Official statement
Other statements from this video 11 ▾
- 1:47 Faut-il vraiment supprimer la directive meta 'follow' de vos pages ?
- 4:02 Faut-il vraiment rediriger les fiches produits indisponibles ou suffit-il d'afficher un message d'erreur ?
- 7:30 Faut-il bannir les redirections IP pour le SEO international ?
- 10:31 Les titres polémiques peuvent-ils nuire au référencement de votre site ?
- 17:39 Les redirections JavaScript sont-elles vraiment traitées comme des redirections classiques par Google ?
- 21:05 Les changements SEO peuvent-ils garantir une hausse de trafic mesurable ?
- 25:19 Faut-il vraiment implémenter hreflang sur toutes les pages traduites de votre site ?
- 43:56 Le contenu thématique suffit-il vraiment à éviter les classements parasites en SEO ?
- 51:48 Le Safe Search filtre-t-il vraiment les sites sans pénaliser leur classement global ?
- 54:16 L'indexation mobile-first fonctionne-t-elle sans site responsive ?
- 55:45 Combien de temps Google met-il vraiment à réévaluer vos signaux de marque après une fusion ?
Google claims that redirects can be processed within a few days if all SEO signals are aligned — a claim that critically depends on the frequency at which pages are recrawled. In practical terms, this means that a redirect on a page crawled daily will be processed quickly, while a URL ignored by Googlebot will wait for weeks. The real challenge remains to maintain an optimal crawl budget and prevent your redirects from falling into the depths of indexing.
What you need to understand
What does "a few days" really mean for Google?
Mueller's wording remains intentionally vague. A few days can mean three as much as ten — no one gets a clear SLA. What matters is the notion of aligned SEO signals: here, Google speaks about the consistency between redirects, internal links, sitemaps, and crawl history.
If a URL received frequent visits from Googlebot before the redirect, the bot will naturally come back and detect the change quickly. On the other hand, if the source URL was marginal, rarely crawled, the redirect will remain invisible until the next visit — which may take time.
How does crawl frequency impact this timeline?
This is the crux of the matter. A page crawled daily will see its redirect taken into account within 24-72 hours — it's based on experience. But a deep page, without backlinks, without traffic, can remain for weeks without a visit from Googlebot. The redirect technically exists, but Google ignores it due to lack of visits.
Mueller doesn't say it explicitly, but he implies that you need to force Google's hand: submit the old URL via Search Console, create internal links to the new one, update the sitemap. Without active intervention, the timeline becomes random.
What are the "SEO signals" that need to be aligned?
Google doesn't provide an exhaustive list, but we can infer: consistency of redirects (no chains 301 > 302 > 301), updating the internal linking (links point to the new URL), up-to-date sitemap, and absence of conflicts (no canonicals pointing to the old URL).
One signal that often trips up: external backlinks. If 500 domains point to the old URL and you redirect without updating those links, Google sees a gap. It will take the redirect into account, but the PageRank transfer will be diluted. And that's something that isn't talked about enough.
- Crawl frequency: determines how quickly Googlebot detects the redirect
- Consistency of signals: internal linking, sitemaps, canonicals must point to the new URL
- Type of redirect: a permanent 301 is still the standard for SEO migrations
- Proactivity: submitting URLs via Search Console speeds up the process
- Backlinks: the quality and updating of incoming links influence the PageRank transfer
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes and no. On high crawl budget sites — e-commerce, media, established SaaS — we indeed observe processing within 3-5 days. But on more modest sites, or marginal URLs, the timeline can easily stretch to 2-3 weeks. [To be verified]: Mueller doesn't quantify what a "good" crawl frequency is.
The problem is that Google provides no quantified threshold. Is a site crawled every two days considered "frequent"? Hard to say. In practice, sites that achieve the best performance are crawled several times a day on their strategic pages.
What nuances should be added to this statement?
The first nuance: the redirect is detected, but the transfer of PageRank and rankings takes longer. Google may know in three days that URL A redirects to B, but it might keep the old URL in the index for two weeks while it "verifies" that the redirect is stable.
The second nuance: redirect chains complicate matters. If A > B > C, Google can take weeks to sort it all out, even with daily crawling. And if you switch from a 302 to a 301 afterward, the count restarts. Consistency from the outset is non-negotiable.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
The first case: penalized or monitored sites. If your site has a history of spam, duplicate content, or abusive redirects, Google intentionally slows down the crawl. You can align all signals, and the timeline will remain uncompressible.
The second case: mass migrations. When you're migrating 10,000 URLs at once, Google has neither the resources nor the desire to crawl everything in 48 hours. It prioritizes historically important pages, and the rest follows over time — sometimes spanning several months. That's why we always recommend monitoring indexation post-migration for a minimum of 90 days.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do concretely before implementing redirects?
Audit the current crawl frequency of the URLs you plan to redirect. Search Console > Crawl Stats gives you a monthly view, but that’s insufficient. Use server logs to identify pages crawled daily versus those ignored for weeks.
Next, clean up the internal linking. If you're redirecting a page that receives 200 internal links, update these links before deploying the redirect. It may seem basic, but it’s rarely done — and it wastes crawl budget unnecessarily.
How can you accelerate the processing of redirects after deployment?
First action: submit the old URLs via Search Console. This forces priority recrawl. Second action: update the XML sitemap to list only the new URLs, and submit this sitemap immediately. Google hates crawling sitemaps that point to 301s.
Third often-neglected lever: create temporary internal links to the new URLs from high-crawl pages. Homepage, main categories, recent articles — anything crawled daily. These links act as a "bridge" to accelerate discovery and PageRank transfer.
What critical mistakes should be avoided in managing redirects?
Critical mistake number one: redirect chains. A > B > C is a disaster for crawl budget and dilutes PageRank. Googlebot follows up to five hops, but each hop slows down the process and loses value. Always aim for a direct redirect.
Critical mistake number two: leaving canonicals pointing to the old URL after a redirect. This creates a signal conflict — Google doesn't know which version to index. The same goes for hreflang tags on multilingual sites: they must be updated simultaneously with the redirect.
- Audit the crawl frequency of relevant URLs before redirecting
- Update the internal linking to point directly to the new URLs
- Submit the old URLs via Search Console to force a recrawl
- Clean up the XML sitemap to list only the final URLs, without redirects
- Avoid redirect chains — always redirect directly to the final destination
- Monitor indexation for 90 days post-migration via logs and Search Console
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Une redirection 302 temporaire ralentit-elle la prise en compte par rapport à une 301 ?
Dois-je conserver les anciennes URLs en redirection indéfiniment ?
Puis-je rediriger plusieurs anciennes URLs vers une seule nouvelle page ?
Comment savoir si ma redirection a bien transféré le PageRank ?
Les redirections JavaScript sont-elles prises en compte aussi rapidement que les 301 serveur ?
🎥 From the same video 11
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 56 min · published on 22/01/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.