Official statement
Other statements from this video 1 ▾
Google requires the addition of the nofollow attribute on all paid links, including those in image form. The goal is to prevent the transfer of PageRank to advertiser websites. For SEO practitioners, this means regularly auditing your clients' advertising spaces and training sales teams on best practices for marking sponsored links.
What you need to understand
Why does Google place such importance on nofollow for paid links?
Google's position has been clear from the start: paid links should not influence organic search results. PageRank represents a vote of confidence from one page to another. When this vote is bought instead of won naturally, it skews the ranking system.
The rel="nofollow" attribute tells crawlers not to follow the link and most importantly, not to transfer SEO juice. It's a technical barrier that separates editorial content from commercial spaces. Without this distinction, any site could buy its way to the top of the SERPs.
Are image links really subject to this rule?
Many practitioners still believe that only text links pass PageRank. This is a common misconception. Google treats image links just like standard text links in terms of value transfer.
A clickable ad banner, even without a visible text anchor, is still an HTML link pointing to a target URL. The crawler follows this link and can potentially transfer PageRank if the nofollow attribute is absent. The form of the link (text, image, button) does not matter to the algorithm.
What are the actual risks for a site that does not comply with this directive?
Google views paid links without nofollow as an attempt to manipulate rankings. In the best-case scenario, the algorithm simply ignores these links. In the worst-case scenario, a manual penalty for artificial link schemes can hit both the selling site AND the buying site.
The situation becomes even riskier for platforms that sell advertising space on a large scale. A systematic oversight of nofollow on thousands of links can trigger a manual action that is difficult to reverse. Reconsiderations take weeks and require a complete cleaning of the link profile.
- The nofollow attribute is mandatory on all paid links, regardless of their form (text, image, banner)
- PageRank is transferred through image links just like through standard text links
- Penalties can target both the seller and the buyer of nofollow-less advertising spaces
- Advertising platforms should automate the tagging to avoid large-scale human errors
- The absence of nofollow is a violation of guidelines even if the intent was not manipulative
SEO Expert opinion
Is Google's position consistent with what we observe on the field?
The theory is clear, but the reality of the commercial web is more nuanced. Thousands of editorial sites monetize their content through advertising networks that do not always tag links as nofollow. Yet, there is not a massive wave of manual penalties.
Two possible explanations. Either algorithms automatically detect these commercial links and devalue them without human intervention. Or Google prioritizes cases of blatant manipulation and tolerates unintentional technical oversights. [To verify] as there is no public data confirming either hypothesis.
Does nofollow really suffice to protect a site?
The nofollow attribute remains the official solution recommended by Google. However, since the introduction of the rel="sponsored" and rel="ugc" attributes in 2019, the situation has become more complicated. Google now treats these attributes as hints rather than absolute directives.
In practice, using rel="sponsored" on paid links offers more transparency than generic nofollow. This allows Google to better understand the commercial nature of the link without ambiguity. For sites monetizing their traffic, this distinction becomes a marker of proactive compliance.
What gray areas remain in this directive?
The boundary between editorial content and sponsored content becomes blurred in some modern formats. Should a sponsored native article with a contextual link to the partner brand carry a nofollow? And what about affiliate links in genuine product comparison reviews?
Google maintains a strict position: any link generating financial compensation must be tagged. But this rule conflicts with the reality of content marketing. An honest and detailed product test can legitimately include a link to the manufacturer without it being manipulation. [To verify] depending on human interpretation during a manual review.
Practical impact and recommendations
How to audit existing paid links on a site?
The first reflex: export all outgoing links via Screaming Frog or Sitebulb. Then filter by known destination domains such as advertisers or business partners. Check for the presence of the nofollow or sponsored attribute in the source code of each affected page.
For sites using third-party advertising networks (Google AdSense, Taboola, Outbrain), inspect the injected JavaScript code. These platforms should automatically generate the appropriate attributes. If not, contact the technical support of the network to demand compliance.
Should all old sponsored content be retroactively modified?
Yes, absolutely. Google grants no immunity to historical content. A sponsored article published three years ago without nofollow presents the same risk as recent content. Prioritize pages that are still receiving organic traffic or ranking for strategic queries.
Automate this correction via a script that identifies commercial patterns (URLs containing tracking parameters, recurring partner domains, legal mentions of "sponsored article"). For WordPress CMS, plugins like Link Attributes allow for bulk addition of nofollow based on predefined rules.
What technical errors lead to forgetting nofollow?
The classic mistake: an editor manually adds a paid link in the WYSIWYG editor without checking the nofollow box. The CMS then generates a dofollow link by default. The same problem exists with page builders (Elementor, Divi) that do not always expose the nofollow option in their interface.
Another common trap: 301 redirects on paid links. Some advertisers request links to pass through their tracking system via a redirect. If the initial link has a nofollow but the redirect page contains a dofollow link to the final destination, PageRank can still leak. Check the entire chain.
- Audit all destination domains of outgoing links to identify commercial relationships
- Verify that third-party advertising networks automatically implement nofollow or sponsored
- Retroactively correct historical sponsored content that is still indexed
- Train editorial teams on best practices for marking paid links
- Implement automatic alerts for the emergence of new suspicious dofollow outgoing links
- Document in internal guidelines the distinction between editorial and commercial links
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
L'attribut nofollow doit-il être placé sur le lien ou sur l'image elle-même ?
Peut-on utiliser rel="sponsored" à la place de nofollow pour les liens publicitaires ?
Un lien d'affiliation Amazon doit-il absolument porter un nofollow ?
Si Google AdSense gère mes bannières, dois-je quand même vérifier le nofollow ?
Le nofollow protège-t-il contre toutes les pénalités liées aux liens commerciaux ?
🎥 From the same video 1
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1 min · published on 26/05/2011
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.