What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

It is advisable to redirect all HTTP pages to their HTTPS versions to avoid indexing problems between the two protocols.
25:43
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 56:37 💬 EN 📅 15/05/2018 ✂ 14 statements
Watch on YouTube (25:43) →
Other statements from this video 13
  1. 2:06 Google fusionne-t-il vraiment les pages similaires en une seule version indexée ?
  2. 4:34 Le pré-rendu basé sur l'user-agent est-il devenu la seule méthode recommandée par Google ?
  3. 5:49 Faut-il vraiment adapter la longueur de ses meta descriptions aux snippets Google ?
  4. 7:53 Faut-il bloquer la redirection automatique vers l'app mobile pour préserver son SEO ?
  5. 7:53 Les redirections furtives vers les applications mobiles sont-elles un frein au référencement ?
  6. 8:32 Google propose-t-il vraiment une révision manuelle SEO de votre site ?
  7. 9:40 Les canonicals JavaScript sont-elles vraiment ignorées par Google ?
  8. 11:17 Les PWA sont-elles vraiment indispensables pour le référencement naturel ?
  9. 16:56 Faut-il corriger les URLs marquées 'submitted URL not selected as canonical' ?
  10. 17:36 Faut-il supprimer un sitemap qui contient trop d'erreurs ?
  11. 19:40 Comment Google distingue-t-il réellement le contenu dupliqué des adresses identiques ?
  12. 37:33 Faut-il craindre de trop lier vers Wikipédia ou des sites d'autorité ?
  13. 42:06 Pourquoi les URL avec dièse (#) bloquent-elles l'indexation de vos pages Angular ?
📅
Official statement from (7 years ago)
TL;DR

Google recommends redirecting all HTTP pages to their HTTPS counterparts to prevent content duplication and indexing conflicts between the two protocols. Without systematic 301 redirects, you risk diluting your PageRank, creating keyword cannibalization, and losing visibility. This essentially means a complete migration plan, not just enabling an SSL certificate.

What you need to understand

Why does Google emphasize complete redirection to HTTPS?

Google treats HTTP and HTTPS as two distinct URLs. When you enable HTTPS without redirecting HTTP, you’re technically creating two identical versions of each page. This leads to pure duplicate content.

The engine then has to choose which version to index, resulting in conflicting signals. Backlinks point to HTTP, social shares do as well, but you want to push HTTPS. The result: dilution of authority, wasted crawl time, and rankings that fluctuate for no obvious reason.

What actually happens without 301 redirects?

Googlebot will crawl both protocols. It will spend crawl budget visiting http://example.com/page AND https://example.com/page. You are effectively halving your crawl efficiency on medium to large sites.

Worse, ranking signals get fragmented. An external link points to the HTTP version? This authority does not automatically transfer to HTTPS. Google can technically consolidate it, but it’s random and never optimal. You’re leaving the engine to decide for you, which is rarely a good strategy.

Is migrating to HTTPS just about installing a certificate?

No, and this is where many get it wrong. Installing an SSL certificate only makes the site accessible via HTTPS. It doesn’t automatically switch anything.

Without server configuration (permanent 301 redirects), without updating internal links, and without modifying the XML sitemap and robots.txt, you are simply operating under a dual protocol. This is exactly the scenario Mueller wants to help you avoid. Migrating to HTTPS is a complete technical project, not just a simple “activate SSL” button.

  • HTTP and HTTPS are two different URLs in Google's eyes, creating duplicate content if not managed properly
  • Systematic 301 redirects are essential for transferring authority and avoiding PageRank dilution
  • Crawl budget is split between the two protocols without redirects, impacting indexing on large sites
  • A complete HTTPS migration involves server, internal links, sitemaps, Search Console, and tracking backlinks
  • Ranking signals (backlinks, authority) do not consolidate automatically without explicit redirects

SEO Expert opinion

Is this recommendation really being implemented in practice?

Yes, and it's one of the few Google statements that perfectly aligns with practitioners' observations. The botched HTTPS migrations we routinely audit have one thing in common: absence or poor configuration of 301 redirects.

We still see sites responding with 200 on both protocols, with performance variations based on the version. Google ultimately makes a choice, but it takes weeks, and ranking fluctuations during this period can be severe. Mueller clearly states what needs to be done, there's no ambiguity here.

What are the most common mistakes despite this directive?

Chain redirection. Some sites go HTTP → HTTP www → HTTPS www. Three hops instead of one. Googlebot follows, but you lose authority at each hop and slow down the crawl.

Another common mistake is using 302 (temporary) redirects instead of 301 (permanent). Some CMS or hosting providers configure this by default. Google does not transfer ranking signals on 302, and you remain in a partial double indexing state for months.

