What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

When Google encounters links with the nofollow attribute, it takes note of them but does not send any signals, such as PageRank, to the target page of the link.
0:35
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1:06 💬 EN 📅 15/08/2019 ✂ 2 statements
Watch on YouTube (0:35) →
Other statements from this video 1
  1. 0:35 Pourquoi Google affiche-t-il les liens nofollow dans Search Console s'ils ne transmettent aucun signal ?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google claims that nofollow links do not transmit any PageRank signals to the target pages. In practical terms, this means adding nofollow to your internal links does not redistribute SEO juice elsewhere — it simply destroys it. This clarification puts an end to the idea of PageRank sculpting and requires a complete rethink of internal linking strategy.

What you need to understand

What does 'does not send any signals' really mean?

When Google encounters a nofollow link, it records it in its index but treats it like a dead end: no PageRank flows through this link. The algorithm sees it, notes it, but derives no conclusions for the ranking of the target page.

This nuance is critical. A nofollow link is not invisible — it exists in the web graph — but it becomes sterile in terms of authority transfer. Google can use it to discover new URLs, but the benefit stops there.

Why does this rule change the game for PageRank sculpting?

For years, some SEOs practiced PageRank sculpting: strategically placing nofollow on internal links deemed less important to concentrate the juice on key pages. The idea? To force Google to distribute PageRank only where desired.

Except that Mueller’s statement kills this practice. When you add a nofollow to an internal link, you are not redirecting PageRank elsewhere — you are evaporating it. The crawl budget remains the same, but you are wasting ranking potential. It’s akin to burning SEO cash.

How does Google treat other link attributes then?

Since the introduction of sponsored and ugc, Google clarified that these attributes are 'hints' rather than strict directives. Unlike historic nofollow, the algorithm can choose to ignore them in certain contexts.

But Mueller’s statement remains firm on classic nofollow: no signal transmitted, period. The distinction with sponsored/ugc is important — Google retains the right to interpret these based on context, which allows for flexibility that pure nofollow does not.

  • A nofollow link transfers no PageRank — neither to the target page nor elsewhere.
  • The 'lost' PageRank on a nofollow link does not redistribute to other links on the page.
  • Google still discovers URLs via nofollow, but without ranking benefits.
  • The sponsored and ugc attributes are treated as hints, not absolute orders.
  • Internal linking should favor follow links to maximize the distribution of SEO juice.

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?

Yes, and it’s actually one of the few assertions from Google that perfectly aligns with what we see in practice. A/B tests on internal linking consistently show that replacing follow links with nofollow breaks the flow of PageRank without improving the remaining pages. No mutual benefit.

Where it gets interesting is that this rule applies uniformly — e-commerce sites, media, SaaS. No matter your industry, nofollow remains a black hole for PageRank. The few counter-examples observed generally can be explained by other factors (optimized anchors, reduced crawl depth) rather than an exception to the rule.

What nuances should be added to this official position?

Mueller speaks of PageRank, but it’s crucial to understand that Google uses hundreds of ranking signals. A nofollow link can still bring direct traffic, generate awareness, or create a favorable semantic context even without juice transfer.

Moreover, the phrasing 'does not send any signals' deliberately remains vague on other dimensions. Does Google completely ignore the anchor text of a nofollow? Co-citation analysis? [To be verified] — public data is lacking to definitively settle this, even though everything suggests that the impact remains marginal.

In what cases does this rule pose practical problems?

The major problem concerns CMS and themes that automatically add nofollow to certain navigation elements or footer links. Many sites are bleeding PageRank without knowing it, with dozens of internal links marked nofollow by default in widgets or menus.

Another critical case: sites with faceted filters (e-commerce). Some SEOs apply nofollow on sorting/filtering URLs to avoid duplicate content. Result? They cut off access to PageRank for perfectly legitimate product pages located deeper in the hierarchy. A well-placed canonical would have solved the issue without sacrificing juice.

Warning: If you are heavily using nofollow internally to 'control crawl', you are likely sabotaging your own PageRank distribution. Audit your templates before optimizing anything else.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do concretely about your internal linking?

