What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

It is crucial to carry out the redirects in a domain migration consistently and thoroughly to avoid prolonged traffic losses.
156:05
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h19 💬 EN 📅 24/08/2018 ✂ 15 statements
Watch on YouTube (156:05) →
Other statements from this video 14
  1. 6:10 Faut-il vraiment supprimer les sitemaps vides de votre site ?
  2. 15:23 Le HTTPS booste-t-il vraiment vos positions Google ou est-ce une légende SEO ?
  3. 16:05 Pourquoi votre migration HTTPS risque-t-elle de perturber votre indexation Google ?
  4. 21:13 Les dates structurées influencent-elles vraiment le SEO de vos articles ?
  5. 26:12 Une mise à jour algorithmique peut-elle vraiment ne rien cibler en particulier ?
  6. 37:44 Le contenu dupliqué est-il vraiment sans danger pour votre référencement ?
  7. 60:52 Google peut-il vraiment lire les graphiques sur vos pages web ?
  8. 84:00 Le lazy loading d'images nuit-il vraiment à votre indexation Google ?
  9. 87:00 Les domaines expirés recyclés subissent-ils vraiment des pénalités manuelles de Google ?
  10. 105:50 Singulier ou pluriel : Google classe-t-il vraiment différemment ?
  11. 125:16 Les visites directes influencent-elles vraiment le classement Google ?
  12. 128:38 Pourquoi modifier les balises canonical et robots en JavaScript peut-il nuire à votre SEO ?
  13. 136:10 Faut-il vraiment utiliser le code 410 plutôt que le 404 pour accélérer la désindexation ?
  14. 180:07 Pourquoi rediriger toutes vos pages vers la home en migration tue votre SEO ?
📅
Official statement from (7 years ago)
TL;DR

Google emphasizes the absolute necessity of redirects during a domain migration. Incomplete or rushed implementations lead to traffic losses that can last for months. Specifically, every URL from the old domain must redirect to the correct target on the new one, without exception or approximation.

What you need to understand

Why is Google so focused on the consistency of redirects?

A domain migration remains one of the riskiest operations in SEO. The transfer of authority between the old and new domain relies entirely on the quality of the redirect mapping. If Googlebot encounters URLs from the old domain that return 404s or redirect to the wrong page, it cannot transfer PageRank or historical signals.

The notion of consistency means that every URL from the old site must have a logical destination on the new one. Redirecting to the homepage by default? Catastrophic. Chained redirects (301 → 302 → 301)? Loss of signal. Google’s crawl must encounter a clean and direct redirect pattern, ideally a permanent 301.

What does Google mean by "complete" in this context?

Complete means 100% coverage. Not 95%, not "the main pages." All indexed URLs from the old domain must redirect. This includes URLs forgotten in old sitemaps, paginated pages, GET parameters, case variations, trailing slashes.

The actual indexing surface of a site often far exceeds what the owner imagines. A extraction via Search Console, server logs, and historical sitemaps is essential to establish a comprehensive inventory. URLs that still receive active backlinks must be a top priority.

What are the real risks of a poorly executed migration?

Traffic losses observed from hasty migrations range from 30% to 70%, and recovery takes between 3 to 12 months. Some sites never regain their initial level. Google must recrawl the old domain, follow the redirects, reevaluate the new domain, and recalculate relevance signals.

The full propagation time of redirects in the index can take several weeks, even with an optimal crawl budget. During this period, the site faces maximum competitive vulnerability. SERPs fluctuate, historical positions degrade, and competitors gain ground.

  • Map each URL from the old to the new domain with a 1:1 match whenever possible
  • Prioritize the permanent 301 for all migration redirects
  • Avoid chained redirects and redirects to the default homepage
  • Keep the old domain active with redirects for at least 6 months
  • Monitor the crawl budget via Search Console to detect redirect tracking anomalies

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement truly reflect ground reality?

Yes, but with a significant nuance: Google does not specify how long recovery will take, nor what tolerance exists for minor errors. Perfect migrations do not exist. On a site with 50,000 URLs, there will always be 1-2% of edge cases that are unmapped. The real question becomes: what error threshold remains acceptable?

Field observations show that an error rate below 5% of crawled URLs can be absorbed without dramatic impact, provided these errors do not concern strategic pages. A 404 on a page receiving 10 visits/month? Negligible. A 404 on a hub page with 50 backlinks? Catastrophic. [To be verified]: Google has never published an official tolerance threshold.

What common mistakes are never mentioned by Google?

The statement remains silent on simultaneous HTTPS migrations. Many sites combine domain change + switching to HTTPS, which multiplies the risk of errors. Redirects must then manage HTTP/HTTPS variants from both the old AND the new domain.

