Official statement
Other statements from this video 21 ▾
- 1:37 Les en-têtes X-Robots-Tag bloquent-ils vraiment le suivi des redirections par Google ?
- 1:37 L'en-tête X-Robots-Tag peut-il bloquer Googlebot sur une redirection 301 ?
- 2:16 Le blocage par les FAI mobiles peut-il vraiment tuer votre référencement ?
- 5:21 Pourquoi votre positionnement chute-t-il après la levée d'une action manuelle Google ?
- 5:26 Une pénalité manuelle levée efface-t-elle vraiment toute trace négative sur vos classements ?
- 7:32 Pourquoi les migrations techniques compliquent-elles autant le référencement de votre site ?
- 8:36 Faut-il vraiment éviter de cumuler migration de domaine et refonte technique ?
- 11:37 Faut-il vraiment optimiser Lighthouse si les utilisateurs trouvent votre site rapide ?
- 11:47 Le Time to Interactive est-il vraiment un facteur de classement Google ?
- 13:32 Googlebot précharge-t-il les liens internes comme un navigateur moderne ?
- 13:48 Googlebot charge-t-il vraiment votre site comme un utilisateur anonyme à chaque visite ?
- 14:55 Combien de temps dure vraiment une migration de site aux yeux de Google ?
- 14:55 Combien de temps faut-il vraiment pour récupérer après un transfert de domaine ?
- 17:39 Les paramètres UTM peuvent-ils saborder votre indexation Google ?
- 18:07 Les paramètres UTM peuvent-ils polluer votre indexation Google ?
- 24:50 Google peut-il ignorer votre rel=canonical et indexer une autre version de votre page ?
- 26:32 Faut-il vraiment créer un site par pays pour son SEO international ?
- 33:34 Les liens affiliés nuisent-ils vraiment au classement Google ?
- 39:54 L'UX améliore-t-elle vraiment le classement SEO ou Google contourne-t-il la question ?
- 44:14 Faut-il désavouer des liens pour améliorer son classement Google ?
- 53:03 L'API de Search Console rame-t-elle vraiment, ou est-ce un problème côté utilisateur ?
Google claims that blocking Googlebot at the Internet Service Provider (ISP) level can lead to a gradual disappearance of pages from search results, even if the robots.txt is not restrictive. This statement raises questions about crawling mechanisms and the responsibility of hosts. In practice, a technically compliant server-side site can face deindexing if upstream network blocks prevent the bot from accessing resources.
What you need to understand
What is an ISP block and how does it affect Googlebot?
An ISP (Internet Service Provider) block takes place at the level of network infrastructures before the request even reaches your server. Unlike robots.txt directives or 403/404 errors that occur on-site, an ISP block cuts off communication upstream.
For Googlebot, this situation resembles a completely inaccessible site. The crawler receives no HTTP response: neither explicit errors nor content. The result? Google interprets this absence as a signal of a dead or unavailable site and triggers a gradual deindexing.
Why does Mueller specify 'for example in the United States'?
The geographical mention is not trivial. Some hosts or content delivery networks (CDNs) apply blocking rules by region, often for legal compliance, security, or licensing reasons. Therefore, a site may be perfectly accessible from Europe but blocked for requests coming from Google US datacenters.
This setup creates a geographical fragmentation of crawling. If Googlebot primarily uses American IPs to crawl your site and those IPs are blacklisted, your content becomes invisible to a massive portion of the crawling infrastructure — even if your server technically works.
In what concrete cases would an ISP block Googlebot?
Classic scenarios include misconfigured firewalls that identify bot traffic as malicious, overly aggressive anti-DDoS systems that limit request bursts, or geopolitical restrictions imposed by certain hosts. Some CDNs also implement rate limiting rules that, if they do not distinguish Googlebot from abusive scraping, may block the legitimate crawler.
Less common but possible: conflicts between BGP routing and IP geolocation. If your host uses complex routing and some IP ranges of Google are poorly referenced, traffic may be rejected before it even reaches your infrastructure. This is invisible from your server but fatal for crawling.
- The ISP blocking occurs upstream of the server and generates no exploitable server log
- A site may be accessible from certain regions but blocked for Google datacenters
- The main causes are misconfigured anti-DDoS systems, firewalls, and CDNs
- Google interprets the lack of response as permanent unavailability and deindexes
- Checking crawl from multiple geographical locations is essential
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
Mueller’s position aligns with documented cases of brutal deindexing where no technical issue on the server side was identifiable. Sites with a correct crawl budget, clean server logs, and a permissive robots.txt have indeed disappeared from the SERPs after hosting changes or CDN policy updates. The key point: Google does not notify these blocks in Search Console.
