed due to the health situation. Google will announce the final date later.
3:50
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h14 💬 EN 📅 04/06/2020 ✂ 44 statements
Watch on YouTube (3:50) →
Other statements from this video 43
  1. 2:22 Pourquoi votre site a-t-il perdu du trafic après une Core Update sans avoir fait d'erreur ?
  2. 2:22 Les Core Web Vitals vont-ils vraiment bouleverser votre stratégie SEO ?
  3. 3:50 Une baisse de classement après une Core Update signifie-t-elle vraiment un problème avec votre site ?
  4. 3:50 Faut-il vraiment attendre avant d'optimiser les Core Web Vitals ?
  5. 7:07 Google peut-il vraiment repousser le Mobile-First Indexing indéfiniment ?
  6. 11:00 Pourquoi Google ne canonicalise-t-il pas les URLs avec fragments dans les sitelinks et rich results ?
  7. 11:00 Les URLs avec fragments (#) dans Search Console : faut-il revoir votre stratégie de tracking et d'analyse ?
  8. 14:34 Pourquoi les chiffres entre Analytics, Search Console et My Business ne correspondent-ils jamais ?
  9. 14:35 Pourquoi vos métriques Google ne concordent-elles jamais entre Search Console, Analytics et Business Profile ?
  10. 16:37 Comment sont vraiment comptabilisés les clics FAQ dans Search Console ?
  11. 18:44 Les accordéons mobile et desktop sont-ils vraiment neutres pour le SEO ?
  12. 18:44 Le contenu masqué par accordéon mobile est-il vraiment indexé comme du contenu visible ?
  13. 29:45 Le rel=canonical via HTTP header fonctionne-t-il vraiment encore ?
  14. 30:09 L'en-tête HTTP rel=canonical fonctionne-t-il vraiment pour gérer les contenus dupliqués ?
  15. 31:00 Pourquoi Search Console affiche-t-il encore 'PC Googlebot' sur des sites récents alors que le Mobile-First Index est censé être la norme ?
  16. 31:02 Mobile-First Indexing par défaut : pourquoi Search Console affiche-t-il encore desktop Googlebot ?
  17. 33:28 Pourquoi Google insiste-t-il sur le contexte textuel dans les feedbacks Search Console ?
  18. 33:31 Les outils Search Console suffisent-ils vraiment à résoudre vos problèmes d'indexation ?
  19. 33:59 Pourquoi vos pages ne s'indexent-elles toujours pas après 60 jours dans Search Console ?
  20. 37:24 Pourquoi Google indexe-t-il parfois HTTP au lieu de HTTPS malgré la migration SSL ?
  21. 37:53 Faut-il vraiment cumuler redirections 301 ET canonical pour une migration HTTPS ?
  22. 39:16 Pourquoi votre sitemap échoue dans Search Console et comment débloquer réellement la situation ?
  23. 41:29 Votre marque disparaît des SERP sans raison : le feedback Google peut-il vraiment résoudre le problème ?
  24. 44:07 Faut-il privilégier un sous-domaine ou un nouveau domaine pour lancer un service ?
  25. 44:34 Sous-domaine ou nouveau domaine : pourquoi Google refuse-t-il de trancher pour le SEO ?
  26. 44:34 Les pénalités Google se propagent-elles vraiment entre domaine et sous-domaines ?
  27. 45:27 Les pénalités Google se propagent-elles vraiment entre domaine et sous-domaines ?
  28. 48:24 Faut-il vraiment ignorer le PageRank dans le choix entre domaine et sous-domaine ?
  29. 48:33 Les liens entre domaine racine et sous-domaines transmettent-ils réellement du PageRank ?
  30. 49:58 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter du contenu dupliqué par scraping ?
  31. 50:14 Peut-on relancer un ancien domaine sans être pénalisé pour le contenu dupliqué par des spammeurs ?
  32. 50:14 Faut-il vraiment signaler chaque URL de scraping via le Spam Report pour obtenir une action de Google ?
  33. 57:15 Faut-il vraiment rapporter le spam URL par URL pour aider Google ?
  34. 58:57 Pourquoi Google refuse-t-il d'afficher vos FAQ en rich results malgré un balisage parfait ?
  35. 59:54 Pourquoi Google n'affiche-t-il pas vos FAQ rich results malgré un balisage parfait ?
  36. 65:15 Peut-on ajouter des FAQ sur ses pages uniquement pour gagner des rich results en SEO ?
  37. 65:45 Peut-on ajouter une FAQ uniquement pour obtenir le rich result sans risquer de pénalité ?
  38. 67:27 Faut-il encore optimiser les balises rel=next/prev pour la pagination ?
  39. 67:58 Faut-il vraiment soumettre toutes les pages paginées dans le sitemap XML ?
  40. 70:10 Faut-il vraiment indexer toutes les pages de catégories pour optimiser son crawl budget ?
  41. 70:18 Faut-il vraiment arrêter de mettre les pages catégories en noindex ?
  42. 72:04 Le nombre de fichiers JavaScript ralentit-il vraiment l'indexation Google ?
  43. 72:24 Googlebot rend-il vraiment tout le JavaScript en une seule passe ?
📅
Official statement from (5 years ago)
TL;DR

