What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Switching from HTTP to HTTPS can help maintain rankings, but it is advisable to avoid changing the URL structure simultaneously to minimize fluctuations.
41:10
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h11 💬 EN 📅 02/12/2016 ✂ 16 statements
Watch on YouTube (41:10) →
Other statements from this video 15
  1. 1:37 Faut-il réellement attendre que Google réindexe automatiquement vos pages après un 404 ?
  2. 4:26 Les pages orphelines restent-elles indexées malgré l'absence de liens internes ?
  3. 6:58 Les pages orphelines impactent-elles vraiment votre budget de crawl ?
  4. 10:44 Hreflang vs canonical : peut-on vraiment les utiliser ensemble sans casser l'indexation multilingue ?
  5. 12:26 Faut-il vraiment mentionner tous les mots-clés exacts dans vos contenus pour ranker ?
  6. 17:43 Un bon positionnement Google signifie-t-il vraiment un contenu de qualité ?
  7. 20:52 Les mots-clés dans l'URL améliorent-ils vraiment le référencement ?
  8. 28:26 Pourquoi vos URL de sitemap doivent-elles correspondre exactement à votre maillage interne ?
  9. 31:29 Comment Google décide-t-il vraiment de la fréquence de crawl de vos pages ?
  10. 33:14 Faut-il vraiment se fier à la commande site: pour auditer l'indexation ?
  11. 37:20 Pourquoi un changement d'URL fait-il chuter vos positions pendant plusieurs semaines ?
  12. 45:41 Comment Google détecte-t-il vraiment les vidéos pour les classer dans la recherche universelle ?
  13. 47:25 Faut-il vraiment désindexer vos événements passés ou risquez-vous de perdre du trafic organique ?
  14. 49:13 Comment bloquer efficacement les URL dynamiques malveillantes ou inutiles générées par votre site ?
  15. 94:36 Pourquoi Google abandonne-t-il Keyword Planner pour l'analyse de pertinence ?
📅
Official statement from (9 years ago)
TL;DR

Mueller confirms that switching from HTTP to HTTPS better preserves rankings if nothing else is changed. Simultaneously modifying URL structure increases variables and complicates diagnostics in case of a drop. Specifically: first migrate to HTTPS, stabilize for 4 to 6 weeks, then tackle URL restructuring if necessary.

What you need to understand

Why does Google emphasize separating these processes?

Every technical change sends crawling signals to Google. A switch to HTTPS already triggers a massive reevaluation: new canonical URLs, 301 redirects, gradual reindexing. If you also change the URL structure (shifting from /page.php?id=123 to /category/page-title/), you layer two sets of redirects and complicate the propagation of internal PageRank.

Google then has to manage a double cascade: HTTP to HTTPS, followed by old hierarchy to new hierarchy. Each layer slows down crawling and dilutes signals. You will never know if a drop in traffic is due to misconfigured HTTPS, poorly understood new URLs, or a saturated crawl budget.

What actually happens if everything gets mixed up?

You create a scenario of double migration: Google must first understand that http://example.com/product.php?id=42 redirects to https://example.com/product.php?id=42, and then that this URL redirects to https://example.com/store/product-name/. The result: chains of redirects, slowed crawl, diluted signals.

Fluctuations become impossible to diagnose. Does a 20% drop in category traffic come from an issue with HTTPS canonicalization, an error in the new rewrite rules, or broken internal linking from the hierarchy change? You are left in the fog.

Is HTTPS alone truly sufficient to stabilize rankings?

Mueller speaks of "facilitating the maintenance of rankings," not improving them. HTTPS has been a light ranking signal for years, but its direct impact remains minimal. What matters is the continuity of signals: if your HTTP→HTTPS redirects are clean (permanent 301s, no chains), Google transfers PageRank without significant loss.

But be aware: even a clean switch to HTTPS causes micro-fluctuations for 2 to 4 weeks. Google crawls, reindexes, recalculates. If you add a URL redesign on top, you double this window of instability. [To be verified] Depending on the site size, some report stabilization periods up to 8 weeks for large e-commerce catalogs.

  • Separate the processes: HTTPS first, URL redesign later (minimum 4-6 weeks apart)
  • Avoid redirect chains: a single step HTTP→HTTPS, never HTTP→HTTPS→new URL
  • Monitor the crawl: Search Console must show full HTTPS indexing before any other migration
  • Document everything: if you mix, you'll never know which variable caused the drop
  • HTTPS alone does not boost rankings: it's a prerequisite, not a growth lever

SEO Expert opinion

Is this guideline really followed in practice?

Let's be honest: the majority of the redesigns I audit violate this rule. Clients want to do everything at once — switching to HTTPS, new hierarchy, new CMS, new design — to "minimize interruptions." The result: three months of sterile diagnostics when rankings drop by 30%. Impossible to pinpoint the culprit.

The few clean migrations I've followed confirm Mueller's guideline: HTTPS first, stabilization, then URL redesign. Sites that adhered to this sequence experienced less than a 5% drop in traffic during the HTTPS window, recovered within 3 weeks. Those that mixed everything lost 15-25% for 2 to 4 months. Field data supports this statement.

What are the flaws in this recommendation?

Mueller simplifies. On a large e-commerce site (100k+ URLs), separating HTTPS and URL redesign means doubling development, testing, and deployment costs. Certain technical contexts—legacy platform migration, contractual constraints with hosts—make this sequencing unrealistic.

Then there’s the case of sites with massive duplicate content: if your HTTP is riddled with wild parameters (?sort=, ?filter=, ?page=), moving to HTTPS without cleaning up the structure means duplicating the pollution. It may be healthier to handle everything at once, even if it means enduring 6 months of turbulence. [To be verified]: I have never seen Google document this specific scenario.

