Official statement
Other statements from this video 26 ▾
- 8:27 L'expérience utilisateur suffit-elle vraiment à contourner Panda ?
- 10:11 Faut-il vraiment changer le contenu d'une page à chaque visite pour mieux ranker ?
- 11:00 Les redirections 301 transfèrent-elles vraiment tous les signaux SEO vers la nouvelle URL ?
- 11:04 Les redirections 301 transfèrent-elles vraiment tous les signaux SEO vers la nouvelle URL ?
- 11:38 Les liens internes positionnés en bas de page perdent-ils leur valeur SEO ?
- 13:41 Pourquoi le Knowledge Graph disparaît-il après une restructuration de site ?
- 16:19 JavaScript, mobile et données structurées : pourquoi Google pousse-t-il ces trois chantiers simultanément ?
- 16:21 Pourquoi le rendu JavaScript peut-il torpiller votre visibilité dans Google ?
- 19:05 Votre site mobile est-il vraiment équivalent à votre version desktop ?
- 19:33 Faut-il vraiment rediriger les produits en rupture définitive vers des alternatives ?
- 23:31 Pourquoi les balises canonical sont-elles critiques pour vos sites multilingues ?
- 23:53 Comment gérer la canonicalisation des sites multilingues sans perdre votre trafic international ?
- 25:40 Comment Google gère-t-il vraiment le contenu dupliqué sur votre site ?
- 28:36 Comment signaler efficacement du contenu dupliqué à Google ?
- 29:29 Le contenu dupliqué interne est-il vraiment un problème pour votre référencement ?
- 32:43 Faut-il vraiment conserver les URLs de produits définitivement retirés du catalogue ?
- 33:30 Le défilement infini tue-t-il vraiment votre référencement ?
- 34:52 Faut-il supprimer les pages produits en rupture de stock ou les conserver indexées ?
- 46:05 Comment éviter que Google confonde deux sites au contenu similaire ?
- 46:30 Google réécrit-il vraiment vos méta-descriptions comme bon lui semble ?
- 47:04 La Search Console cache-t-elle une partie de vos données de trafic ?
- 49:34 Les liens dans les PDF transmettent-ils du PageRank et améliorent-ils le classement ?
- 54:47 Google utilise-t-il vraiment des scores de lisibilité pour classer vos contenus ?
- 55:23 La vitesse de page mobile suffit-elle vraiment à faire décoller votre classement ?
- 55:29 La vitesse mobile est-elle vraiment un facteur de classement prioritaire sur Google ?
- 179:16 Les données structurées influencent-elles vraiment le classement Google ?
Google states that the presence of internal links outweighs their position on the page. The main issue remains crawlability: without a coherent internal linking structure, the search engine struggles to explore your strategic content. In practical terms, prioritize the volume and relevance of links over their exact pixel location.
What you need to understand
What does Google really say about the position of internal links?
Mueller presents a simple principle: the existence of an internal link matters more than its exact placement in the DOM. Whether your link is in the header, sidebar, or footer, Google follows it. The algorithm does not assign radically different weight based on whether the link appears at the top or bottom of the page.
This statement primarily aims to disarm the obsession of some SEOs with finding the “perfect position.” The real issue isn't precise placement, but the complete absence of links to strategic pages. A site without a clear internal navigation structure remains a maze for Googlebot.
Why does exploration take precedence over position?
Crawling is the gateway to SEO. If Googlebot doesn't discover a page, it doesn't exist in the index. Internal links form the main traffic network that the bot uses to discover and prioritize your content.
Mueller emphasizes a point that is rarely understood: crawlability isn’t just about having a clean robots.txt file. It concerns the logical structure of the internal linking. An orphan page—without incoming links from the rest of the site—can technically be accessible via a direct URL, but Googlebot often misses it or assigns it a negligible crawl budget.
How does Screaming Frog help diagnose this issue?
The tool crawls your site like Googlebot would, following internal links. It quickly identifies orphan pages, excessive click depths, and broken silos. It acts as a thermometer for your internal linking.
This way, you discover which important pages are buried eight clicks away from the homepage or which strategic categories receive no links from your editorial content. Screaming Frog maps the gap between your ideal architecture and crawlable reality.
- Presence > Position: Google follows internal links regardless of their DOM placement.