Finally, non-migrated internal resources (images, CSS, JS still on HTTP) generate mixed content warnings. This isn’t technically an indexing issue, but it degrades UX, and Chrome blocks certain scripts, affecting Core Web Vitals.

Are there cases where this rule does not apply?

No. Zero legitimate exceptions. Even internal sites, intranets, and publicly accessible testing environments must manage this properly if they want to be indexed correctly.

Some might argue for legacy sites with thousands of static pages. Invalid argument: a server-side script (Apache mod_rewrite, Nginx rewrite, middleware) resolves this in three lines of configuration. If you can’t do it, you lack the skills to manage the site's SEO, period.

The only nuance involves sites that do not want to be intentionally indexed (staging, development). In that case, the noindex meta tag or blocking with robots.txt is more relevant than HTTPS. But once it comes to a production site, the complete HTTP → HTTPS redirection is not optional.

Practical impact and recommendations

How can you correctly migrate to HTTPS without losing rankings?

First, plan before you act. List all currently indexed URLs (Search Console, Crawling with Screaming Frog). Ensure your SSL certificate covers all necessary subdomains (wildcard if needed).

Set up server 301 redirects before announcing anything to Google. Test a sample of URLs: the redirect should be direct (HTTP → HTTPS in one hop), return a 301 code, and point to the exact canonical URL. No redirecting all pages to the homepage, which is a fatal error we still see too often.

What post-migration checks are essential?

Add the HTTPS property in Search Console and submit the XML sitemap in HTTPS version. Do not immediately delete the old HTTP property; keep it to monitor residual crawl errors.

Check that all internal links point to HTTPS (href, canonical, hreflang, Open Graph, Twitter Cards). A Screaming Frog audit filtering for “Protocol: HTTP” shows you what still needs correction. External resources (CDN, third-party widgets) must also switch to HTTPS to avoid mixed content.

Monitor the Core Web Vitals in the following weeks. Some poorly configured SSL certificates or incomplete certificate chains can slow down the TLS handshake, degrading LCP. A WebPageTest before and after migration gives you the baseline.

What to do if backlinks still point to HTTP?

Don’t panic. Well-configured 301 redirects transfer PageRank. Google follows these redirects and consolidates authority on the HTTPS version.

If you have strategic backlinks from sites you control or have relationships with, request a manual update to HTTPS. But don’t waste time contacting 500 small blogs: the redirects do the job.

For major sites (Wikipedia, national press, official directories), a courteous email can speed up the update. But make sure to emphasize internal signal consistency: links, sitemaps, structured data.

  • Obtain a valid SSL certificate covering all necessary subdomains
  • Configure permanent 301 redirects from each HTTP URL to its exact HTTPS counterpart
  • Update all internal links, canonical tags, and XML sitemaps to HTTPS
  • Add the HTTPS property in Search Console and submit the sitemap in secured version
  • Check for the absence of mixed content (HTTP resources loaded on HTTPS pages)
  • Monitor Core Web Vitals and SSL handshake times post-migration
A complete HTTPS migration requires precise technical coordination between the certificate, server redirects, internal links, and Search Console declarations. These optimizations may seem straightforward on paper, but flawless execution demands server expertise, in-depth CMS knowledge, and the ability to anticipate impacts on crawling and indexing. If your internal team lacks the technical skills or availability to manage this type of project, enlisting an SEO agency specialized in technical migrations will ensure a seamless transition without traffic loss and a rigorous follow-up of critical metrics.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Est-ce qu'une redirection 302 de HTTP vers HTTPS suffit pour la migration ?
Non. Les redirections 302 sont temporaires et ne transfèrent pas les signaux de ranking. Google peut ne pas consolider l'autorité sur HTTPS. Utilisez toujours des redirections 301 permanentes.
Dois-je rediriger les pages HTTP en erreur 404 vers leurs équivalents HTTPS ?
Non. Une page 404 en HTTP doit rester 404 en HTTPS ou être supprimée. Rediriger une 404 vers une page active crée de la confusion et dilue la pertinence.
Combien de temps Google met-il pour consolider l'indexation après migration HTTPS ?
Entre quelques jours et plusieurs semaines selon la taille du site et la fréquence de crawl. Un sitemap HTTPS bien soumis et des redirections 301 propres accélèrent le processus.
Les backlinks HTTP perdent-ils de leur valeur après migration HTTPS ?
Non, si les redirections 301 sont en place. Google suit ces redirections et transfère le PageRank. La valeur reste intacte, seul l'URL final change.
Faut-il bloquer le protocole HTTP dans le robots.txt après migration ?
Non, surtout pas. Les redirections 301 doivent être suivies par Googlebot. Bloquer HTTP empêche le bot de découvrir les redirections et ralentit la consolidation de l'indexation.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Crawl & Indexing HTTPS & Security

🎥 From the same video 13

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 56 min · published on 15/05/2018

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.