Official statement
Other statements from this video 19 ▾
- 1:38 Pourquoi les outils SEO et Google Analytics ne montrent-ils pas les mêmes impacts après une Core Update ?
- 1:38 Pourquoi les classements post-Core Update évoluent-ils à des vitesses différentes selon vos outils ?
- 2:39 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter de ses backlinks et utiliser le fichier disavow ?
- 2:39 Faut-il vraiment surveiller tous ses backlinks ou Google exagère-t-il le risque ?
- 4:10 Le contenu généré par les utilisateurs pèse-t-il vraiment autant que votre contenu éditorial aux yeux de Google ?
- 4:11 Le contenu généré par les utilisateurs est-il vraiment traité comme le contenu éditorial par Google ?
- 6:51 Faut-il vraiment utiliser noindex pour gérer la visibilité du contenu interne ?
- 6:51 Faut-il utiliser le noindex pour tester un contenu avant de l'indexer ?
- 6:57 Google a-t-il vraiment un algorithme YMYL spécifique pour la santé et la finance ?
- 9:05 Faut-il vraiment isoler les contenus sensibles dans des sous-domaines séparés ?
- 10:31 Faut-il cloisonner les sections éditoriales d'un site pour booster sa visibilité dans Google ?
- 14:49 Le contenu white label nuit-il vraiment à votre indexation Google ?
- 22:02 Faut-il vraiment s'inscrire à Google News pour apparaître dans Discover ?
- 34:25 Comment optimiser pour Google Discover sans cibler de mots-clés ?
- 39:12 Google Discover privilégie-t-il vraiment la qualité sur le taux de clics ?
- 49:44 Faut-il vraiment utiliser le code 410 plutôt que le 404 pour accélérer la désindexation ?
- 53:59 404 ou 410 : Google fait-il vraiment la différence sur le long terme ?
- 54:00 Les balises canoniques locales peuvent-elles vraiment booster votre visibilité sans cannibalisation ?
- 57:38 Comment utiliser les balises canoniques pour éviter la cannibalisation entre vos contenus multi-localisations ?
Google has adapted the display of French press content following new regulations on neighboring rights. By default, no excerpts are shown for sites on the press list unless the publisher explicitly allows Google to display them. For SEOs managing French media sites, this means taking proactive steps to maintain visibility in Google News and general search.
What you need to understand
What French law requires Google to change how excerpts are displayed?
The European directive on neighboring rights requires platforms like Google to compensate press publishers for using their content. In France, this has led to an opt-in approach: French press publishers must give explicit consent for their excerpts to appear in search results.
Specifically, Google maintains an official list of press sites subject to this regime. If your site is on this list, the default display is now minimalist — title only, without description or thumbnail — until an agreement is signed or permission is granted through Google Publisher Center.
How does Google identify the sites affected by this restriction?
Google relies on legal criteria defined by French law: publication frequency, the presence of a professional editorial team, advertising revenue, legal status. Eligible sites are notified and appear on a list maintained by Google and accessible to publishers via Publisher Center tools.
This classification is not automatic or transparent to all. Some media sites discover their inclusion through a sharp drop in their CTR in Google News. Other small publishers escape the filter and continue to display excerpts without restriction, creating a disparity in treatment.
What differences are observed between Google News and traditional search?
In Google News, the absence of excerpts is particularly noticeable: only titles are displayed, making articles less attractive and reducing the click-through rate. In traditional organic search, the behavior is similar — no meta description or rich snippet until permission is given.
Sites that have signed an agreement with Google — like Le Monde, Le Figaro, Libération — typically display their excerpts. Those that refuse or have not yet negotiated remain in degraded mode, mechanically losing referential traffic, especially on mobile where the title alone is not enough to capture attention.