Where it gets tricky: Mueller remains vague on timing. How long between the block and deindexing? A week? A month? It likely depends on your domain authority and usual crawl frequency. A site crawled daily will be impacted more quickly than a marginal site. [To verify]
What nuances should be added to this statement?
Not all ISP blocks are the same. An intermittent block — for instance, rate limiting that allows 20% of requests through — will not have the same impact as complete blacklisting. Google may consider a partially accessible site as slow but indexable, especially if the strategic pages remain crawlable.
Another point: the notion of “disappearance” from results. Is it a total deindexing or a loss of rankings? A site blocked for Googlebot US but accessible from Europe may remain indexed with “stale” content and positions that gradually collapse. Mueller does not detail this common intermediate scenario.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
If your site uses server-side rendering (SSR) with prerendering for bots, some ISP blocks can be bypassed via rendering proxies. Google can then access a pre-calculated version hosted on secondary infrastructure. But this is a complex strategy, rarely implemented outside of large sites.
Another exception: sites with an ultra-fresh XML sitemap and actively submitted. If Google detects updates via the sitemap while direct crawling fails, it may try crawling from other datacenters or delay deindexing. But this is a reprieve, not a solution. [To verify]
Practical impact and recommendations
How to detect an ISP block affecting Googlebot?
First step: compare server logs to crawl reports from Search Console. If Search Console indicates crawl failures while your logs show no access attempts, that’s a signal. The block occurs before Googlebot reaches your server — hence no trace on Apache/Nginx.
Use external monitoring tools that simulate crawls from different geographical locations (UptimeRobot, Pingdom, StatusCake). If your site responds from Paris but times out from Ashburn (Virginia), you have a lead. Cross-reference with the public IPs of Google datacenters for accuracy. Let's be honest: it’s tedious and often inconclusive without access to your host’s network logs.
What corrective actions should be taken immediately?
Contact your host or CDN provider to review the firewall and anti-DDoS rules. Demand an explicit whitelist of Googlebot IP ranges — official list published by Google and verifiable via reverse DNS. Some hosts apply restrictive policies by default without informing you.
If you are using Cloudflare, Akamai, or another CDN, temporarily disable the Bot Fight Mode or Advanced Challenge functions. These tools sometimes block Googlebot despite their native whitelists. Test in “monitoring” mode for a few days and watch the crawl progress. At the same time, submit your priority URLs via the URL Inspection tool in Search Console to force crawl attempts.
How to prevent this type of problem in the long run?
Establish a proactive crawl monitoring: set up alerts if the daily volume of Googlebot drops by more than 30% over a week. Use the Search Console APIs to automate this monitoring. Document the network architecture of your hosting — which CDNs, which firewalls, which geographical routing rules.
When changing hosts or CDNs, plan a minimum 2-week transition period in which both infrastructures coexist. Monitor crawl metrics daily. If a collapse is detected, you can quickly revert to the old configuration. This dual infrastructure is costly but avoids catastrophic deindexing. These optimizations — multi-geographical monitoring, IP whitelisting, advanced CDN configuration — require sharp expertise in infrastructure. If you lack these skills in-house, consulting an SEO agency specialized in technical audits can save you precious time and prevent costly mistakes.
- Systematically compare server logs and Search Console reports to detect discrepancies
- Set up availability monitoring from multiple geographical areas (US, EU, Asia)
- Check and document firewall, anti-DDoS, and CDN rules with your host
- Explicitly whitelist the official Googlebot IP ranges across all network layers
- Set up automated alerts for crawl volume variations (threshold: -30% over 7 days)
- Test any infrastructure change in a parallel environment before final switch
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Un blocage ISP apparaît-il dans les rapports Search Console ?
Combien de temps avant qu'un blocage ISP entraîne une désindexation ?
Les CDN peuvent-ils bloquer Googlebot par erreur ?
Comment vérifier si mon hébergeur bloque certaines IP Google ?
Un site bloqué uniquement aux États-Unis peut-il rester indexé pour l'Europe ?
🎥 From the same video 21
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 54 min · published on 19/02/2019
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.