Official statement
Other statements from this video 12 ▾
- 4:00 Les polices non-Unicode nuisent-elles vraiment à l'indexation de votre contenu ?
- 5:15 Les évaluateurs de qualité Google influencent-ils vraiment vos positions ?
- 9:39 Panda fonctionne-t-il vraiment en continu ou Google nous cache-t-il quelque chose ?
- 9:52 Pourquoi Google veut-il que votre contenu soit bookmarké plutôt que trouvé via la recherche ?
- 11:00 Le contenu dupliqué ruine-t-il vraiment votre classement Google ?
- 12:06 Le noindex protège-t-il vraiment votre site des pénalités qualité ?
- 13:23 Faut-il dupliquer les balises hreflang sur mobile et desktop ?
- 15:15 Faut-il vraiment débloquer les images dans le robots.txt pour améliorer son SEO ?
- 19:00 Un noindex temporaire fait-il vraiment perdre son positionnement pour de bon ?
- 48:11 Faut-il vraiment abandonner la commande site: pour compter vos pages indexées ?
- 50:14 Les pages lentes sont-elles vraiment indexées par Google ?
- 57:59 Faut-il vraiment faire confiance aux données structurées de la Search Console ?
Google claims that shares and likes on social media have no direct impact on rankings. Social signals are often nofollow or invisible to the crawler. Nevertheless, social networks remain useful for visibility and can generate natural backlinks that do count.
What you need to understand
Why does Google ignore social signals?
The technical reason is simple: Google cannot effectively crawl the majority of content on social media. Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter/X impose access restrictions through their APIs and their pages often require a login to display content. Google's crawler faces walls.
Another obstacle: links shared on social media are nofollow. This tag explicitly tells Google not to pass link juice. Even if Google could see these shares, they would not factor into the PageRank calculation. Social platforms have always enforced this policy to prevent massive spam.
Have social signals ever counted in the algorithm?
Never officially. Matt Cutts already debunked this myth back in 2014, and John Mueller regularly repeats the same thing. Some believe they have observed a correlation between social shares and positions in the SERPs, but correlation does not equal causation: content that ranks well is also the content that gets shared naturally.
The confusion likely comes from the fact that social signals reflect the quality and popularity of content, just like backlinks do. But one is not the cause of the other in Google's algorithm. They are two parallel consequences of good content.
Are social networks useless for SEO then?
Absolutely not. Even without direct impact, social networks play a significant indirect role. Massively shared content gains visibility, increases the chances of being picked up by authoritative sites, and generates qualified traffic. This traffic sends positive behavioral signals to Google.
Social networks can also speed up indexing. Google discovers new content via links, and if your article circulates on Twitter or LinkedIn, it will likely be crawled faster. Not because Google reads Twitter, but because bloggers or journalists will see and link to it.
- Social media links are nofollow and do not pass PageRank directly
- Google cannot crawl the majority of content on closed social platforms
- Social signals are not an official ranking factor in Google's algorithm
- A strong social presence indirectly increases visibility and can generate natural backlinks
- Social networks sometimes accelerate indexing by facilitating discovery by link creators
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes, it is. No serious study has ever proven a causal correlation between social signals and positions in Google. Studies claiming the opposite systematically confuse correlation and causation. A site that performs well in SEO produces quality content, which is naturally shared on social media. The reverse is not true.
However, it should be nuanced: social media profiles themselves can rank. A LinkedIn page or a Twitter account often appears in the SERPs for brand queries. In this specific case, Google indexes and ranks these pages just like any other public URL. But interactions on these pages (likes, comments) do not affect their ranking.
What nuances should be added?
The first nuance: Google can technically access certain public content on Twitter/X and sometimes LinkedIn. These pages are crawlable and indexable. However, this does not mean that engagement metrics (retweets, likes) are used as a ranking signal. Google sees the page, not the interactions.
The second nuance: social media generates referral traffic. This traffic sends behavioral signals (bounce rate, time spent, pages viewed) that Google observes through Chrome and Analytics. If your article goes viral on LinkedIn and visitors spend 5 minutes on it, Google will take note. Indirect, but real.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
There aren’t really any exceptions. Social signals never become a direct ranking factor, regardless of the niche or country. Some have speculated that Google News might take them into account for freshness, but there's no proof of this.
The only case where social media counts directly is in Google Discover searches and certain features like Top Stories. In this context, Google can combine several signals, potentially including social virality, to decide what to display. But Discover is not classic organic ranking. [To be verified] — Google has never officially confirmed the exact weighting of signals in Discover.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do with social media practically?
Continue using social media, but with realistic objectives. Don’t measure their ROI in Google positions, but in visibility, traffic, brand awareness, and backlink opportunities. Social networks are a lever for acquisition and branding, not for direct technical SEO.
Focus your social efforts on the platforms where your audience is active. If you are in B2B, LinkedIn takes precedence. In B2C lifestyle, Instagram or TikTok. There’s no need to be everywhere: it’s better to have a strong presence on two platforms than to spread oneself thinly over ten.
What mistakes should be avoided?
The first mistake: buying likes or shares to boost your SEO. It’s completely unnecessary since Google doesn’t see them, and moreover, it’s against the TOS of most platforms. You risk being banned for nothing.
The second mistake: neglecting social networks on the grounds that they don’t count for SEO. They count for everything else: acquisition, retention, authority building. A journalist who follows you on Twitter and references your study in an article is a quality backlink. Indirect, but highly effective.
How can you optimize the indirect effect of social media?
Facilitate sharing of your content with visible social buttons (but not intrusive) and well-configured Open Graph / Twitter Cards meta tags. An attractive visual preview increases the click-through rate of shares, thus increasing referral traffic.
Create content that is specifically designed to be shared: case studies, infographics, exclusive data, well-argued positions. Viral content on social media naturally attracts mentions and links. This is where the indirect SEO effect plays out.
- Use social networks to amplify visibility, not to manipulate rankings
- Correctly configure Open Graph and Twitter Cards meta tags for attractive previews
- Focus your efforts on 1 to 3 platforms relevant to your audience
- Measure referral traffic and generated backlinks, not vanity metrics (likes, shares)
- Never buy fake social signals, it’s pointless and risky
- Create natively shareable content: studies, data, infographics, well-managed controversies
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Les partages sociaux aident-ils à indexer plus vite un contenu ?
Un profil LinkedIn ou Twitter peut-il ranker dans Google ?
Faut-il mettre les liens de réseaux sociaux en nofollow sur mon site ?
Google Analytics ou Search Console trackent-ils le trafic des réseaux sociaux ?
Les signaux sociaux comptent-ils dans Google Discover ou Google News ?
🎥 From the same video 12
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h01 · published on 02/08/2017
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.