What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

For health and medical pages, indicating the qualifications and credibility of the author can help maintain or improve rankings in search results, particularly after algorithm updates targeting the quality of information.
20:40
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 54:46 💬 EN 📅 20/12/2017 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube (20:40) →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. 6:12 Faut-il encore suivre les principes fondamentaux du SEO ou tout miser sur le mobile et les données structurées ?
  2. 7:26 Les paramètres URL contradictoires sabotent-ils vraiment votre crawl Google ?
  3. 8:42 Comment préparer efficacement son site au Mobile-First Indexing de Google ?
  4. 11:03 Pourquoi Yahoo bloque-t-il l'AMP Client ID API et comment cela impacte-t-il vos analytics ?
  5. 13:11 Pourquoi les annotations rel="amphtml" doivent-elles être présentes sur les deux versions de vos pages ?
  6. 18:37 Les pages santé doivent-elles vraiment afficher les qualifications de leurs auteurs pour ranker ?
  7. 21:31 Faut-il vraiment ouvrir ses environnements de dev à Googlebot pour tester le mobile-friendly ?
  8. 25:33 Faut-il vraiment viser le 100/100 sur PageSpeed Insights ?
  9. 30:57 Comment signaler efficacement un site non conforme aux règles Google ?
  10. 38:27 Google retarde-t-il vraiment le Mobile-First Index pour protéger les sites non prêts ?
  11. 46:41 Google va-t-il enfin lancer une application mobile pour la Search Console ?
📅
Official statement from (8 years ago)
TL;DR

Google states that <strong>mentioning the qualifications and credibility</strong> of the author on health pages can <strong>maintain or improve rankings</strong>, especially after quality updates. This suggests that the search engine evaluates editorial authority as a <strong>trust signal</strong>. The problem is, Google remains vague on how these qualifications are technically detected and weighted in the algorithm.

What you need to understand

Why does Google emphasize qualifications for medical content?

Pages dealing with health, medicine, and wellness fall under what Google calls YMYL topics (Your Money or Your Life). This content can directly impact users' health decisions, so the information risk is high.

Google aims to prioritize credible and verifiable sources to reduce the spread of questionable or dangerous medical content. Displaying the author's qualifications serves as a trust proxy for the algorithm.

How does the algorithm actually detect these qualifications?

Google does not explicitly detail the technical mechanisms. It is presumed that the algorithm combines multiple signals: detection of structured markup (Schema.org Author with degree mentions), semantic analysis of the author page content, and correlation with external databases (verifiable professional profiles, indexed academic publications).

The engine likely assesses the consistency between displayed qualifications and the topic being discussed. An article on cardiology authored by a certified cardiologist will carry more weight than general content without clear attribution.

Does this statement apply to all types of health content?

No. Google distinguishes between general informational content (symptoms, prevention) and content with diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The latter requires formal medical expertise, while the former can more easily include health journalists or qualified popularizers.

The granularity of requirements also varies depending on the seriousness of the topic: cancer, chronic illnesses, and major treatments demand explicit medical authority. Nutritional advice or general wellness can accept a diversity of author profiles as long as credibility is established.

  • Indicating the author’s qualifications is not just an editorial recommendation; it’s an algorithmic signal for health YMYL
  • Google favors consistency between displayed expertise and the medical topic being addressed
  • Quality updates specifically target health sites without proof of editorial authority
  • Detection of qualifications likely involves advanced NLP and external databases
  • Diagnostic/therapeutic content demands formal medical expertise, unlike general informational content

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with field observations?

Yes, partially. Post-Medic update audits (and subsequent updates) show that sites adding detailed author pages with degrees, hospital affiliations, and publications often regained traffic. However, correlation does not imply causation: these sites generally improved multiple E-E-A-T signals simultaneously.

The problem is that Google does not specify the relative weight of this signal. A site with qualified authors but poor content does not outperform a competitor with better content but less visible authors. [To be verified]: How does the algorithm weigh visible qualifications against behavioral signals (reading time, bounce rates)?

What nuances should be added to this recommendation?

Google talks about "maintaining or improving" rankings, a cautious phrase indicating that this is not a guaranteed ranking lever. It’s more of a defensive signal: its absence can penalize you in health YMYL, while its presence brings you up to standard but is not sufficient on its own.

