What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Google recommends migrating to HTTPS while ensuring that the migration is properly implemented, as in most cases, no significant drop in ranking should be observed if the migration is executed correctly.
32:00
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 57:17 💬 EN 📅 17/11/2014 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube (32:00) →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. 11:05 Googlebot rend-il vraiment les pages comme un utilisateur et faut-il s'en inquiéter ?
  2. 15:05 Les contenus masqués en 'Click to Expand' nuisent-ils vraiment à votre indexation ?
  3. 19:30 Les liens nofollow ne transmettent-ils vraiment aucun signal de classement ?
  4. 23:23 Pourquoi faut-il attendre 9 mois pour qu'un fichier de désaveu soit pleinement actif ?
  5. 28:26 Pourquoi Google accélère-t-il le cycle de mise à jour de Penguin ?
  6. 28:26 Penguin peut-il vraiment booster votre classement si vous nettoyez vos backlinks ?
  7. 35:30 Faut-il vraiment croiser canonicals et hreflang pour le SEO multilingue ?
  8. 35:30 Faut-il vraiment une URL canonique par langue ou Google simplifie-t-il à l'excès ?
  9. 47:50 Les données structurées suffisent-elles vraiment pour figurer dans le Knowledge Graph ?
  10. 53:31 Les erreurs HTTP 404 et 500 ont-elles vraiment un impact sur votre classement Google ?
  11. 55:04 Combien de temps un 503 peut-il durer avant que Google ne désindexe votre page ?
📅
Official statement from (11 years ago)
TL;DR

Google states that a properly executed HTTPS migration does not cause a significant drop in ranking in most cases. The emphasis is on the quality of the technical implementation: clean 301 redirects, valid SSL certificate, optimal server configuration. For SEO, this means that the risk of losing organic traffic lies less in the protocol itself than in migration errors.

What you need to understand

Why does Google emphasize the quality of the implementation?

Mueller's statement does not say that HTTPS has no impact, but that the impact is negligible if the migration is done correctly. Essentially, Google treats a HTTPS migration as a major URL change.

If you misconfigure your 301 redirects, if your SSL certificate has chain errors, or if you mix HTTP and HTTPS content (mixed content), you create conflicting signals. The engine then has to reevaluate each URL, which can temporarily affect visibility.

What does Google mean by a "properly implemented" migration?

Google expects you to handle each HTTP URL with a permanent 301 redirect to its HTTPS counterpart. No 302s, no redirect chains, no intermediate pages. The SSL certificate must cover all active subdomains.

The Search Console must be set up for the new HTTPS property, and you need to submit a new XML sitemap pointing to the secured URLs. Internal links must be updated to avoid unnecessary redirects. The crawl budget is limited: each redirect uses a request.

In which cases do we still observe drops?

Rank drops typically occur when the migration hides other problems. A site that loses 30% of traffic after switching to HTTPS has often neglected canonicalization, left orphan pages, or broken its internal linking.

Another common scenario: sites that migrate simultaneously with other changes (redesign, CMS change, URL restructuring). Google cannot isolate the cause of the drop. A HTTPS migration must be the only variable modified.

  • 301 Redirects: one per HTTP URL to its HTTPS equivalent, without chaining
  • Valid SSL Certificate: covers all active domains and subdomains
  • Resolved Mixed Content: no HTTP resources loaded on HTTPS pages
  • Updated Search Console: new HTTPS property configured
  • Updated XML Sitemap: all URLs in HTTPS submitted

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement align with what is observed on the ground?

Yes, but with an important nuance. Sites that strictly follow the migration protocol generally go through a floating phase of 2 to 4 weeks, during which Google recrawls and reevaluates the URLs. Visibility may fluctuate slightly and then stabilize.

Problems arise when technical teams underestimate the complexity. I've seen sites lose 40% of traffic because redirects pointed to 404 pages or because the robots.txt blocked HTTPS crawling. Google cannot guess your intentions.

What are the limits of this statement?

Mueller speaks of the "majority of cases", which implies that there are undocumented exceptions. [To be verified]: Google does not specify if certain industries or types of sites are more vulnerable. Do e-commerce sites with thousands of product pages undergo the same process as a blog with 50 articles?

