What does Google say about SEO? /

Official statement

John Mueller explained during a webmaster hangout that having a good Core Web Vitals "score" (web performance, page loading time) didn't necessarily help a page get better indexed by the search engine: "Essentially, Core Web Vitals (...) don't play a role in the amount of information we look for and index on the website. In some cases, there's a small relationship between page speed and how quickly we can crawl it, but that's not necessarily the case. So this is an element where these two aspects are generally less related and not completely related."
📅
Official statement from (4 years ago)

What you need to understand

What's the Difference Between Indexing and Ranking in Google?

It's crucial to distinguish two fundamental concepts: indexing (the fact that a page is recorded in Google's database) and ranking (the position of that page in search results).

Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, FID) measure a page's user performance. According to this official statement, these metrics don't directly impact a page's ability to be indexed by Google.

Why Doesn't Improving CWV Solve Indexing Problems?

If a page isn't indexed, it generally stems from other factors: blocking robots.txt, noindex tag, duplicate content, insufficient quality, or deeper technical issues.

Optimizing loading times won't change these fundamental obstacles. A fast page that's blocked by robots.txt will remain non-indexed.

Is There Still an Indirect Link Between Speed and Indexing?

Google mentions that there's a slight correlation between a page's speed and how quickly Googlebot can crawl it. This concerns the crawl budget.

On very large sites, extremely slow pages can consume more crawler resources, potentially reducing the total number of pages crawled during a session.

  • CWV are not a direct indexing factor
  • They impact ranking, not presence in the index
  • An indirect relationship exists via crawl budget on large sites
  • Very slow pages can theoretically slow down crawling
  • Solving an indexing problem requires identifying the real technical cause

SEO Expert opinion

Is This Statement Consistent with Field Observations?

Absolutely. In 15 years of experience, I've found that indexing problems are always linked to concrete technical blockages: site architecture, deficient internal linking, restrictive directives, or content deemed irrelevant.

CWV have been a ranking factor since the Page Experience update, not an eligibility criterion for the index. This distinction is fundamental but often misunderstood by junior SEO practitioners.

What Important Nuances Should Be Added to This Statement?

Although CWV don't directly impact indexing, catastrophic performance (all scores in the red) can create problematic side effects.

On sites with thousands or millions of pages, server response times exceeding 3-5 seconds can effectively limit the crawl budget allocated by Google. The crawler optimizes its time and may decide to explore fewer pages if each request is too costly.

Warning: on very large e-commerce or media sites (50,000+ pages), don't neglect the impact of server performance on crawling. A TTFB exceeding 2 seconds can significantly reduce your crawl budget.

In What Cases Does Performance Still Affect Indexing?

Critical scenarios concern sites with heavy client-side JavaScript. If rendering requires more than 5 seconds and significant resources, Googlebot may abandon or partially index the content.

Similarly, frequent server timeouts (5xx errors) related to overload can prevent complete crawling. But these are then major technical problems, not simply perfectible CWV scores.

Practical impact and recommendations

How Do You Diagnose the Real Cause of an Indexing Problem?

Forget CWV if you have non-indexed pages. Focus on Google Search Console, "Coverage" or "Pages" section. Identify the exact status: excluded, blocked, discovered but not crawled, crawled but not indexed.

Then verify in order: your robots.txt file, your meta robots tags, content quality, technical accessibility (HTTP codes), and internal linking pointing to these pages.

Should You Still Optimize Core Web Vitals?

Absolutely, but for the right reasons. CWV directly impact your ranking in search results, particularly on mobile and in competitive sectors.

They also influence user experience and therefore your conversion rates. A fast page converts better, reduces bounce rate, and improves the behavioral signals that Google observes.

What Optimization Strategy Should You Adopt Concretely?

Prioritize your actions according to your situation. If you have indexing problems, first resolve the fundamental technical blockages. CWV will come later in your optimization roadmap.

On large sites, particularly monitor TTFB (Time To First Byte) and server response times, as they effectively impact the crawl budget allocated by Google.

  • Audit your non-indexed pages via Search Console to identify the real cause
  • Check robots.txt, XML sitemaps, and meta robots tags
  • Analyze the quality and uniqueness of problematic pages' content
  • Improve internal linking to strategic non-indexed pages
  • Optimize CWV to improve ranking, not indexing
  • On large sites (50k+ pages), monitor TTFB and server times
  • Use the "URL Inspection" tool to test Google rendering of your pages
  • Prioritize: solve indexing first, optimize performance second
Core Web Vitals are not an indexing criterion, but a ranking factor. If your pages aren't indexed, look for the cause in technical blockages (robots.txt, noindex, content quality) rather than in performance. However, on large sites, catastrophic server performance can indirectly limit crawling. Technical SEO optimization requires deep expertise to correctly diagnose indexing problems and prioritize actions. Given the growing complexity of technical factors and the constant evolution of algorithms, working with a specialized SEO agency can provide you with an accurate diagnosis and a personalized optimization strategy, tailored to your site's specific characteristics.
Domain Age & History Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Web Performance Local Search Search Console

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.