- Navigation = Exploration: Without a structure of links, your pages remain invisible to crawls.
- Orphan Pages = Blind Spot: No incoming links means near-absence of effective indexing.
- Crawling Tools: Screaming Frog, Oncrawl, or Botify reveal architectural flaws.
- Click Depth: Important pages should remain within 3-4 clicks of the homepage.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes and no. Mueller willingly simplifies the situation. In principle, all internal links pass PageRank and assist with crawling. However, claiming that position plays no role is a misleading shortcut.
A/B tests show that a link placed in the editorial body—contextualized, surrounded by relevant text—performs better than a generic link in the footer. Why? Because Google analyzes the semantic context of the link, its anchor text, and the thematic relevance of the area where it appears. A footer link like “legal mentions” doesn't carry the same weight as an editorial link anchored on a strategic keyword. [To verify] with your own data: compare the SEO traffic of pages linked only in the footer versus pages linked in the body content.
What nuances should be applied to this rule?
Mueller says “less important,” not “not important.” The distinction matters. A link in the main content area benefits from rich semantic context, unlike a template link repeated over 10,000 pages. Google can differentiate a unique editorial link from an automatic navigational link.
Another critical point: user attention. An invisible link or one buried in an overloaded sidebar is rarely clicked. The internal click-through rate (CTR) sends behavioral signals to Google. A linked page that is never visited gradually loses crawl priority. Therefore, placement indirectly impacts SEO through engagement metrics.
When does this rule not fully apply?
On large e-commerce or media websites with thousands of template pages, Google applies weighting to navigation links vs. editorial links. A sidebar link repeated across 50,000 pages almost doesn't pass PageRank to the target page—massive dilution.
Conversely, on a blog with 200 pages, every link matters more. The scale context modifies the rule. Never generalize a Google statement without testing it on your own site type. A valid piece of advice for a small showcase site may be counterproductive for a marketplace with 500,000 SKUs.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should be done concretely to optimize internal linking?
First, map your current architecture. Run a Screaming Frog or Oncrawl crawl. Identify orphan pages, excessive click depths, and broken silos. Export the list of pages with zero incoming internal links: these are your SEO blind spots.
Next, build a strategic linking plan. List your priority pages (those that generate revenue or strategic traffic) and ensure they receive contextual links from your editorial content. A blog post should systematically link to 2-3 relevant category or product pages. This is sculpted PageRank, not scattered.
What mistakes should be absolutely avoided?
Avoid multiplying identical footer/sidebar links across all pages. Google detects them as templates and devalues them. A unique link in a blog article is worth ten times a footer link repeated across 10,000 pages.
Also, avoid generic anchors that lack meaning: “click here,” “learn more,” “next page.” Google uses anchor text to understand the theme of the target page. A descriptive anchor (“optimize internal linking for Google crawling”) conveys more semantic context than an anonymous “see more.” Last trap: do not create circular link loops that artificially inflate internal PageRank without distributing juice to priority pages.
How can I verify that my site complies with best practices?
Use Google Search Console: Coverage section, Excluded tab. Pages marked “Detected, currently not indexed” are often poorly linked or buried too deep. Cross-reference with your Screaming Frog crawl to identify if it's a depth issue or a complete lack of links.
Also measure the distribution of internal PageRank using tools like OnCrawl or Botify (metric “InRank”). Your strategic pages should concentrate PageRank, not your legal mentions or terms and conditions. If your contact page has more internal PageRank than your flagship product page, your architecture needs revision.
- Scrape the site with Screaming Frog to detect orphan pages and click depth.
- Remove or reduce redundant template links (footer/sidebar) across the site.
- Add contextual editorial links to priority pages from the blog and guides.
- Use descriptive anchors rich in keywords, never generic ones.
- Check the distribution of internal PageRank via OnCrawl or Botify.
- Consult the Search Console to identify pages marked “Detected, not indexed” and diagnose the lack of links.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Un lien en footer a-t-il la même valeur qu'un lien dans le contenu éditorial ?
Combien de liens internes maximum par page sans risquer une pénalité ?
Les pages orphelines peuvent-elles être indexées via le sitemap XML ?
Faut-il utiliser du nofollow sur certains liens internes pour sculpter le PageRank ?
Quelle profondeur de clic maximale pour les pages stratégiques ?
🎥 From the same video 26
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 23/01/2018
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.