Official statement
Other statements from this video 9 ▾
- 0:36 Google Search évolue constamment : qu'est-ce que ça change vraiment pour votre stratégie SEO ?
- 10:53 Le recrawl via Search Console : un levier vraiment efficace pour accélérer l'indexation de vos modifications ?
- 17:42 Googlebot utilise-t-il vraiment un Chrome moderne pour crawler votre site ?
- 21:40 L'indexation mobile-first couvre-t-elle vraiment plus de 50 % des sites — et qu'est-ce que ça change pour vous ?
- 28:36 Google peut-il réécrire vos titres de page sans votre permission ?
- 36:58 Comment optimiser vos images pour qu'elles soient réellement indexées par Google ?
- 50:36 Le structured data améliore-t-il vraiment la visibilité dans les SERP ?
- 57:17 Les balisages How-to et Q&A changent-ils vraiment la donne en SEO ?
- 61:53 L'Index Coverage Report : comment l'exploiter pour corriger vos erreurs d'indexation ?
Google claims that Googlebot explores the web by following links and recommends two methods to make a site known: getting backlinks or submitting through Search Console. This statement raises a strategic question: should you prioritize natural link building or push for manual submissions? The answer dictates your resource allocation between link building and technical monitoring.
What you need to understand
Does Googlebot operate solely by discovering links?
The crawl of Googlebot is based on a simple principle: the bot follows links like a breadcrumb trail across the web. Each crawled page potentially contains dozens or even hundreds of outbound links that Googlebot will add to its crawl queue.
This mechanism explains why an isolated site, without any inbound links, can remain invisible for weeks or months. Google does not guess the existence of your site — it discovers it. Submission via Search Console bypasses this principle by directly informing Google of the existence of a URL or a sitemap.
What’s the difference between manual submission and natural discovery?
Submitting a sitemap through Search Console does not guarantee indexing, contrary to what many believe. Google acknowledges the existence of the URLs but then applies its own crawl prioritization criteria.
A site with quality backlinks will be crawled more frequently and more deeply than a manually submitted site lacking external signals. PageRank, even though it is no longer publicly displayed, remains a determining factor in the allocation of crawl budget.
Do internal links matter as much as backlinks for crawling?
Googlebot first discovers your site through external links, but subsequently navigates through your internal linking. An orphan page — without internal or external linking — will never be crawled, even if it exists in your sitemap.
The depth of the crawl directly depends on the link structure. A page that is 5 clicks deep from the homepage will be visited less frequently than a page accessible in 1 click, unless it receives direct backlinks that boost its priority.
- Googlebot discovers sites via links — a site without backlinks remains invisible without manual submission
- Search Console submission speeds up discovery but does not replace link building for crawl frequency
- Internal linking determines crawl depth — orphan pages are ignored even if listed in the sitemap
- Backlinks influence crawl budget — the more a site receives quality links, the more frequently it is crawled
- Submitting a sitemap does not guarantee indexing — Google decides based on quality and priority criteria
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement complete or overly simplified?
Martin Splitt presents here the official version, polished for the general public. In reality, Googlebot uses many other signals to discover content: robots.txt files, XML sitemaps, RSS feeds, structured data, and even 301 redirects.
To say that Googlebot "follows links" is technically accurate but omits all the complexity of algorithmic prioritization. Google does not crawl everything — it makes choices based on PageRank, content freshness, update velocity, and behavioral signals. [To verify]: some SEOs observe that sites with high direct traffic are crawled more aggressively, even without massive backlinks.
Is submission via Search Console really necessary in 2025?
For an already established site with solid link building, submitting a sitemap is more about convenience than obligation. Google will discover your new pages through natural crawling, especially if your internal linking is optimized.
On the other hand, for a new site, time-sensitive content (news, events) or deep pages that are hard to access, manual submission remains an effective tactical lever. Not submitting a sitemap for an e-commerce site with 10,000 products would be a mistake — Google could take weeks to discover certain product sheets through internal links alone.
What are the practical limits of this approach?
Relying solely on natural crawling via links exposes you to two risks. First risk: the discovery delay. If your content depends on a time window (promotion, buzz, seasonality), waiting for Googlebot to stumble upon it by chance could kill your opportunity.
Second risk: the limited crawl depth. Googlebot allocates a crawl budget per site. On a massive site, some pages will never be visited if they are too deep or poorly linked. Observing server logs often reveals that 30 to 40% of URLs on a large site are never crawled, even with a sitemap.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you prioritize: backlinks or Search Console submission?
The answer depends on your context. For a new site, submitting the XML sitemap via Search Console is essential — it’s the quickest signal to inform Google of your existence. But don’t stop there.
In parallel, work on your link building strategy: quality directories, guest posts, partnerships, link baiting. A backlink from an authoritative site will have a much greater impact on the crawl budget than 100 manual submissions. Think long-term.
How to optimize Googlebot's crawl on an existing site?
Start by analyzing your server logs. Identify which sections are under-crawled, which URLs are visited too often (wasting crawl budget), and which important pages are ignored.
Next, adjust your internal linking to push strategic pages higher up the hierarchy. Remove or deindex low-value pages (infinite pagination, unnecessary facets, duplicate content). Every crawled URL consumes budget — allocate it wisely.
What mistakes to avoid when submitting a sitemap?
Never submit a sitemap filled with noindex URLs, blocked by robots.txt, or returning 404 errors. Google views this as a signal of poor technical quality and may reduce your crawl budget accordingly.
Another common mistake: submitting thousands of URLs without prioritization. A 50,000-line sitemap where 80% points to outdated or duplicate content is useless. Segment your sitemaps by content type, and use the <priority> tag consistently — even though Google says it doesn’t always respect it, it remains a useful indicator.
- Submit the XML sitemap via Search Console as soon as the site launches
- Analyze server logs every quarter to identify under-crawled areas
- Optimize internal linking to raise key pages to 1-2 clicks from the homepage
- Regularly clean the sitemap: remove noindex, 404, or robots.txt blocked URLs
- Obtain backlinks from authoritative sites to increase the allocated crawl budget
- Segment sitemaps by content type (products, categories, blog, etc.) for easier monitoring
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Faut-il obligatoirement soumettre un sitemap pour être indexé par Google ?
Pourquoi certaines pages de mon sitemap ne sont-elles jamais crawlées ?
Les liens internes ont-ils le même poids que les backlinks pour le crawl ?
Comment savoir si Googlebot crawle efficacement mon site ?
Un site sans backlinks peut-il être bien crawlé par Google ?
🎥 From the same video 9
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 40 min · published on 09/05/2019
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.