Official statement
Other statements from this video 21 ▾
- 1:22 Pourquoi Google retarde-t-il la migration mobile-first de certains sites ?
- 3:10 Le mobile-first indexing améliore-t-il vraiment votre positionnement dans Google ?
- 5:13 Faut-il vraiment traiter tous les problèmes Search Console en urgence ?
- 7:07 Faut-il vraiment optimiser les ancres de liens internes ou est-ce du temps perdu ?
- 8:42 Faut-il vraiment éviter d'avoir plusieurs pages sur le même mot-clé ?
- 9:58 Peut-on prouver la qualité éditoriale d'un contenu à Google avec des balises structured data ?
- 11:33 Faut-il vraiment respecter les types de pages supportés pour le schema reviewed-by ?
- 14:02 Le cloaking technique est-il vraiment toléré par Google ?
- 19:36 Comment Google groupe-t-il vos URL pour prioriser son crawl ?
- 22:04 Pourquoi votre trafic chute-t-il vraiment après une pause de publication ?
- 24:16 Pourquoi Google Discover est-il plus exigeant que la recherche classique pour afficher vos contenus ?
- 26:31 Le structured data non supporté influence-t-il vraiment le ranking ?
- 28:37 Les erreurs techniques d'un domaine principal pénalisent-elles vraiment ses sous-domaines ?
- 30:44 Pourquoi vos review snippets disparaissent-ils puis réapparaissent chaque semaine ?
- 32:16 Les backlinks déposés manuellement dans les forums et commentaires sont-ils vraiment inutiles pour le SEO ?
- 34:55 Pourquoi vos commentaires Disqus ne s'indexent-ils pas tous de la même manière ?
- 44:52 Pourquoi Google confond-il vos pages locales avec des doublons à cause des patterns d'URL ?
- 48:00 Pourquoi les redirections 404 vers la homepage détruisent-elles le crawl budget ?
- 50:51 Faut-il vraiment utiliser unavailable_after pour gérer les événements passés sur votre site ?
- 50:51 Pourquoi votre no-index massif met-il 6 mois à 1 an pour être traité par Google ?
- 55:39 Les URL plates nuisent-elles vraiment à la compréhension de Google ?
Google claims not to use Domain Authority in its ranking algorithm. This third-party metric remains relevant for evaluating a site's overall health but should not become the sole compass for your strategic choices. The challenge for practitioners: understanding the actual signals Google uses to assess domain authority, beyond simplified scores.
What you need to understand
Why Does Google Explicitly Reject Domain Authority?
Domain Authority (DA) is a metric developed by Moz that assigns a score from 0 to 100 to each domain. Google goes out of its way to clarify that it is not a ranking factor in its algorithm.
The confusion arises because DA often correlates with SEO performance — but correlation is not causation. Google uses hundreds of proprietary signals to assess a site's authority, none of which can be distilled into a single score.
What’s the Difference Between DA and the Actual Signals Used by Google?
Domain Authority mainly relies on the inbound link profile analyzed by Moz — number, quality, and diversity of backlinks. It's an external approximation of what a domain's authority might be.
Google, however, has infinitely richer data: domain history, user behavior, content quality, demonstrated expertise, trust signals (HTTPS, EEAT mentions), technical performance, and dozens of other factors that no one can replicate from the outside.
Should You Completely Abandon This Metric in Your Workflow?
No, and this is where nuance matters. DA remains a quick comparative indicator for evaluating a competitor, prioritizing link-building opportunities, or tracking the overall progress of a domain.
The trap would be to make it a goal in itself. Artificially increasing your DA by accumulating low-quality links will have no effect on Google positions — and may even trigger penalties. It's a thermometer, not a lever.
- Google does not use any third-party metric (DA, DR, TrustFlow, etc.) in its ranking algorithm.
- These scores remain useful for competitive analysis and strategic prioritization — as long as you don’t fetishize them.
- The actual authority of a domain is built on multiple signals: quality of backlinks, thematic relevance, demonstrated expertise, publication history, user behavior.
- Aiming to increase DA as the main objective often leads to counterproductive practices (link buying, PBNs, over-optimization).
- A site with a modest DA can significantly outperform a competitor with a high DA if its content better meets search intent and demonstrates superior expertise.