Google has chosen to postpone the full transition to the Mobile-First Index, originally set for September 1st, without announcing a new firm deadline. This decision follows the global health context that has slowed technical work for many website publishers. For SEO practitioners, this provides extra time to correct discrepancies between desktop and mobile versions — but it also brings the uncertainty of a floating new timeline.

What you need to understand

What exactly is the Mobile-First Index?

The Mobile-First Index refers to Google’s shift towards prioritizing — and eventually exclusively using — the mobile version of websites for indexing. Prior to this migration, Googlebot mainly crawled desktop versions, even though the majority of traffic was already coming from smartphones.

Specifically, once the migration is finalized, Googlebot will only use the mobile version of a page to determine its ranking in search results, regardless of the user's device. Sites serving different content between desktop and mobile risk losing ranking if the mobile version is less rich or less optimized.

Why was this migration announced and then postponed?

Google had set September 1st as the deadline for completing the transition of all sites still indexed in desktop-first. The goal was clear: to harmonize the index and reflect the actual web usage, which is overwhelmingly mobile.

The postponement is explained by the health context — the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the technical roadmaps of thousands of companies. Google decided not to penalize sites whose teams were unable to finalize mobile optimization on time. No new date has been communicated, placing SEOs in a zone of strategic uncertainty.

What are the technical differences between desktop-first and mobile-first indexing?

In desktop-first indexing, Googlebot crawls the desktop version of a site and extracts ranking signals: textual content, images, internal links, structured data. If the mobile version is lighter — hidden content, images not loaded lazily, simplified internal linking — these elements do not count in the evaluation.

In mobile-first indexing, it’s the opposite. Googlebot first crawls the mobile version. Anything not present, accessible, or indexable on this version disappears from the algorithmic equation. Sites with responsive design and no content divergence fare well. Sites with separate versions (m.example.com) or hidden mobile content must quickly adjust.

  • Content parity between desktop and mobile becomes mandatory: text, images, videos, links.
  • Structured data must be present on the mobile version.
  • Internal linking must be complete on mobile, not an abridged version.
  • Mobile loading performance (Core Web Vitals) takes increased weight.
  • Hreflang annotations, canonicals, and meta tags must be consistent on mobile.

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with observed practices in the field?

Yes, completely. Since March 2020, SEO teams have reported deployment slowdowns related to remote work, budget freezes, and health priorities. Google has never been one to mass penalize sites for reasons beyond webmasters' control.

The postponement of the Mobile-First Index aligns with a pragmatic logic: Google prefers to shift a technical deadline rather than create a massive ranking shock. Historically, Google has always allowed time for structural migrations — HTTPS transition, mobile compatibility (Mobilegeddon), etc. This postponement is consistent with that approach.

What nuances should be added to this announcement?

First, this postponement changes nothing about the direction of travel. The Mobile-First Index remains inevitable. Google will never revert to desktop-first — it’s a technical milestone that cannot be undone. Delaying the deadline does not mean suspending mobile optimization efforts.

Secondly, the absence of a new official deadline places SEOs in uncertainty. Should other projects be prioritized? Is it safe to continue at full throttle? Google has not provided an interim timeline, complicating strategic planning. [To be confirmed]: No public data confirms whether Google measures the compliance rate of sites before setting a new date, or if this is purely an opportunistic postponement.

