Official statement
Other statements from this video 8 ▾
- 4:40 Faut-il vraiment traiter les actions manuelles qui ne visent que quelques URLs isolées ?
- 20:14 Pourquoi la Search Console affiche-t-elle un noindex absent du code source ?
- 21:55 L'indexation mobile-first impacte-t-elle vraiment vos positions dans Google ?
- 25:36 Faut-il vraiment supprimer le balisage d'avis si votre page n'affiche aucune note ?
- 28:57 Domaine ou sous-domaine : Google a-t-il vraiment tranché pour le SEO ?
- 37:43 Hreflang pour contenu identique multilingue : stratégie efficace ou dilution d'autorité ?
- 40:18 Le ciblage géographique Search Console améliore-t-il vraiment le ranking local sans pénaliser l'international ?
- 51:54 Le sitemap Google News est-il vraiment la méthode la plus rapide pour indexer du contenu frais ?
Google confirms that rel=next/prev tags are not sufficient to understand the pagination structure. Standard HTML links between paginated pages are still essential for crawling and indexing. This statement serves as a reminder that rel attributes remain a weak signal compared to actual internal linking.
What you need to understand
What does the distinction between rel=next/prev and HTML links really mean?
The nuance is crucial. The rel=next and rel=prev tags are attributes placed in the <head> of a page to indicate to Google the pagination sequence. The issue is that these tags represent a passive signal that the engine may ignore if it has not first crawled the relevant pages.
Standard HTML links (clickable <a href> tags in the body of the page) allow Googlebot to actively discover the next and previous pages. Without these links, even if the rel tags are present, the crawler may never reach certain paginated pages.
Why does Google emphasize HTML links in addition to rel?
Crawl budget is a reality, particularly for large sites. If your pagination relies solely on JavaScript or on rel tags without actual hyperlinks, Googlebot may overlook dozens of product or listing pages.
John Mueller highlights that traditional HTML structure offers a redundancy of signals: links allow discovery and navigation, while rel tags clarify the logical relationship. Combining both ensures better understanding by the engine.
Does this recommendation apply to all types of pagination?
Technically yes, but real-world scenarios show nuances. For a classic pagination typical of blogs or e-commerce with dozens of pages, HTML links are typically sufficient. The rel=next/prev adds a marginal additional signal.
In contrast, for massive catalogs with hundreds or thousands of paginated pages, the absence of HTML links can become critical. Some CMS generate infinite pagination via AJAX without actual hyperlinks: this is where crawling fails, regardless of the rel tags.
- Rel=next/prev tags never replace standard HTML links for page discovery.
- A solid internal linking structure between paginated pages ensures comprehensive crawling.
- JavaScript and infinite pagination are problematic if no HTML link is rendered server-side or in SSR.
- The rel tags are a complementary signal, not a substitute for internal linking.
- Google can ignore rel if it deems the pagination poorly structured or if the crawl budget is exhausted before reaching the relevant pages.
SEO Expert opinion
Does this statement reflect recent real-world observations?
In practice, yes. Tests show that Google crawls and indexes paginated pages more quickly when they have standard HTML links, regardless of whether rel tags are present. The rel=next/prev provides marginal improvement in the understanding of the logical sequence, but does not trigger automatic crawling.
Several audits of e-commerce sites reveal that paginated pages without actual hyperlinks often remain orphaned, even with correctly implemented rel=next/prev. The rel signal is passive and optional for Googlebot, unlike HTML links which enforce discovery.
What common mistakes are observed with pagination?
The most common error is JavaScript pagination without HTML fallback. Many modern frameworks (React, Vue, Angular) generate "Next" buttons that load content via fetch/axios, without creating a crawlable hyperlink. The result: only page 1 gets indexed.
Another classic mistake is rel=canonical pointing to page 1 from all paginated pages. This practice, once recommended, now harms the indexing of pages 2, 3, and so on. Google has clarified several times that each paginated page should have its own canonical tag, or better, use a "View All" URL as canonical if relevant. [To be verified]: Google has never provided specific figures on the SEO impact of rel=next/prev versus their total absence, while maintaining that they remain useful.
In what cases can we completely do without rel=next/prev?
If your pagination is simple and well-linked (Previous/Next links + clickable page numbers), the rel tags provide little measurable value. A/B tests have never shown significant gains in ranking or indexing solely from adding these tags.
However, for complex architectures (pagination + filters + sorting), rel=next/prev can help Google distinguish between classic pagination and navigation facets. But again, no official Google data quantifies this benefit.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you prioritize checking on your site?
Start by audiing the internal linking of your paginated pages. Use Screaming Frog or a similar tool to ensure that each pagination page contains standard HTML links to the next and previous pages. If these links are generated in JavaScript, verify that they are present in the source HTML (view-source) or rendered in SSR.
Also test with Google Search Console: request inspection of a deep paginated page (page 5, 10) and check if Googlebot discovers and indexes it. If it remains orphaned despite rel=next/prev, the issue lies with the linking.
How can you fix problematic JavaScript pagination?
Two approaches: either switch to server-side rendering (SSR) that generates HTML links from the initial HTML, or implement a progressive enhancement with actual hyperlinks that JavaScript adds later. The idea is to ensure that the raw HTML contains functional <a href> tags.
For sites using React, Next.js offers native SSR. For Vue, Nuxt.js does the job. If you remain in pure CSR, consider at least a static pre-rendering of the pagination URLs via a build-time plugin.
Are rel=next/prev tags still useful to implement?
Since March 2019, Google has confirmed that it no longer uses them. They do not harm but also no longer provide any measurable SEO benefit. Focus your efforts on HTML links and on a clean, consistent URL structure for pagination.
If your CMS generates them automatically, there is no need to remove them. But don’t waste time adding them manually: they are no longer a ranking or crawling factor.
- Ensure that each paginated page contains clickable HTML links to the next and previous pages
- Audit with Screaming Frog to detect orphaned paginated pages
- Test the raw HTML output (view-source) to confirm the presence of hyperlinks, not just in the JavaScript DOM
- Remove rel=canonical pointing to page 1 from all paginated pages (each page should have its own canonical)
- Implement SSR or pre-rendering if pagination is managed in pure JavaScript
- Monitor in Search Console the indexing of deep paginated pages
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Les balises rel=next/prev ont-elles encore un impact SEO ?
Peut-on utiliser uniquement JavaScript pour gérer la pagination sans liens HTML ?
Faut-il mettre un rel=canonical vers la page 1 depuis toutes les pages paginées ?
Comment vérifier que mes pages paginées sont bien crawlées par Google ?
Les frameworks JavaScript comme React posent-ils problème pour la pagination ?
🎥 From the same video 8
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 53 min · published on 11/12/2018
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.