What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

In France, due to new laws, for sites listed on a press list, no text excerpts are shown by default unless actively chosen.
32:08
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 59:06 💬 EN 📅 16/10/2019 ✂ 20 statements
Watch on YouTube (32:08) →
Other statements from this video 19
  1. 1:38 Why don’t SEO tools and Google Analytics show the same impacts after a Core Update?
  2. 1:38 Why do post-Core Update rankings change at different speeds across your tools?
  3. 2:39 Should you really worry about your backlinks and use a disavow file?
  4. 2:39 Should you really monitor all your backlinks, or is Google overstating the risk?
  5. 4:10 Does user-generated content really hold as much weight as your editorial content in Google's eyes?
  6. 4:11 Does Google really treat user-generated content like editorial content?
  7. 6:51 Should you really use noindex to control the visibility of internal content?
  8. 6:51 Should you use noindex to test content before indexing it?
  9. 6:57 Does Google really have a specific YMYL algorithm for health and finance?
  10. 9:05 Should you really isolate sensitive content in separate subdomains?
  11. 10:31 Should you compartmentalize the editorial sections of a site to boost its visibility in Google?
  12. 14:49 Does white label content really harm your Google indexing?
  13. 22:02 Do you really need to register with Google News to appear on Discover?
  14. 34:25 How can you optimize for Google Discover without targeting keywords?
  15. 39:12 Does Google Discover really prioritize quality over click-through rates?
  16. 49:44 Should you really use the 410 code instead of the 404 to speed up deindexing?
  17. 53:59 Does Google really differentiate between 404 and 410 statuses in the long run?
  18. 54:00 Can local canonical tags truly enhance your visibility without causing cannibalization?
  19. 57:38 How can you effectively use canonical tags to prevent competition among your multi-location content?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google has adapted the display of French press content following new regulations on neighboring rights. By default, no excerpts are shown for sites on the press list unless the publisher explicitly allows Google to display them. For SEOs managing French media sites, this means taking proactive steps to maintain visibility in Google News and general search.

What you need to understand

What French law requires Google to change how excerpts are displayed?

The European directive on neighboring rights requires platforms like Google to compensate press publishers for using their content. In France, this has led to an opt-in approach: French press publishers must give explicit consent for their excerpts to appear in search results.

Specifically, Google maintains an official list of press sites subject to this regime. If your site is on this list, the default display is now minimalist — title only, without description or thumbnail — until an agreement is signed or permission is granted through Google Publisher Center.

How does Google identify the sites affected by this restriction?

Google relies on legal criteria defined by French law: publication frequency, the presence of a professional editorial team, advertising revenue, legal status. Eligible sites are notified and appear on a list maintained by Google and accessible to publishers via Publisher Center tools.

This classification is not automatic or transparent to all. Some media sites discover their inclusion through a sharp drop in their CTR in Google News. Other small publishers escape the filter and continue to display excerpts without restriction, creating a disparity in treatment.

What differences are observed between Google News and traditional search?

In Google News, the absence of excerpts is particularly noticeable: only titles are displayed, making articles less attractive and reducing the click-through rate. In traditional organic search, the behavior is similar — no meta description or rich snippet until permission is given.

Sites that have signed an agreement with Google — like Le Monde, Le Figaro, Libération — typically display their excerpts. Those that refuse or have not yet negotiated remain in degraded mode, mechanically losing referential traffic, especially on mobile where the title alone is not enough to capture attention.

  • Google applies a minimal default display for officially listed French press sites
  • Permission to display excerpts must be actively given via Google Publisher Center or a commercial agreement
  • This measure affects both Google News and traditional search, with a direct impact on CTR
  • Non-listed sites or those that have signed an agreement continue to display their snippets and thumbnails normally
  • A site's status can change — new inclusions or withdrawals — based on the legal criteria applied by Google

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with field observations?

Yes, and this can be immediately verified by searching for French news articles in Google News. Sites that have refused or not yet negotiated an agreement only display their title and source, without excerpts or images. This restriction has been applied uniformly and consistently since the law was enacted.

However, the line between listed and unlisted sites remains blurry. Some blogs with significant editorial audiences escape the filter, while other small local media are included. Google does not publicly release this comprehensive list, creating a frustrating information asymmetry for SEOs who need to guess their clients' status.

What nuances should be added to this display rule?

Mueller speaks of "sites listed on a press list" — but this list is not static. Google regularly updates inclusions and exclusions based on the evolution of sites and their legal status. A pure player that professionalizes may enter; an associative blog may exit.