- Google applies a minimal default display for officially listed French press sites
- Permission to display excerpts must be actively given via Google Publisher Center or a commercial agreement
- This measure affects both Google News and traditional search, with a direct impact on CTR
- Non-listed sites or those that have signed an agreement continue to display their snippets and thumbnails normally
- A site's status can change — new inclusions or withdrawals — based on the legal criteria applied by Google
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
Yes, and this can be immediately verified by searching for French news articles in Google News. Sites that have refused or not yet negotiated an agreement only display their title and source, without excerpts or images. This restriction has been applied uniformly and consistently since the law was enacted.
However, the line between listed and unlisted sites remains blurry. Some blogs with significant editorial audiences escape the filter, while other small local media are included. Google does not publicly release this comprehensive list, creating a frustrating information asymmetry for SEOs who need to guess their clients' status.
What nuances should be added to this display rule?
Mueller speaks of "sites listed on a press list" — but this list is not static. Google regularly updates inclusions and exclusions based on the evolution of sites and their legal status. A pure player that professionalizes may enter; an associative blog may exit.
Another nuance: permission granted via Publisher Center is granular. A publisher can allow excerpts to be displayed in Google News but not in Discover, or vice versa. This technical flexibility is not mentioned by Mueller, but it exists and deserves attention for deftly negotiating visibility. [To be verified]: the actual impact of these partial permissions on traffic volume remains poorly documented.
In what cases can this restriction be circumvented or not apply?
If your site is not recognized as a press media in the legal sense, you escape the restriction — excerpts, images, and featured snippets display normally. This applies to many blogs, institutional or corporate sites that publish news without being press publishers.
Aggregators and curators of content, if they themselves are not classified as media, can also freely display excerpts from third-party sites. Lastly, Google grants technical exemptions for certain formats: AMP stories, embedded YouTube videos, indexed podcasts. These formats receive distinct, sometimes more favorable treatment.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should SEOs managing French media sites do concretely?
First step: check if your site is on the press list subject to neighboring rights. Log in to Google Publisher Center and review notifications. If you are on it, you should have received (or should have received) an email from Google explaining the situation and available options.
Next, activate the display permission via Publisher Center if you want to maximize your visibility. This process is free and reversible. It does not prevent you from simultaneously negotiating a commercial compensation agreement with Google, but it avoids an immediate drop in traffic during negotiations.
What mistakes should be avoided in managing this situation?
Do not remain passive, hoping Google will "correct" the display on its own. Without action on your part, your excerpts will remain invisible indefinitely. Some publishers have lost 30 to 50% of their News traffic simply due to administrative inertia.
Another common mistake: confusing display permissions with waiving neighboring rights. Allowing excerpts does not deprive you of any rights. You can still demand remuneration later, but you avoid the immediate traffic hemorrhage.
How to measure the impact of this restriction on your traffic?
Analyze in Google Search Console the CTR curve of URLs categorized as "News" between the period before and after the law was implemented. Filter by device (mobile is more affected) and compare with your direct competitors who have signed an agreement.
Also observe the traffic volume from Google News specifically (source/medium = google/news or gnews). A drop correlated with the disappearance of excerpts confirms the direct impact. Finally, monitor your positioning in the "Top Stories" carousel — some unauthorized publishers are completely excluded from it.
- Log in to Google Publisher Center and verify your status as a French press site
- Activate the permission to display excerpts for Google News and traditional search
- Configure granular permissions (News, Discover, Search) according to your editorial strategy
- Monthly track the News CTR and Google referential traffic in Search Console
- Compare your performance with direct competitors who have active agreements
- Document the financial impact (loss of ad revenue) to support potential negotiations
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Mon site média est-il forcément concerné par cette restriction d'extraits ?
Autoriser l'affichage des extraits m'empêche-t-il de négocier une rémunération avec Google ?
Cette restriction s'applique-t-elle uniquement à Google News ou aussi à la recherche classique ?
Puis-je autoriser les extraits sur Google News mais pas sur Discover ?
Quelle perte de trafic peut représenter l'absence d'extraits dans Google News ?
🎥 From the same video 19
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 59 min · published on 16/10/2019
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.