Does Google underestimate the organizational challenges?

Yes. Convincing a client to spread a migration over 12 weeks instead of 3 is a political battle. Management wants a "big bang" to limit mobilized resources. Explaining that we'll need to crawl the site twice, deploy dev, QA, and SEO teams twice, rarely goes over well.

The real difficulty is not technical; it’s organizational. Mueller provides the proper steps to follow, but he doesn’t explain how to sell this timeline to an executive team seeking visible results by the end of the quarter. The result: on-the-ground SEOs make compromises, and migrations become risky bets instead of well-managed projects.

Warning: If you absolutely must mix HTTPS and URL redesign (business constraints), prepare a complete rollback plan. Map out each redirect, test in a staging environment using Screaming Frog crawls, and keep the old HTTP URLs active in read-only mode for at least 4 weeks. You will need this lifeline.

Practical impact and recommendations

How can you effectively organize an HTTPS migration without touching the URLs?

First step: install the SSL certificate and configure 301 HTTP→HTTPS redirects on all URLs, including old 404 pages. Test with a complete local crawl (Screaming Frog, Oncrawl) to ensure there are no redirect chains or loops. Each HTTP URL must redirect in a single step to its HTTPS equivalent.

Next, update all hard-coded internal links in your templates, menus, footers. Don't rely solely on redirects: each internal link should point directly to HTTPS to avoid wasting crawl budget. Also check canonicals, hreflang, XML sitemaps, robots.txt. Everything should point to HTTPS before going live.

What mistakes cause the most damage during an HTTPS transition?

The classic error: leaving resources (CSS, JS, images) in HTTP on HTTPS pages. This generates mixed content warnings in Chrome and can block display. Google crawls these pages as broken, and you lose positions unnecessarily. Scan your entire site with a tool that detects mixed content before launching the migration.

Another trap: failing to declare the HTTPS property in Search Console as the main property. Google treats HTTP and HTTPS as two distinct sites. If you don't force the switch through the Console, Google will continue to crawl predominantly in HTTP for weeks. The result: mixed indexing, cannibalization, unstable rankings.

Should you wait a specific timeframe before launching a URL redesign after HTTPS?

Yes. Wait until 95% of your HTTPS pages are indexed in Search Console. This generally takes 4 to 6 weeks for a medium-sized site (10k-50k URLs). For a large catalog, expect 8 to 12 weeks. Monitor the indexing coverage report: when the HTTP URLs have nearly disappeared and HTTPS dominates, you are ready.

Don't rely solely on the calendar deadline. A poorly crawled site (insufficient crawl budget, deep hierarchy) may stagnate for months. If after 8 weeks you still have 30% HTTP URLs indexed, do not launch a URL redesign over this. Address the crawl problem first: optimize internal linking, remove unnecessary URLs, increase the frequency of sitemap updates.

  • Install the SSL certificate and configure 301 HTTP→HTTPS redirects (one step, no chains)
  • Update all hard-coded internal links, canonicals, hreflang, XML sitemaps to HTTPS
  • Scan the site to detect and fix any mixed content (HTTP resources on HTTPS pages)
  • Declare the HTTPS property in Search Console and set it as primary
  • Monitor HTTPS indexing for at least 4-6 weeks before any other migrations
  • Only launch a URL redesign after complete stabilization (95% of HTTPS URLs indexed)
Switching to HTTPS is a delicate technical operation that requires careful planning and constant monitoring. If you manage a large site or if your current hierarchy already has weaknesses (duplicates, redirect chains, crawl issues), it may be wise to engage a specialized SEO agency to secure this migration and avoid costly traffic losses. Expert support will help you identify risks in advance, sequence tasks correctly, and respond quickly in case of unexpected fluctuations.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Peut-on perdre des positions en passant simplement de HTTP à HTTPS sans rien changer d'autre ?
Oui, des micro-fluctuations de 5-10 % sont fréquentes pendant 2 à 4 semaines le temps que Google recrawle et réindexe. Mais si les redirections sont propres et que vous ne touchez à rien d'autre, les positions se stabilisent rapidement.
Combien de temps faut-il attendre entre le passage HTTPS et une refonte d'URL ?
Minimum 4 à 6 semaines sur un site moyen (10k-50k URL), jusqu'à 8-12 semaines sur un gros catalogue. Attendez que 95 % des URL HTTPS soient indexées dans Search Console avant de lancer tout autre chantier.
Les redirections HTTP vers HTTPS doivent-elles être en 301 ou 302 ?
Toujours 301 (permanentes). Une 302 signale un changement temporaire et Google ne transfère pas le PageRank complètement. Cela retarde la stabilisation des positions et dilue vos signaux.
Faut-il garder les anciennes URL HTTP actives après la migration HTTPS ?
Non, elles doivent rediriger en 301 vers HTTPS immédiatement. Mais gardez les redirections actives indéfiniment, surtout si vous avez des backlinks pointant en HTTP. Ne supprimez jamais ces règles de redirection.
Le passage HTTPS améliore-t-il vraiment les positions dans Google ?
L'impact direct est marginal. Le HTTPS est un signal de ranking léger, mais ce n'est pas un levier de croissance. Ce qui compte, c'est de ne pas casser les signaux existants pendant la migration. Voyez-le comme un prérequis, pas comme un boost.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History HTTPS & Security AI & SEO Domain Name Pagination & Structure

🎥 From the same video 15

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h11 · published on 02/12/2016

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.