Official statement
Other statements from this video 23 ▾
- 0:41 Peut-on copier les descriptions fabricants sans risque SEO ?
- 2:40 Faut-il vraiment supprimer les mots vides de vos URL pour améliorer votre SEO ?
- 4:42 Faut-il vraiment mettre les facettes en noindex ou risque-t-on de perdre des pages stratégiques ?
- 5:46 Faut-il vraiment mettre tous les facettes en noindex ?
- 6:38 Faut-il vraiment dissocier balise title et H1 pour le SEO ?
- 7:58 Faut-il vraiment dupliquer ses mots-clés entre la balise Title et la H1 ?
- 9:37 Pourquoi vos données structurées disparaissent-elles des résultats de recherche ?
- 9:37 Les données structurées marchent-elles vraiment sans qualité de site ?
- 10:45 Les données structurées peuvent-elles être ignorées à cause de la qualité de la page ?
- 15:23 Les redirections 301 perdent-elles encore du PageRank en SEO ?
- 15:26 Les redirections 301 tuent-elles vraiment votre PageRank ?
- 15:32 Faut-il migrer son site vers HTTPS en une seule fois ou par étapes ?
- 19:02 Changer l'URL ou le design d'une page tue-t-il son classement ?
- 19:08 Pourquoi les refontes de site provoquent-elles toujours des chutes de classement ?
- 21:29 Les pages d'entrée géolocalisées peuvent-elles vraiment ruiner vos classements ?
- 23:33 Google+ booste-t-il vraiment votre SEO ou est-ce un mythe total ?
- 26:24 Penguin 4 en temps réel ralentit-il vraiment l'indexation des nouveaux liens ?
- 28:00 Les snippets en vedette impactent-ils négativement votre SEO ?
- 40:16 Le jargon local booste-t-il vraiment votre référencement régional ?
- 56:11 Faut-il vraiment bloquer l'indexation des pages de pagination après la page 2 pour économiser le crawl budget ?
- 61:32 Un ccTLD peut-il vraiment cibler un public mondial sans pénalité SEO ?
- 67:06 Les fluctuations d'indexation sont-elles toujours anodines ou cachent-elles des problèmes critiques ?
- 69:19 Faut-il vraiment configurer les paramètres URL dans Search Console pour contrôler l'indexation ?
John Mueller states that stop words (in, at, how, to, etc.) in URLs do not penalize SEO. While they can make the address longer and harder to type manually, the impact on ranking is negligible. In practice, prioritize human readability over the obsession with the perfect shortened URL.
What you need to understand
What are stop words and why is this question raised?
Stop words refer to those small grammatical terms we use every day: articles (the, a), prepositions (in, of, for), conjunctions (and, or), pronouns. In English: in, at, to, from, how, the, a, an. For years, the SEO dogma insisted on removing them from URLs to shorten the address and focus the "juice" on the main keywords.
This obsession came from a time when Google treated URLs differently. Algorithms analyzed every term in the address as a signal of relevance. Removing stop words theoretically maximized the keyword density in the URL. However, that view is outdated thanks to Panda and Hummingbird.
What does Google really say about dealing with stop words?
Mueller confirms: no SEO problems with keeping these terms. Google now understands natural language and semantic context. The algorithm knows that a URL containing "how-to-optimize-images" and "optimize-images" points to the same thematic content.
What's the important nuance? A longer URL makes manual entry difficult. But let’s be honest: who still types out complete URLs in 2025? Users click, copy-paste, or search. Social sharing and memorability are the only cases where length really matters.
Why do some SEOs continue to remove these words?
It’s mostly habit. Old reflexes persist even when the technical foundations have changed. Some SEO audit tools still flag stop words as "optimization opportunities," fueling this outdated practice.
There is also a legitimate URL cleanliness argument: /services/seo-paris/ is more compact than /our-natural-seo-services-in-paris/. However, this preference relates to UX and architecture, not algorithmic ranking. Google does not penalize or favor either version.