First priority: scan all your internal links to identify unjustified nofollow links. Screaming Frog or Sitebulb do this very well. Filter by 'rel=nofollow' and check each occurrence — you will probably discover dozens of links that your CMS has marked by default without valid reason.

Next, strictly reserve nofollow for cases where you really don’t want to associate your site with the destination: disclosed affiliate links, unmoderated user-generated content, login/cart pages. For everything else — navigation, taxonomies, products, articles — let PageRank flow through follow links.

What critical mistakes should you avoid immediately?

First mistake: believing you can 'optimize' PageRank by concentrating it through strategic nofollow links. That’s over. If you’ve applied sculpting in the past, reverse this strategy and switch back to follow unless there are legitimate exceptions (duplicate, spam).

Second frequent mistake: using nofollow on pagination or faceted navigation links to 'protect crawl budget'. Wrong approach. Instead, use canonicals, URL parameters in Search Console, or deferred JavaScript to manage crawl without killing PageRank.

How can I check that my site is optimizing internal PageRank correctly?

Analyze the click depth of your strategic pages. If important landing pages are 4-5 clicks from the home page when they should be prioritized, that's a symptom. Next, check if any nofollow links are blocking the shortest paths — often, this is the case.

Use an internal linking visualization tool (OnCrawl, Botify, or even a Screaming Frog export analyzed in Gephi) to spot bottlenecks. Orphan or nearly orphan pages (only 1-2 incoming links) are warning signals — check if any nofollow links are isolating them from the rest of the site.

  • Audit all internal links to remove unjustified nofollow links from navigation and editorial content
  • Strictly reserve nofollow for affiliate links, unmoderated UGC, and areas outside of SEO scope (login, cart)
  • Replace sculpting strategies with canonicals or URL parameter management
  • Ensure that strategic pages are accessible within 3 clicks via follow links
  • Check CMS templates and themes to eliminate automatic nofollows on footers, sidebars, or menus
  • Measure internal PageRank distribution with an advanced crawl tool to identify blockages
Nofollow kills PageRank without redistributing it — sculpting is out. Focus on a clean internal linking structure, with follow links to your strategic pages and minimal click depth. Fine-tuning internal linking can quickly become technical and time-consuming, especially on sites with thousands of pages. If you lack resources or expertise to audit and restructure your linking architecture, engaging a specialized SEO agency can save you months and secure your traffic gains.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Si je retire tous les nofollow de mes liens internes, est-ce que je risque une pénalité Google ?
Non, aucun risque. Google recommande même de laisser circuler le PageRank librement en interne. La seule exception concerne les liens vers du contenu généré par les utilisateurs non modéré ou des pages sans valeur éditoriale.
Les liens nofollow aident-ils quand même à la découverte de nouvelles pages par Googlebot ?
Oui, Google peut suivre un lien nofollow pour découvrir une URL et l'indexer. Mais cette page ne bénéficiera d'aucun signal de classement via ce lien — il faudra d'autres chemins en follow pour lui transférer du PageRank.
Est-ce que sponsored et ugc se comportent exactement comme nofollow ?
Non. Google traite ces attributs comme des « hints » qu'il peut choisir d'interpréter ou d'ignorer selon le contexte. Le nofollow classique reste une directive stricte : aucun signal transmis, point final.
Peut-on combiner nofollow avec d'autres attributs comme sponsored sur le même lien ?
Oui, c'est même recommandé par Google pour les liens affiliés : rel="nofollow sponsored". L'algorithme prendra en compte tous les attributs déclarés pour mieux comprendre la nature du lien.
Si un concurrent pointe massivement des liens nofollow vers mon site, ça m'impacte négativement ?
Non. Les liens nofollow entrants n'apportent pas de PageRank, mais ils ne pénalisent pas non plus. Google les ignore simplement dans le calcul de votre autorité. Inutile de les désavouer.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History AI & SEO Links & Backlinks

🎥 From the same video 1

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1 min · published on 15/08/2019

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.