Another nuance is that qualifications must be verifiable. Displaying "Dr. Martin, nutrition expert" without a link to a professional profile, publications, or medical license number risks being ignored by the algorithm or even viewed as a manipulative attempt. Algorithmic credibility relies on external evidence.

In what cases does this rule apply less?

Community health sites (forums, patient testimonials) cannot display medical qualifications for every contributor. Google seems to tolerate these formats as long as they are clearly identified as non-prescriptive personal experiences.

Health information aggregators that cite official medical sources (WHO, Ministry of Health, published studies) can compensate for the lack of a unique author by demonstrating editorial rigor and verifiable references. The authority signal then comes from the cited sources rather than the direct author.

Attention: Displaying false medical qualifications is not only ineffective for SEO but may lead to manual penalties and legal issues. Verifiability is key.

Practical impact and recommendations

What practical steps should be taken to optimize author qualifications?

The first step is to create detailed author pages for each writer involved in health topics. These pages should mention degrees, specializations, professional affiliations, and publications if applicable. Add a link to the LinkedIn profile or a professional directory for external validation.

Use Schema.org Author markup with properties such as jobTitle, affiliation, and alumniOf when relevant. Link each article to its author page via rel="author" and ensure the consistency of structured data to facilitate algorithmic extraction.

How can qualifications be displayed without burdening user experience?

Integrate a short bio at the end of the article (2-3 lines) with a photo, professional title, and link to the full author page. This approach meets SEO needs without cluttering the reading experience. For longer content, a discreet sidebar box can remind readers of the author’s expertise.

On mobile, prefer a collapsed accordion or an “About the Author” link that opens the bio without interrupting navigation. The key is that the information should be present in the DOM and crawlable, not necessarily displayed intrusively.

What mistakes should be avoided in displaying qualifications?

Avoid vague mentions like "recognized expert" or "specialist" without evidence. Google looks for verifiable and precise qualifications: named degrees, identified institutions, quantified years of experience.

Also, do not create fake author profiles or attribute content to doctors who did not actually participate in writing. This practice can be detected by cross-referencing with professional databases and may lead to severe downgrades.

  • Create dedicated author pages with degrees, specializations, and professional affiliations
  • Implement Schema.org Author with jobTitle, affiliation, and alumniOf
  • Link each health article to its author page using rel="author"
  • Add links to external professional profiles (LinkedIn, medical directories)
  • Display a short bio at the end of the article with a link to the complete author page
  • Verify the consistency between displayed qualifications and the topics covered
Optimizing author qualifications for health content requires a structured and verifiable approach. It's not just about adding text, but about building a credibility ecosystem linking content, authors, and external evidence. These technical and editorial optimizations can be complex to orchestrate alone, especially for sites with a high volume of medical content. Engaging a SEO agency specialized in YMYL can help you implement a cohesive strategy that meets algorithmic and regulatory requirements.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Les qualifications d'auteur sont-elles obligatoires pour tous les contenus santé ?
Non, mais fortement recommandées pour les sujets YMYL médicaux. Les contenus informatifs généraux tolèrent des auteurs journalistes qualifiés, mais les sujets diagnostiques/thérapeutiques exigent une expertise médicale formelle.
Comment Google vérifie-t-il les qualifications affichées ?
Probablement via analyse sémantique des pages auteur, détection de balisage structuré et corrélation avec des bases externes (profils professionnels, publications académiques). La vérifiabilité externe est clé.
Afficher des qualifications suffit-il à améliorer le ranking ?
Non. C'est un signal défensif parmi d'autres. Son absence peut pénaliser en YMYL santé, mais sa présence ne garantit pas de gains si les autres signaux E-E-A-T et la qualité du contenu sont faibles.
Puis-je afficher les qualifications d'un médecin consultant sans qu'il rédige directement ?
Risqué. Si le médecin valide réellement le contenu et assume la responsabilité éditoriale, c'est acceptable. Créer de faux profils ou attribuer du contenu sans participation réelle peut entraîner des pénalités.
Quel format de balisage utiliser pour les qualifications d'auteur ?
Schema.org type Person avec les propriétés Author, jobTitle, affiliation, alumniOf et sameAs pointant vers profils professionnels externes. Lier chaque article via rel="author" vers la page auteur complète.
🏷 Related Topics
Algorithms Domain Age & History Content AI & SEO

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 54 min · published on 20/12/2017

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.