Another vague point: the notion of "significant drop". For a site generating 100,000 monthly visits, losing 5% can represent 5,000 sessions. This is not negligible. Google does not provide any numeric thresholds.

In what contexts does this rule not apply?

If your site combines HTTPS migration with structural redesign, Mueller's assurances no longer hold. The same logic applies if you change your domain name simultaneously: too many variables at play.

Sites with a history of penalties or existing technical issues (mass duplication, keyword cannibalization) should expect turbulence. HTTPS does not fix existing SEO flaws; it sometimes reveals them.

Warning: A successful HTTPS migration requires a complete prior audit. If your site has 404 errors, redirect chains, or duplicate content, resolve these issues BEFORE migrating. Otherwise, you risk attributing drops caused by previous flaws to HTTPS.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do concretely before the migration?

Start with a thorough technical audit. List all active HTTP URLs, identify existing redirects, and pinpoint potential mixed content. Test your SSL certificate in a staging environment before going live.

Prepare a rollback plan: if the migration fails, you must be able to revert in less than 30 minutes. Document each redirect, each server configuration change. An Excel spreadsheet is not enough: use a URL mapping tool.

What mistakes should absolutely be avoided during the switch?

Never initiate a HTTPS migration on a Friday night or just before a long weekend. You need to monitor server logs and the Search Console in real-time for 48 to 72 hours.

Avoid redirect chains: HTTP to WWW, then WWW to HTTPS. This results in a loss of PageRank and crawl budget. Configure a single redirect from non-WWW HTTP to WWW HTTPS (or vice versa depending on your canonical domain choice).

How can you verify that the migration went well?

Monitor the Search Console: coverage errors should remain stable or diminish, not explode. Check that Google indexes the new HTTPS URLs using the site:votredomaine.com command. If HTTP URLs persist in the index after 3 weeks, force their recrawl.

Analyze your positions for your strategic queries with a rank tracking tool. A fluctuation of ±3 positions is normal. A drop of 10+ positions on multiple keywords indicates a technical issue that needs immediate investigation.

  • Audit all HTTP URLs and prepare a complete redirect mapping
  • Test the SSL certificate in a staging environment before production
  • Set up the new HTTPS property in Google Search Console
  • Update all internal links to point directly to HTTPS
  • Submit an XML sitemap containing only HTTPS URLs
  • Monitor server logs and 4xx/5xx errors for 72 hours post-migration
A well-orchestrated HTTPS migration relies on meticulous preparation and constant monitoring. Temporary fluctuations are normal, but a sustained drop signals an implementation error. If your technical infrastructure is complex or you lack internal resources to manage this transition, engaging a specialized SEO agency can help you avoid costly mistakes and ensure a migration without loss of visibility.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Combien de temps dure la période de flottement après une migration HTTPS ?
Généralement entre 2 et 4 semaines. Google doit recrawler vos URLs, réévaluer les signaux et transférer l'autorité. Une stabilisation au-delà de 6 semaines indique un problème technique.
Faut-il garder les redirections 301 HTTP vers HTTPS indéfiniment ?
Oui, elles doivent rester actives de manière permanente. Même si Google a reindexé vos pages HTTPS, des backlinks externes pointent encore vers HTTP. Supprimer les redirections casserait ces liens.
Le HTTPS est-il un facteur de classement direct ?
Oui, mais son poids est faible comparé au contenu ou aux backlinks. Google a confirmé en 2014 que HTTPS donne un léger avantage, surtout en cas d'égalité avec un concurrent HTTP.
Peut-on migrer progressivement section par section ?
C'est techniquement possible mais déconseillé. Vous créez une situation où HTTP et HTTPS coexistent, ce qui complique la canonicalisation et dilue les signaux. Privilégiez une bascule complète.
Comment traiter les backlinks pointant vers HTTP après migration ?
Les redirections 301 transfèrent l'autorité des backlinks. Idéalement, contactez les sites référents importants pour mettre à jour les liens, mais ce n'est pas critique grâce aux redirections permanentes.
🏷 Related Topics
HTTPS & Security AI & SEO Redirects

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 17/11/2014

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.