Caution: even if the overall migration is postponed, Google continues to individually switch sites deemed ready. If your site has already migrated to the Mobile-First Index, this postponement does not directly affect you — you must maintain mobile-desktop parity at all times.

In what cases does this postponement change nothing in your SEO strategy?

If your site is in responsive design with a single HTML code source for all resolutions, this postponement has no operational impact. You are already compliant by design. Your main task then is to monitor Core Web Vitals on mobile.

If you use dynamic serving (content adapted server-side based on user-agent) or separate URLs (m.example.com), this postponement gives you a technical reprieve — but it would be risky to let your guard down. Google may announce a new date with only a few weeks' notice. Mobile-desktop parity audits remain a priority.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do to prepare for this migration?

First step: audit content parity between your desktop and mobile versions. Crawl both versions with Screaming Frog or Oncrawl simulating the respective user-agents. Compare word counts, images, internal links, H1-H6 tags, structured data.

Second step: verify that the mobile internal linking is as rich as on desktop. Hamburger menus that hide hundreds of links can be problematic — Googlebot mobile does not always unfold these menus during crawling. Integrate secondary navigation links in the footer or within the content itself.

What critical mistakes should be avoided?

Avoid falling into the trap of mobile hidden content. If you use accordions, tabs, or lazy-loading images, ensure that Googlebot can access the content without user interaction. Test using the URL Inspection Tool in Search Console in mobile mode.

Also, don’t neglect hreflang and canonical annotations on mobile. If the mobile version points to a desktop URL as canonical, Google might ignore the mobile version — or worse, crawl the wrong version. Ensure that all technical signals point to the mobile version as the source of truth.

How can I check if my site is already migrated or ready for migration?

Check the Search Console, Settings > Crawl section. Google explicitly indicates whether your site is indexed in Mobile-First Index or not. If it is already the case, the message specifies, "Googlebot for smartphones is the primary crawler for this site".

If not, monitor the server logs. If Googlebot Smartphone is crawling your site massively (many times more than Googlebot Desktop), it's a sign that Google is preparing or testing the migration. Compare crawl volumes over rolling 30-day periods to detect a clear trend.

  • Audit content parity desktop/mobile with a professional crawler
  • Verify that all structured data (JSON-LD, microdata) are present on the mobile side
  • Test the accessibility of hidden content (accordions, tabs) using the Search Console inspection tool
  • Compare Googlebot Smartphone vs. Desktop crawl volumes in server logs
  • Ensure that mobile internal linking is complete and explorable without JS interaction
  • Validate that mobile Core Web Vitals are green (LCP, FID, CLS)
The postponement of the Mobile-First Index offers a tactical reprieve, but should not slow your mobile optimization efforts. The underlying trend remains irreversible: Google indexes mobile web. Sites that delay correcting discrepancies between desktop/mobile expose themselves to a sudden loss of visibility once the new deadline is announced — which can be done with very short notice. Given the complexity of these technical audits and the need to coordinate developers, SEOs, and product owners, it may be wise to engage a specialized SEO agency for personalized support and to avoid costly production errors.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Mon site responsive est-il automatiquement compatible avec le Mobile-First Index ?
En théorie oui, si le même HTML est servi à tous les devices. Mais vérifiez que vous ne masquez pas de contenu côté mobile via CSS ou JavaScript — Googlebot peut ne pas le prendre en compte.
Google va-t-il pénaliser les sites non migrés après la nouvelle échéance ?
Google ne parle pas de pénalité directe, mais les sites encore indexés en desktop-first verront leur version mobile devenir la référence — avec le risque de perdre du ranking si elle est moins riche.
Faut-il modifier les fichiers robots.txt ou sitemap XML pour la migration ?
Non. Les fichiers robots.txt et sitemap XML restent identiques. Google crawle simplement la version mobile de chaque URL au lieu de la version desktop.
Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils plus importants en Mobile-First Index ?
Oui, puisque Google mesure désormais les performances mobile en priorité. Un site lent sur mobile verra son ranking affecté, même si la version desktop est rapide.
Comment savoir si mon site a déjà basculé en Mobile-First Index ?
Consultez la Search Console, section Paramètres > Exploration. Google indique explicitement quel Googlebot (Desktop ou Smartphone) est le robot principal de votre site.
🏷 Related Topics
Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Mobile SEO Redirects

🎥 From the same video 43

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h14 · published on 04/06/2020

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.