Another nuance: permission granted via Publisher Center is granular. A publisher can allow excerpts to be displayed in Google News but not in Discover, or vice versa. This technical flexibility is not mentioned by Mueller, but it exists and deserves attention for deftly negotiating visibility. [To be verified]: the actual impact of these partial permissions on traffic volume remains poorly documented.

In what cases can this restriction be circumvented or not apply?

If your site is not recognized as a press media in the legal sense, you escape the restriction — excerpts, images, and featured snippets display normally. This applies to many blogs, institutional or corporate sites that publish news without being press publishers.

Aggregators and curators of content, if they themselves are not classified as media, can also freely display excerpts from third-party sites. Lastly, Google grants technical exemptions for certain formats: AMP stories, embedded YouTube videos, indexed podcasts. These formats receive distinct, sometimes more favorable treatment.

Warning: systematically refusing to display excerpts to negotiate compensation can backfire. The loss of organic traffic may far exceed the hypothetical revenue from neighboring rights, especially for medium-sized media without negotiation power against Google.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should SEOs managing French media sites do concretely?

First step: check if your site is on the press list subject to neighboring rights. Log in to Google Publisher Center and review notifications. If you are on it, you should have received (or should have received) an email from Google explaining the situation and available options.

Next, activate the display permission via Publisher Center if you want to maximize your visibility. This process is free and reversible. It does not prevent you from simultaneously negotiating a commercial compensation agreement with Google, but it avoids an immediate drop in traffic during negotiations.

What mistakes should be avoided in managing this situation?

Do not remain passive, hoping Google will "correct" the display on its own. Without action on your part, your excerpts will remain invisible indefinitely. Some publishers have lost 30 to 50% of their News traffic simply due to administrative inertia.

Another common mistake: confusing display permissions with waiving neighboring rights. Allowing excerpts does not deprive you of any rights. You can still demand remuneration later, but you avoid the immediate traffic hemorrhage.

How to measure the impact of this restriction on your traffic?

Analyze in Google Search Console the CTR curve of URLs categorized as "News" between the period before and after the law was implemented. Filter by device (mobile is more affected) and compare with your direct competitors who have signed an agreement.

Also observe the traffic volume from Google News specifically (source/medium = google/news or gnews). A drop correlated with the disappearance of excerpts confirms the direct impact. Finally, monitor your positioning in the "Top Stories" carousel — some unauthorized publishers are completely excluded from it.

  • Log in to Google Publisher Center and verify your status as a French press site
  • Activate the permission to display excerpts for Google News and traditional search
  • Configure granular permissions (News, Discover, Search) according to your editorial strategy
  • Monthly track the News CTR and Google referential traffic in Search Console
  • Compare your performance with direct competitors who have active agreements
  • Document the financial impact (loss of ad revenue) to support potential negotiations
Managing neighboring rights and display in Google News requires a combined technical and legal approach. Between Publisher Center settings, analytics tracking, commercial negotiation, and regulatory monitoring, the complexity can quickly surpass the internal resources of an editorial team. Engaging a SEO agency specialized in media can secure both immediate visibility and medium-term monetization strategy, without sacrificing one for the other.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Mon site média est-il forcément concerné par cette restriction d'extraits ?
Seulement s'il figure sur la liste officielle de Google des sites de presse français éligibles au droit voisin. Cette liste se base sur des critères légaux : fréquence de publication, rédaction professionnelle, statut juridique. Vérifiez votre inclusion via Google Publisher Center.
Autoriser l'affichage des extraits m'empêche-t-il de négocier une rémunération avec Google ?
Non, absolument pas. L'autorisation technique via Publisher Center est indépendante de toute négociation commerciale sur le droit voisin. Elle évite simplement la perte de trafic en attendant un éventuel accord financier.
Cette restriction s'applique-t-elle uniquement à Google News ou aussi à la recherche classique ?
Elle touche les deux. Dans Google News, seuls les titres s'affichent. Dans la recherche organique classique, les meta descriptions et snippets enrichis sont également supprimés jusqu'à autorisation explicite de l'éditeur.
Puis-je autoriser les extraits sur Google News mais pas sur Discover ?
Oui, Google Publisher Center permet une gestion granulaire des autorisations par surface d'affichage : News, Search, Discover. Vous pouvez ajuster finement votre stratégie de visibilité selon vos priorités éditoriales et commerciales.
Quelle perte de trafic peut représenter l'absence d'extraits dans Google News ?
Les études de cas montrent des baisses de CTR de 30 à 50% sur mobile pour les sites affichant uniquement leur titre sans description ni image. L'impact varie selon la notoriété de la marque et la qualité éditoriale du titre lui-même.
🏷 Related Topics
Content Discover & News Featured Snippets & SERP AI & SEO

🎥 From the same video 19

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 59 min · published on 16/10/2019

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.