Official statement
Other statements from this video 12 ▾
- 9:53 Faut-il vraiment ignorer Schema.org pour les variantes de produits e-commerce ?
- 50:33 Pourquoi vos données structurées sabotent-elles votre Knowledge Panel ?
- 260:39 Le noindex des variantes produit contamine-t-il vraiment la page canonique ?
- 272:01 Le canonical seul suffit-il vraiment à contrôler l'indexation ?
- 409:18 Comment Google évalue-t-il vraiment les Core Web Vitals d'une page dans ses résultats de recherche ?
- 434:38 La pertinence l'emporte-t-elle vraiment sur les Core Web Vitals dans Google ?
- 540:44 Faut-il vraiment maintenir les redirections 301 pendant un an minimum ?
- 595:13 Faut-il vraiment implémenter hreflang dès le lancement d'un site multi-pays avec contenu similaire ?
- 614:30 Pourquoi le linking interne entre versions linguistiques accélère-t-il vraiment l'indexation d'un nouveau marché ?
- 647:54 Faut-il vraiment doubler hreflang avec du JavaScript pour la géolocalisation ?
- 693:12 Pourquoi Google met-il plusieurs mois à récompenser les améliorations qualité d'un site ?
- 856:03 Faut-il s'inquiéter d'avoir 90% de pages en noindex sur son site ?
Google barely distinguishes between a 404 code (page temporarily unavailable) and a 410 code (page permanently removed). The 410 slightly speeds up the removal from the index, but the difference is marginal. In the long run, both codes yield the same result: the page disappears from the index if it remains inaccessible.
What you need to understand
What is the technical difference between a 404 and a 410?<\/h3>
The 404 (Not Found)<\/strong> code indicates that a resource does not exist or is no longer available, without specifying whether this is a temporary or permanent condition. It is the default error code returned by most servers when a URL is not found.<\/p> The 410 (Gone)<\/strong> code explicitly indicates that the resource has been permanently removed and will not return. It conveys a clear intent: this page no longer exists, so do not look for it. Historically, this code was intended to speed up de-indexing by informing search engines that the content was gone for good.<\/p> Mueller clarifies that Google makes a slight distinction<\/strong> between the two codes, but that this difference has no significant impact<\/strong> on the final outcome. The 410 may accelerate index removal by a few days, but we are talking about a minor difference that does not warrant a redesign of the technical architecture.<\/p> In both cases, if a page consistently returns a 404 or 410 code during regular crawler visits, Google will eventually remove it from the index. The de-indexing delay is influenced more by the crawl frequency<\/strong> of your site and the authority of the page than by the HTTP code returned.<\/p> Many practitioners still believe that the 410 is essential for quickly cleaning the index, particularly on e-commerce sites with thousands of out-of-stock products. This belief stems from old recommendations where Google emphasized the distinction between temporary and permanent.<\/p> Mueller puts this debate to rest: the distinction is minor<\/strong>. Using a 404 by default will not penalize your site, and implementing a complex system to return 410s will only yield a marginal gain. This statement simplifies technical decisions and avoids over-investing in low-yield optimizations.<\/p>How does Google treat these two codes differently?<\/h3>
Why does this statement contradict certain SEO beliefs?<\/h3>
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?<\/h3>
Yes, completely. Crawl audits show that pages returning a persistent 404<\/strong> eventually disappear from the index after a few weeks, without a 410 significantly accelerating the process. A/B tests on high-volume sites confirm that the difference in delay remains under a week in most cases.<\/p> However, there are situations where the 410 can have psychological value: when you want to explicitly signal to Google that a page will never return (e.g., content removed for legal reasons). But even in this scenario, the gain remains marginal and does not justify heavy technical investment.<\/p> Mueller does not specify the average de-indexing delay<\/strong> for a 404 versus a 410. Saying that the difference is "minor" remains vague: is it 2 days, 5 days, 2 weeks? [To be verified]<\/strong> on sites with different authority levels and crawl frequencies.<\/p> Another absent point is the impact on crawl budget<\/strong>. If Google continues to crawl hundreds of 404 pages for weeks before removing them from the index, it consumes crawl budget that could be allocated to active pages. A 410 could theoretically reduce this load, but Google does not explicitly confirm it.<\/p> If a page returns an intermittent 404<\/strong> (available one day, error the next), Google considers it temporarily unavailable and keeps it in the index. In this case, an explicit 410 forces immediate de-indexing and avoids any ambiguity.<\/p> On sites with a limited crawl budget<\/strong> (millions of pages, low authority), every crawl of a dead page consumes valuable resources. In these conditions, consistently using a 410 for permanent removals may slightly improve crawl efficiency — but the impact is difficult to quantify without concrete data from Google.<\/p>What elements are missing from this statement?<\/h3>
In what cases does this rule not apply?<\/h3>
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you actually do with deleted pages?<\/h3>
If you are removing a page permanently, use a default 404 — that is sufficient. There’s no need to set up a complex system to return 410s unless you have a specific strategic reason (e.g., legal issues, removal of sensitive content).<\/p>
If the page has SEO value<\/strong> (backlinks, historical traffic), redirect it with a 301 to a relevant page rather than leaving a 404 or a 410. This approach preserves PageRank and improves user experience. The 404 or 410 should only apply to pages with no value or logical alternative.<\/p> Do not redirect all your 404 pages to the homepage with a 301 — this is a soft 404<\/strong> that Google detects and penalizes. If a page has no relevant equivalent, let the 404 do its job. Google prefers a clear error over a misleading redirect.<\/p> Avoid leaving hundreds of 404 pages lingering indefinitely in the index. Even if Google eventually removes them, they consume crawl budget<\/strong> and degrade user experience. Regularly monitor your Search Console reports to identify 404s that need to be handled (redirected or permanently removed).<\/p> Use the Coverage<\/strong> report in Search Console to identify excluded URLs with a 404 or 410 code. Ensure that these pages correspond to voluntary removals and do not generate valuable traffic or backlinks.<\/p> Regularly audit your server logs to spot repeated recrawls<\/strong> of 404 pages. If Google returns multiple times a week to hundreds of dead pages, it may signal an internal linking issue (internal links pointing to 404s) or poorly optimized crawl budget. These technical optimizations can become complex at scale — if you manage thousands of pages, working with a specialized SEO agency can help you structure an effective cleanup strategy and prioritize high-impact actions.<\/p>What mistakes should be avoided in error code management?<\/h3>
How can you check that your dead pages are being managed properly?<\/h3>
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Un 410 accélère-t-il vraiment la désindexation par rapport à un 404 ?
Dois-je convertir tous mes 404 en 410 pour nettoyer l'index plus rapidement ?
Un 404 consomme-t-il plus de crawl budget qu'un 410 ?
Que faire si une page 404 reçoit encore du trafic ou des backlinks ?
Comment surveiller les pages 404 dans mon site ?
🎥 From the same video 12
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 932h29 · published on 05/03/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →Related statements
Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations
Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.