Another blind spot: changes in URL structure. If the old site used /category/product/ and the new one uses /product/, the mapping becomes complex. Google implicitly assumes that the structure remains stable, which is rarely the case in practice. Sites that simultaneously switch domains, CMS, and hierarchy accumulate risk factors.

In what cases does this recommendation become insufficient?

For very large sites (> 100K URLs), managing redirects purely through .htaccess files becomes unmanageable. It is necessary to resort to programmatic solutions (regex, mapping databases) that introduce their own set of potential bugs. Google provides no guidance on these complex architectures.

Sites with a strong international component must manage hreflang alongside migration. Language/region signals must be transferred correctly, adding a layer of complexity. A well-executed redirect but with broken hreflang creates ambiguity for Google.

Warning: Domain migrations involving sites with a history of manual or algorithmic penalties may see these penalties follow the new domain through redirects. Google retains a memory of negative signals.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do before launching the migration?

The comprehensive inventory of URLs is the critical phase. Extract all URLs from Search Console (Performance + Coverage), historical XML sitemaps, server logs for at least 3 months, and backlink analysis tools. Cross-reference these sources to obtain the complete list. URLs that have not received any crawl or traffic for 6 months may be candidates for deletion rather than redirection.

Build a mapping file in CSV format with three columns: old URL, new URL, target HTTP code. Test this mapping in a staging environment before any production deployment. Use scripts to check that each redirect points to a URL that responds with 200, not another redirect or a 404.

How can you monitor the migration once it’s launched?

Immediately activate the new property in Search Console and declare the address change via the dedicated tool. This tool is only available if both the old and new domains are verified in the same Search Console account. It accelerates processing on Google’s side but does not exempt you from ensuring clean redirects.

Monitor daily during the first 2 weeks: crawl rate of the old domain (must remain high), appearance of the new domain URLs in the index, 4xx/5xx errors, loading times. Server logs can show whether Googlebot is correctly following redirects or looping on certain URLs. An unusual spike in server errors often indicates a configuration problem.

What mistakes should absolutely be avoided?

Never delete the old domain or disable redirects before at least 6 months. Some external backlinks take months to be recrawled. If Google follows a backlink to the old domain 4 months after migration and finds a 404, the signal is permanently lost.

Avoid temporary 302 redirects for a permanent migration. Google interprets them as provisional and continues to favor the old URL in the index. The transfer of authority is then partial or nonexistent. If you mistakenly used a 302, correct it immediately to a 301, but recovery will take additional time.

  • Extract a complete inventory of URLs from Search Console, sitemaps, and server logs
  • Create a CSV mapping file with old URL → new URL → expected HTTP code
  • Test redirects in a staging environment before production
  • Declare the address change in Search Console immediately upon going live
  • Keep the old domain and its redirects active for at least 6 months
  • Monitor crawl, indexing, and errors daily during the first 2 weeks
A successful domain migration relies on three pillars: comprehensive inventory, clean 301 redirects, and intensive post-launch monitoring. Complex or high-stakes commercial sites often benefit from partnering with an experienced SEO agency that masters crawling tools, validation scripts, and monitoring protocols. The initial investment in expert support drastically limits the risks of irreversible traffic loss.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Combien de temps faut-il maintenir les redirections 301 après une migration de domaine ?
Minimum 6 mois, idéalement 12 mois ou de manière permanente si le coût d'hébergement de l'ancien domaine reste négligeable. Certains backlinks externes sont recrawlés très rarement par Google.
Peut-on utiliser des redirections 302 temporaires pour tester une migration avant de basculer en 301 ?
Non, c'est contre-productif. Les 302 indiquent à Google que le changement est provisoire, ce qui retarde ou empêche le transfert d'autorité. Teste en staging puis bascule directement en 301.
Faut-il rediriger toutes les URLs ou seulement celles qui ont du trafic ?
Toutes les URLs indexées doivent rediriger, même celles sans trafic actuel. Elles peuvent recevoir des backlinks externes que Google suivra des mois après la migration. Une URL indexée sans redirection devient un 404 qui nuit au transfert global d'autorité.
Que faire des URLs de l'ancien site qui n'ont pas d'équivalent sur le nouveau ?
Redirige vers la page la plus proche sémantiquement (catégorie parente, page thématique). En dernier recours, vers la homepage, mais cela dilue le signal. Évite de laisser ces URLs en 404 si elles sont indexées.
Les redirections en chaîne sont-elles vraiment problématiques ou Google les suit-il quand même ?
Google suit les chaînes courtes (2-3 sauts) mais avec déperdition de signal à chaque étape. Les chaînes longues (4+ sauts) sont souvent abandonnées. Chaque redirection intermédiaire ralentit le crawl et dilue l'autorité transférée.
🏷 Related Topics
AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Domain Name Redirects

🎥 From the same video 14

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h19 · published on 24/08/2018

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.