Official statement
Other statements from this video 1 ▾
Google confirms that changing the URL structure requires redirects to the new addresses, or you risk losing organic traffic. The reindexing process takes time, which means planning these migrations during off-peak periods. The main issue remains long-term stability: choose URLs now that won't require future modifications.
What you need to understand
Why does Google emphasize redirects so much when changing URLs?
When you modify your URL structure, Google instantly loses the historical signals associated with each address. Authority built up, backlinks, user signals: everything is tied to the original URL.
Without redirects, you force Google to treat the new URLs as entirely new pages, which can collapse your rankings for several weeks or even months. 301 redirects pass most of the ranking signals from the old to the new URL, allowing for a gradual transition rather than a sudden break.
How long does this reindexing phase really last?
Mueller remains intentionally vague on timelines. The reindexing time varies depending on the crawl budget allocated to your site, its size, and the quality of your redirects.
For a 500-page site with a good crawl budget, expect 2-4 weeks for partial stabilization. For a site with thousands of pages and deep URLs, this timeframe can easily exceed 3 months. The concept of “time” remains deliberately vague in this statement.
What does it truly mean to “choose stable URLs for the long term”?
Google suggests thinking architecturally before migrating. A stable URL is a structure that will survive multiple redesigns, CMS changes, or product catalog evolutions.
Concrete example: prefer /category/product/ instead of /2023/category/product/ which will require migration every year. Also avoid technical CMS identifiers (/node/12345) that reveal the underlying technology and become obsolete during a platform change.
- 301 redirects are mandatory to pass ranking signals when changing URLs
- Reindexing takes time, it's impossible to predict a precise timeframe according to Google
- Planning the migration during off-peak periods limits the impact on revenue
- Favor URLs decoupled from technology and temporality to avoid future migrations
- Each additional migration dilutes signals, hence the importance of getting it right the first time
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes, but it minimizes certain risks. 301 redirects indeed pass most of the PageRank and ranking signals, but not 100%. Each redirect hop introduces a micro-loss of SEO “juice”.
On poorly prepared migrations, we regularly see traffic drops of 20-40% over several months, even with redirects in place. The issue? Google must recrawl, reindex, recalculate signals, and the algorithm tests the new URLs before restoring their original positions. [To verify]: Google never communicates the exact percentage of signals passed by a 301.
What nuances should be added to this generic advice?
Mueller does not specify that some migrations require different strategies depending on the context. Migrating 50 pages has nothing to do with migrating 50,000 URLs.
On large sites, it is important to prioritize redirects: start with the URLs generating traffic, pages with quality backlinks, and evergreen content. Systematically redirecting every dead URL from 5 years ago to a generic homepage can even dilute signals and create soft 404s depending on the context.
Another point missing: the difference between redirecting to an equivalent page and redirecting to a “similar” page. Google is less tolerant of approximate redirects. If you remove a product category, redirecting to the homepage often leads to a ranking loss.
When does this rule not apply?
If you are launching an entirely new site with a radically different positioning, keeping the old URLs via redirects can confuse thematic signals. Sometimes it’s better to start fresh on a new domain.
Another exception: sites with severe manual or algorithmic penalties. Migrating to new URLs without redirects may allow you to start over on healthy foundations, even if it means rebuilding authority from scratch. It’s a risky bet, but sometimes the only viable option.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you concretely do before migrating your URLs?
Conduct a thorough audit of the existing setup as a starting point. List all indexed URLs via Google Search Console, Screaming Frog, or your preferred crawling tool. Identify those that generate organic traffic, conversions, or have quality backlinks.
Then, map each old URL to its new destination in a 1:1 manner as much as possible. No bulk redirects to the homepage or a generic category unless no relevant alternative exists. Document this mapping in a spreadsheet or a configuration file to facilitate server-side implementation.
What mistakes should you absolutely avoid during a URL migration?
The first classic mistake: implementing redirects after launching the new site. Result: Google crawls the new URLs, finds 404s everywhere, and starts deindexing. Configure redirects before switching the DNS or making the new site accessible.
The second common pitfall: redirect chains. If you’ve already migrated once, ensure that the old redirects point directly to the new final URLs, not to an intermediate URL that redirects itself. Googlebot follows a maximum of 5 hops, but each hop slows down crawling and dilutes signals.
The third mistake: neglecting URLs with parameters. If your old site used tracking or filtering parameters (?color=red), make sure these variations are either properly redirected or correctly canonicalized to avoid residual duplicate content.
How can you check that the migration is going smoothly once it’s launched?
Monitor Google Search Console daily during the first 2-3 weeks. Coverage tab: track 404s, soft 404s, server errors. Performance tab: compare traffic week by week to detect unusual drops.
Use a crawling tool to simulate Googlebot and check that all redirects return a 301 code, not 302 (temporary) or 307. Also verify that the new URLs are indeed indexable: absent noindex tags, robots.txt allowing crawling, self-referencing canonicals.
Finally, keep an eye on your external backlinks. If third-party sites point to your old URLs, contact them to update the links when possible. The fewer redirects Google has to follow externally, the quicker your new URLs will regain their authority.
- Map each old URL to its final destination before launching
- Implement permanent 301 redirects, never 302 or 307
- Avoid redirect chains by pointing directly to the new destination
- Monitor Google Search Console daily for the first 3 weeks post-migration
- Crawl the site after migration to detect configuration errors
- Plan the migration during a low traffic period to limit commercial impact
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de temps faut-il maintenir les redirections 301 après une migration ?
Les redirections 301 transmettent-elles 100% du PageRank ?
Peut-on migrer progressivement les URLs par sections plutôt que tout d'un coup ?
Que faire si on a déjà migré sans redirections et perdu du trafic ?
Faut-il rediriger les URLs qui généraient peu ou pas de trafic ?
🎥 From the same video 1
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1 min · published on 28/03/2018
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.