SEO Expert opinion
Is This Statement Consistent with Ground Observations?
Absolutely. We regularly see sites with a DA below 30 dominating competitive queries against domains rated 60+. The reason? They better respond to search intent, demonstrate real expertise, and have built a relevant link profile rather than a massive one.
The problem is that many SEO tools continue to present DA as a key KPI in their dashboards. This creates a cognitive bias: we end up optimizing for an external score rather than for the real signals that Google values.
What Alternative Metrics Better Reflect Authority According to Google?
Let’s be honest: no single metric captures what Google calls “authority.” But some indicators come closer to reality. Organic traffic on competitive queries, for example, proves that Google does indeed trust your domain.
EEAT signals (Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) have become central — and they are not limited to backlinks. A site may have a modest backlink profile but demonstrate exemplary expertise through the quality of its authors, depth of content, external citations, and mentions in specialized press. [To be verified]: Google has never detailed how these EEAT signals are technically measured and weighted.
In Which Cases Does DA Remain Relevant Despite Everything?
For strategic link building, DA remains a quick filter. When assessing 50 link opportunities, sorting by DA allows you to eliminate clearly weak domains. But it's a first filter, not a verdict.
Similarly for competitive analysis: comparing the evolution of your site's DA versus your competitors provides a macro trend on market dynamics. If all your competitors are climbing and you are stagnating, it likely signals a problem in your content or link strategy — even if DA itself doesn’t matter for Google.
Practical impact and recommendations
What Should You Actually Do to Build Real Authority?
Stop steering your SEO strategy by checking your DA every morning. Focus on the fundamentals that Google truly values: publishing expert content that showcases real-world experience, acquiring links from thematically relevant sources, building a measurable reputation (citations, mentions, reviews).
In practice? If you are hesitating between two backlink opportunities, don’t automatically choose the one with the highest DA. Favor the one that brings qualified traffic, shares your target audience, and whose contextual anchor enhances your thematic relevance.
What Mistakes Should You Avoid When Trying to Increase Your Authority?
The classic mistake: buying links on platforms that sell DA. Guaranteed results: a score that artificially rises, zero impact on your Google positions, and a risk of manual penalty if the profile becomes clearly manipulated.
Another trap: neglecting on-site signals in favor of link building. Google evaluates authority holistically. A site with 1000 backlinks but mediocre content, disastrous UX, and no identifiable authors will never be perceived as authoritative — no matter its DA.
How Can You Effectively Measure the Evolution of Your Real Authority?
Track metrics that reflect the real trust from Google: changes in organic traffic on competitive queries, click-through rates on given positions, number of featured snippets obtained, volume of brand queries. These signals prove that Google regards you as a reliable source.
Complement with a qualitative analysis of your link profile: instead of counting backlinks, identify the referring domains that truly bring juice — those sending traffic, those cited by other authoritative sources, those that enhance your topical authority. These optimizations often require sharp expertise and an outside perspective to avoid costly mistakes. Working with a specialized SEO agency may be wise to structure this approach and maximize the impact of every action.
- Stop setting DA goals in your KPIs — instead, measure the evolution of organic traffic and positions on your strategic keywords.
- Audit your link profile to identify and disavow toxic backlinks that pollute your real authority without improving your DA.
- Strengthen your EEAT signals: add detailed author bios, cite your sources, get external mentions in your field.
- Prioritize quality over quantity in your link-building strategy — a link from a thematically relevant site is worth more than 10 generic links with high DA.
- Invest in content that demonstrates real expertise: case studies, proprietary data, in-depth analyses — not generic content optimized for an external score.
- Monitor the evolution of your competitors on real metrics (positions, traffic, featured snippets) rather than on their comparative DA.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Si Google n'utilise pas le Domain Authority, pourquoi cette métrique corrèle-t-elle souvent avec les positions ?
Dois-je arrêter de suivre le Domain Authority dans mes outils SEO ?
Un site avec un faible DA peut-il vraiment surperformer un concurrent à DA élevé ?
Quelle métrique alternative utiliser pour évaluer l'autorité d'un domaine ?
Les autres métriques tierces (Domain Rating, Trust Flow) sont-elles plus fiables que le DA ?
🎥 From the same video 21
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 23/06/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.