Official statement
Other statements from this video 9 ▾
- 3:14 Les balises H1 sont-elles vraiment inutiles pour le référencement ?
- 5:20 Une migration de site peut-elle vraiment se faire sans perte de ranking ?
- 6:24 AMP ou PWA : quelle technologie choisir pour maximiser vos performances SEO ?
- 9:11 L'indexation mobile-first efface-t-elle vraiment le contenu desktop de Google ?
- 13:16 Faut-il vraiment rediriger selon l'appareil entre mobile et desktop ?
- 15:23 Les pages 404 peuvent-elles vraiment polluer votre index Google ?
- 16:25 Faut-il privilégier un sous-domaine ou un sous-répertoire pour le SEO ?
- 33:06 Les contenus générés par IA peuvent-ils vraiment être pénalisés par Google ?
- 36:14 Hreflang vs canonical : qui l'emporte vraiment dans les résultats de recherche ?
Google clearly states that it does not use third-party metrics like Domain Authority in its ranking algorithms. These scores are constructs from external tools attempting to model Google's behavior, but they don't fully succeed. However, this doesn't mean they should be ignored: they remain approximate indicators of certain dynamics that Google does value.
What you need to understand
Why Does Google Explicitly Reject DA?
John Mueller's statement doesn't come out of nowhere. Metrics like Domain Authority are developed by third-party companies (Moz for DA, Ahrefs for DR, Semrush for Authority Score) that attempt to model how Google evaluates a site's authority.
The problem? Google never shares its algorithm formula. Therefore, these tools rely on their own crawls, their own indexes, and their own calculations. The result: a DA of 60 at Moz means absolutely nothing to Google, which uses its own internal metrics — including PageRank, although it's no longer publicly visible.
Are These Metrics Useless Then?
No, and this is where many get it wrong. DA is not a ranking factor, but it often correlates with signals that Google genuinely values: backlink volume, diversity of referring domains, editorial quality of the sites citing you.
Using DA as a proxy to quickly assess the strength of a competing site or a link-building prospect remains relevant. What becomes problematic is fetishizing this score to the point of paying more for a link on a site with DA 50 than for a link on a site with DA 30 that is perfectly thematic and engaging.
What Consistent Position Should Be Taken Towards These Tools?
Consider third-party metrics as practical approximations, not absolute truths. They help you sort, prioritize, and benchmark — but should never replace a manual analysis of real signals.
A site with a low DA but massive organic traffic, high engagement rates, and solid media coverage is often worth more than a DA 70 site with no traffic or usage signals. Google Measures Authority Differently, and that's the authority that truly matters.
- Google does not use any third-party metrics (DA, DR, AS, TF/CF) in its ranking algorithms
- These scores remain useful as quick comparative indicators, but never as sole decision-making criteria
- A site's real authority is measured via signals that Google directly observes: link profile, usage signals, relevance, freshness
- Paying a premium for a high DA without checking thematic relevance or actual traffic is a common strategic mistake
- SEO tools relying on these metrics (audits, scoring) should be used as decision aids, not oracles
SEO Expert opinion
Does This Statement Contradict What We Observe in the Field?
Not really. What Mueller is saying here is that Google does not consult Moz's API to determine if your site deserves to be on the first page. It's obvious, but many clients and even some beginner practitioners forget this.
What’s more subtle is that third-party metrics attempt to replicate signals that Google actually values. A site with a high DA often has a strong backlink profile, longevity, and a diversity of referring domains — all signals that Google measures in its own way. The correlation exists, but it is not causal.
What Nuances Should Be Added to This Official Position?
Google may repeat that these metrics don't matter, they practically structure the entire link-building market. The pricing of sponsored links, advertisers' choices, agency dashboards — everything relies on these scores.
This creates a gap between theory ("DA doesn't matter") and the economic reality of SEO ("a DA 60 link costs €300, a DA 30 link costs €80"). [To be verified]: no recent study formally proves that improving DA correlates with improved Google rankings — only correlations observed on large samples, which can be explained otherwise.
Another nuance: Google does indeed use its own internal authority calculation, derived from the historical PageRank. This calculation remains secret, but it exists. Saying "authority doesn't matter" would be false; saying "your Moz DA doesn't matter" is accurate.
In What Cases Could This Rule Be Misleading?
If you suddenly decide to ignore all third-party metrics, you lose a quick sorting tool. Manually analyzing 200 sites for a link-building campaign without any prior filters is time-consuming and ineffective.
The reverse mistake — blindly relying on DA — is even more dangerous. I've seen sites invest thousands of euros in DA 50+ backlinks from recycled content farms, with zero impact on rankings. DA can be artificially inflated through PBNs or spam, without reflecting true authority in Google's eyes.
Practical impact and recommendations
What Should You Actually Do to Assess a Site's Authority?
Start by cross-referencing multiple sources. A site with a Moz DA of 45, an Ahrefs DR of 50, and a Semrush Authority Score of 48 likely has consistency in its link profile. If a site shows a DA of 60 but DR of 15, dig deeper: there may be manipulation or desynchronized data.
Next, look at the real usage signals: estimated traffic (Similarweb, Semrush), presence in Google News, mentions in reputable media, social engagement if relevant to the niche. A site invisible in the SERPs despite a high DA is suspicious.
What Mistakes Should Be Avoided When Analyzing These Metrics?
Never purchase a link solely because the DA exceeds an arbitrary threshold. Thematic relevance always takes precedence over the overall score. A link from a DA 25 food blog is worth more for a food e-commerce than a link from a DA 55 tech site.
Avoid comparing DAs across different niches. A health site can reach a DA of 70 with 200 quality backlinks; a tech site may top out at DA 40 with 2000 backlinks if the competition is fiercer. Sector context changes everything.
How Can You Check That Your Link-Building Strategy Remains Aligned with What Google Values?
Regularly analyze the correlation between your link acquisitions and your ranking movements. If you obtain 10 DA 50+ backlinks without any improvement on your target queries after 6-8 weeks, either the actual quality of these links is low, or you aimed for the wrong anchors or pages.
Use Google Search Console to observe which referring domains are actually generating impressions and indirect clicks. A good backlink doesn't just pass on SEO juice: it should also bring qualified traffic.
- Always cross-reference DA, DR, and Authority Score before making any link purchase decision
- Verify the estimated organic traffic of the source site (Semrush, Ahrefs, Similarweb)
- Manually analyze the thematic relevance and editorial quality of the target page
- Check the domain's history (Wayback Machine) to detect any past acquisitions or content pivots
- Measure the actual impact of each link-building campaign via Search Console and your rankings on target queries
- Gradually abandon purely quantitative KPIs ("getting 50 DA 40+ backlinks") in favor of qualitative KPIs ("obtaining 15 thematic backlinks from sites with organic traffic > 10k/month")
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Google utilise-t-il le Domain Authority de Moz pour classer les sites ?
Dois-je complètement ignorer le DA dans ma stratégie SEO ?
Pourquoi certains sites avec un DA élevé ne rankent-ils pas bien ?
Quelle métrique tierce est la plus fiable pour évaluer l'autorité d'un site ?
Un lien depuis un site DA 60 vaut-il toujours mieux qu'un lien DA 30 ?
🎥 From the same video 9
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h03 · published on 06/09/2019
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.