Official statement
Other statements from this video 6 ▾
- 1:36 Pourquoi HTTPS bloque-t-il l'accès à certaines fonctionnalités critiques pour le SEO ?
- 2:08 HTTPS booste-t-il vraiment le classement dans Google Search ?
- 2:40 Pourquoi migrer vers HTTPS déclenche-t-il les mêmes signaux qu'un déménagement de site complet ?
- 7:58 Faut-il vraiment maintenir les redirections HTTP vers HTTPS pour toujours ?
- 8:28 Les certificats SSL gratuits nuisent-ils au référencement Google ?
- 8:59 Faut-il vraiment craindre une migration HTTPS pour son classement SEO ?
Google claims to process HTTPS migrations in less than a week on most sites if the setup is correct. This time frame remains indicative — the key point is that 301 redirects work immediately for users. Therefore, the focus is less on the exact timing of the migration and more on the technical quality of the implementation: certificates, redirects, configuration files.
What you need to understand
What does this one-week timeframe actually mean?
When Mueller mentions a week, he refers to the time needed for Google to re-crawl, re-index, and consolidate signals between the HTTP and HTTPS versions of a site. It's not an instantaneous processing duration.
During this period, Googlebot discovers the 301 redirects, updates its index by gradually replacing HTTP URLs with their HTTPS equivalents, and transfers accumulated ranking signals. The site's crawl budget plays a crucial role here — a large site with millions of pages will naturally take longer than a small site with 50 pages.
Why does Google downplay the importance of timing?
The argument is simple: if the 301 redirects are set up correctly, users are immediately redirected to the HTTPS version. From a UX perspective, the migration is thus instantaneous.
However, this logic overlooks a crucial aspect for SEOs: during the transition period, position fluctuations are often observed, volatility in the SERPs, and sometimes even a temporary drop in organic traffic. The fact that Google needs a week to consolidate its signals means there is a float period during which the site is not fully stabilized in the index.
What conditions must be met for this timeframe to be respected?
Mueller sets a central condition: "provided everything is set up correctly". This statement encompasses several non-trivial technical checks.
This refers to permanent 301 redirects (not temporary 302 redirects), valid and up-to-date SSL/TLS certificates, updates in the Search Console to declare the new HTTPS property, and consistency in the robots.txt file and XML sitemap. A single misconfigured element — such as chained redirects or self-signed certificates — can significantly extend the timeframe.
- 301 Redirects: each HTTP URL must point to its exact HTTPS equivalent, without any intermediate redirect chains.
- SSL/TLS Certificate: valid, issued by a recognized authority, covering all subdomains if necessary.
- Search Console Update: declaration of the new HTTPS property, submission of an updated XML sitemap.
- Consistency in Configuration Files: robots.txt, canonical tags, hreflang (if multilingual) must all point to the HTTPS URLs.
- Crawl Error Monitoring: check for expired certificates, mixed content (HTTP resources on HTTPS pages), broken redirects.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this one-week timeframe consistent with field observations?
On medium-sized sites (10,000 to 50,000 pages), the one-week timeframe is generally realistic if the configuration is impeccable. Stabilization in the index is indeed observed within this time frame.
Conversely, on complex sites — multilingual e-commerce, millions of pages, siloed architecture, numerous subdomains — the timeframe often extends to two to three weeks, or even more. Google does not crawl everything simultaneously: it prioritizes pages based on their perceived importance (internal PageRank, update frequency, historical traffic). Deep or infrequently crawled pages may remain in HTTP in the index for several weeks. [To be verified] on very large sites with limited crawl budgets.
What nuances should be added to this statement?
Mueller glosses over a phenomenon regularly observed: the volatility of positions during the transition. Even if everything is technically correct, we often see ranking fluctuations for 7 to 14 days — some pages rise, while others temporarily drop.
This instability is explained by Google recalculating trust signals for the new HTTPS URLs. Backlinks still pointing to HTTP URLs pass through 301 redirects, which can lead to a slight dilution of PageRank (although Google claims there’s been no loss since 2016, field data remains ambiguous on this point).
In what cases does this rule not apply?
If the HTTPS migration is coupled with other structural changes — site redesign, modification of the hierarchy, CMS change — the timeframe explodes. Google then has to process multiple conflicting signals simultaneously: new URLs, new content, new architecture. The timeframe can extend to several months in these cases.
Another problematic case: sites with pre-existing poor SEO health. If the site already suffers from a limited crawl budget, indexing problems, or manual or algorithmic penalties, the HTTPS migration will only be an additional factor slowing things down. Let’s be honest: Google will not speed up the crawl of a site it considers low-quality just because it’s switching to HTTPS.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do concretely before and during the migration?
Before switching to HTTPS, you need to prepare the ground. This means installing a valid SSL/TLS certificate (Let's Encrypt, Comodo, DigiCert), configuring the 301 redirects at the server level (Apache, Nginx, IIS), and testing these redirects in a staging environment.
During the migration, monitor the Search Console like a hawk. Declare the new HTTPS property, submit an updated XML sitemap pointing to the HTTPS URLs, and track the evolution of the index coverage report. Any sudden spike in 4xx or 5xx errors should trigger an immediate alert.
What mistakes should absolutely be avoided?
The classic mistake: redirecting all HTTP traffic to the homepage in HTTPS instead of making one-to-one redirects. This breaks all backlinks, destroys link equity, and leads to a catastrophic traffic drop.
Another common pitfall: leaving resources in HTTP (images, scripts, CSS) on HTTPS pages. This generates mixed content errors in browsers, displays security warnings, and can block certain JavaScript functionalities. Google crawls these pages but may consider them partially broken.
How to verify that the migration is going smoothly?
Use the Search Console to compare the evolution of impressions and clicks between the HTTP and HTTPS properties. If, after a week, the majority of traffic isn’t shifting to HTTPS, something is wrong.
Conduct a complete crawl using Screaming Frog or Oncrawl to detect chained redirects, canonical tags pointing to HTTP, and internal links not updated. A well-migrated site should not contain any internal links pointing to HTTP URLs — everything must point directly to HTTPS.
- Install a valid SSL/TLS certificate covering all necessary subdomains.
- Configure permanent one-to-one 301 redirects (HTTP → HTTPS).
- Declare the HTTPS property in the Search Console and submit an updated XML sitemap.
- Ensure no mixed content (HTTP resources on HTTPS pages).
- Update all internal links to point directly to HTTPS.
- Monitor the index coverage report in the Search Console for at least two weeks.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Faut-il vraiment attendre une semaine avant de toucher à quoi que ce soit après la migration HTTPS ?
Les backlinks pointant vers les URLs HTTP perdent-ils de la valeur après la migration ?
Peut-on migrer progressivement en HTTPS, section par section, ou faut-il tout basculer d'un coup ?
Que faire si après deux semaines les URLs HTTP sont toujours majoritaires dans l'index ?
Faut-il redéclarer tous les backlinks, sitemaps externes et outils tiers après la migration HTTPS ?
🎥 From the same video 6
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 10 min · published on 01/09/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.