Official statement
Other statements from this video 13 ▾
- 1:36 Peut-on vraiment faire confiance aux déclarations officielles de Google sur le SEO ?
- 3:41 Google peut-il recommander des pratiques SEO avant même que l'algorithme change ?
- 5:38 Où trouver les vraies recommandations officielles de Google quand les articles de blog sont obsolètes ?
- 7:49 Le contenu dupliqué pénalise-t-il vraiment le référencement Google ?
- 8:23 Le budget de crawl est-il vraiment un mythe inventé par les SEO ?
- 13:13 Les erreurs de crawl sont-elles vraiment un problème pour votre SEO ?
- 14:35 Le JavaScript est-il vraiment indexé comme le HTML par Google ?
- 29:24 Le HTML valide est-il vraiment inutile pour le SEO ?
- 30:50 Les liens sortants influencent-ils vraiment le classement dans Google ?
- 31:13 Google pénalise-t-il vraiment les sites d'affiliation ou est-ce un mythe SEO ?
- 31:38 La vitesse de chargement booste-t-elle vraiment le SEO ou est-ce un mythe ?
- 39:59 Les interstitiels mobiles nuisent-ils vraiment à votre visibilité Google ?
- 42:02 Les domaines nationaux ont-ils vraiment un avantage géographique dans Google ?
Google claims that the nofollow attribute on internal links no longer allows for PageRank sculpting. This once-popular practice is now counterproductive as it disrupts the understanding of a site's standard architecture. The result: removing internal nofollow links and allowing natural crawling is the best approach to optimize PageRank flow.
What you need to understand
Why does Google advise against using nofollow internally?
The use of nofollow on internal links has long been a PageRank sculpting technique. The idea? Prevent link juice from diluting to secondary pages like legal notices or contact pages. But Google has changed the rules.
For several years, nofollow has become an indicator rather than a strict directive. Google can choose to follow these links or not. The result: you no longer control PageRank flow as you did before. Worse, you complicate your site's reading for algorithms that expect a standard web architecture.
In practical terms, adding internal nofollow confuses signals. Google uses internal links to understand the hierarchy of a site, identify important pages, and distribute PageRank. Interfering with this natural process can harm the indexing and ranking of certain strategic pages.
Did this practice ever make sense?
Yes, at a time when nofollow was an absolute directive. SEOs could force Google to ignore certain internal links, thereby concentrating PageRank on high ROI pages. This was pure PageRank sculpting.
But Google has changed the rules of the game. Now, even with a nofollow, PageRank can still be divided among all links on a page, whether they are followed or not. The difference? The juice that should have gone to a nofollow link is simply lost; it doesn't redistribute to other links.
What types of internal links are affected?
All links on a site can theoretically receive a nofollow attribute, but some were prime targets for this practice. Links to legal pages (terms and conditions, legal notices, privacy policies), contact forms, or login pages were often tagged as nofollow.
Other SEOs used this technique on repetitive navigation links (footer, sidebar) to avoid excessive dilution. But this is precisely the kind of manipulation that Google discourages, as it disrupts the understanding of the natural site architecture.
- Internal nofollow no longer controls PageRank flow as it used to
- Google now treats nofollow as an indicator, not a directive
- This practice can disrupt indexing and understanding of architecture
- Links to legal, contact, and login pages were the most affected
- The "saved" PageRank on a nofollow link is lost, not redistributed
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
Yes and no. On paper, Google clearly states that internal nofollow serves no purpose. In practice, some SEOs still observe effects, but it's hard to say whether they are linked to nofollow or other factors like overall linking improvements.
The reality is that Google has made nofollow much less predictable. Since 2019, the attribute has shifted from directive to indicator. The result: it's impossible to guarantee that a nofollow link won't be followed. Traditional PageRank sculpting is dead. [To be verified] in your own audits: gradually remove internal nofollow links and measure the impact on crawling and positions.
What are the real practical consequences?
Removing internal nofollow can free up wasted crawl budget. If Google must analyze each nofollow attribute to decide whether to respect it or not, you add an unnecessary layer of complexity. Let the bot naturally crawl legal pages: it understands their role without your interference.
However, keep in mind that some pages may receive more PageRank than before if you massively remove nofollow links. This can redistribute link juice unexpectedly. Monitor pages that gain or lose visibility after this cleanup.
One point that Mueller does not elaborate on is what to do with external nofollow links in content. The statement only concerns internal links, but the principle remains valid: avoid abusing nofollow unless justified (UGC, sponsored links).
In what rare cases does internal nofollow remain relevant?
To be honest: there are still specific situations where internal nofollow can be warranted. For example, on user-generated content platforms (forums, marketplaces), marking certain internal links as nofollow can limit the risks of internal spam.
Similarly, on sites with thousands of parameter pages (filters, sorts, session URLs), nofollow can help guide crawling, although using robots.txt or canonical tags remains more effective. But these are exceptions, not the general rule.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do concretely on an existing site?
The first step: audit all internal links marked as nofollow. A scraper like Screaming Frog allows you to quickly identify these occurrences. Focus on global navigation links (header, footer, sidebar) and contextual links within the content.
Once the audit is complete, gradually remove internal nofollow links that have no technical justification. Start with the links to legal and contact pages, then extend to other areas. Track crawling evolution in Search Console to verify that Google is properly recrawling these pages.
What mistakes to avoid during this migration?
Do not remove all nofollow links at once on a large site. A massive change can temporarily disrupt crawling and the distribution of PageRank. Proceed in waves, starting with the least sensitive areas.
Another trap: confusing nofollow with crawl budget control. If certain pages really should not be crawled (duplicates, test pages), use robots.txt or meta noindex, not nofollow. Nofollow does not block anything; it simply suggests not to follow.
Finally, do not overlook the impact on overall internal linking. Removing nofollow can reveal imbalances in your linking structure. Take the opportunity to strengthen links to your strategic pages.
How to verify that the change produces the expected effects?
Monitor the number of crawled pages and the budget allocated in Search Console. If Google is crawling more legal pages than before without neglecting your high-value pages, it’s a good sign. Also, analyze the variations in positions and organic traffic on your key pages.
Use a log tracking tool to observe if Googlebot is now following different paths in your site. A better distribution of crawling indicates that your architecture is better understood.
- Audit all internal links with nofollow attribute (Screaming Frog, Sitebulb)
- Gradually remove unjustified nofollow, in waves
- Prioritize header, footer, and links to legal and contact pages
- Check crawling evolution in Search Console (crawled pages, budget)
- Monitor variations in positions and organic traffic on strategic pages
- Analyze server logs to observe new crawling paths
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le nofollow interne a-t-il encore un impact sur le PageRank ?
Faut-il supprimer tous les nofollow internes d'un site ?
Le nofollow empêche-t-il Google de crawler une page ?
Quels liens internes étaient le plus souvent marqués nofollow ?
Comment mesurer l'impact de la suppression des nofollow internes ?
🎥 From the same video 13
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 06/12/2016
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.