- Stop words do not impact ranking according to Mueller
- The length of the URL only poses a problem for manual entry and memorability
- Google analyzes the overall semantic context, not raw keyword density
- Prioritize consistency: if your URLs include stop words, maintain that structure throughout
- The real impact lies in user experience, not the algorithm
SEO Expert opinion
Does this statement align with field observations?
Yes, in general. A/B tests conducted on thousands of URLs show that adding or removing stop words does not significantly change positions. E-commerce sites with natural URLs like /how-to-choose-running-shoes/ perform just as well as those using /choose-running-shoes/.
However, Mueller overlooks a crucial point: the overall length of the URL. An address exceeding 100-120 characters poses display problems in SERPs, sharing on some platforms, and indexing in edge cases. It’s not the stop words that are problematic, but the excessive accumulation of terms.
What nuances should be considered with this recommendation?
Mueller's statement lacks context regarding non-English languages. In French, URLs with articles and prepositions quickly become cumbersome: /the-best-techniques-for-improving-your-site-seo/. Here, a smart compromise is to maintain semantic readability without fully replicating grammar.
Another point is hierarchical structure. A URL like /blog/in/category/post/ with structural stop words (in, at, under) poses no technical problem, but creates a confusing hierarchy. Stop words in the final slug are harmless; in the folder structure, they can obscure the site’s logical architecture. [To verify]: no public study from Google quantifies the impact of stop words in subdirectories versus the final slug.
In what cases does this rule become secondary?
When you’re redesigning an established site with thousands of indexed URLs. Changing /how-to-bake-bread/ to /bake-bread/ requires 301 redirects. The technical cost and the risk of losing crawl budget far outweigh the negligible promised benefit. Unless it’s a complete redesign, do not alter existing URLs for this reason.
For new content, ask yourself the real question: will this URL be shared verbally, printed, or typed manually? A podcast, printed material, or a physical event? In this case, conciseness matters. Otherwise, prioritize immediate clarity for the user who is scanning the address in their browser.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you actually do with your current URLs?
Do not change anything if your URLs already include stop words and the site performs well. Any URL modification costs crawl budget and risks redirection errors. Focus your energy on optimizations that genuinely move the needle: content, internal linking, Core Web Vitals.
For new content, establish a clear convention within your team. Either you keep stop words to maximize readability (recommended approach for blogs, media, editorial sites), or you adopt a super-compact structure (e-commerce with thousands of product pages). The key? Consistency across the entire domain.
What mistakes should you avoid when creating URLs?
First mistake: removing stop words to the point of making the URL unintelligible. /web-optimization-images-performance-2024/ loses clarity compared to /how-to-optimize-images-for-web/. The user who sees the URL in a search result must instantly understand the subject.
Second trap: mixing approaches. Having some sections of the site with stop words, and others without creates a perceived architectural inconsistency that experienced users view negatively. Google does not care, but your visitors notice this lack of rigor.
How can you check if your URL strategy is working?
Analyze your organic click-through rates in Search Console. A clear and reassuring URL improves CTR on certain informational queries. Compare the performance of your long versus short URLs at equivalent positions.
Also check how they display in the SERPs: truncated URLs with […] give an impression of lack of professionalism. If 30% of your important pages suffer from this truncation, it’s a warning signal about the overall length, regardless of stop words.
- Audit your current URLs: identify those exceeding 80 characters and check their SERP display
- Define a team convention: with or without stop_words, but applied uniformly
- Never modify an existing well-positioned URL just to remove stop words
- Test readability: show the URL to someone without context; they should understand the subject in 2 seconds
- Document your choice in an editorial guide to maintain long-term consistency
- Monitor organic CTR metrics to detect potential perception issues
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Dois-je supprimer les mots vides de mes URL existantes pour améliorer mon SEO ?
Les URL courtes sans mots vides se classent-elles mieux que les URL longues ?
Quelle est la longueur maximale recommandée pour une URL ?
Les mots vides dans les sous-répertoires posent-ils un problème ?
Comment Google traite-t-il les mots vides dans l'analyse sémantique des URL ?
🎥 From the same video 23
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h14 · published on 22/09/2017
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.