Official statement
Other statements from this video 24 ▾
- 2:38 Le HTTPS est-il vraiment un facteur de classement décisif pour votre SEO ?
- 3:14 HTTPS est-il vraiment un facteur de classement qui change la donne ?
- 6:06 Les redirections 301 font-elles vraiment chuter votre trafic organique ?
- 7:05 Passer de HTTP à HTTPS fait-il vraiment chuter votre trafic organique ?
- 8:27 Les liens morts pénalisent-ils vraiment votre référencement naturel ?
- 8:28 Les liens morts nuisent-ils vraiment au classement de votre site ?
- 10:01 Comment réussir sa migration HTTPS sans perdre son référencement ?
- 11:29 Le mobile-friendly impacte-t-il vraiment le ranking ou n'est-ce qu'une question d'UX ?
- 12:06 Pourquoi votre site fluctue-t-il après chaque mise à jour importante ?
- 14:52 Le placement des annonces mobile impacte-t-il vraiment le référencement naturel ?
- 14:57 La disposition des annonces mobile impacte-t-elle vraiment votre référencement naturel ?
- 16:17 Les recherches de marque influencent-elles vraiment le ranking dans Google ?
- 19:25 Les domaines à correspondance exacte (EMD) boostent-ils vraiment le référencement ?
- 19:59 Les domaines à concordance exacte (EMD) boostent-ils vraiment votre référencement ?
- 26:35 Les recherches de marque améliorent-elles vraiment le classement Google ?
- 28:57 Un contenu minimal peut-il vraiment être considéré comme de qualité par Google ?
- 34:06 Peut-on vraiment utiliser display:none en responsive sans risquer une pénalité ?
- 38:59 Comment Google crawle-t-il et indexe-t-il réellement vos sites multilingues ?
- 42:05 Les URL uniques sont-elles vraiment indispensables pour indexer un site JavaScript ?
- 43:49 Faut-il vraiment supprimer vos backlinks toxiques ou le fichier de désaveu suffit-il ?
- 48:29 Le fichier disavow est-il encore utile pour neutraliser les backlinks toxiques ?
- 53:19 Le fichier de désaveu est-il vraiment traité instantanément par Google ?
- 56:58 Les sliders tuent-ils votre visibilité SEO ?
- 65:43 Les sliders de page d'accueil nuisent-ils vraiment au référencement ?
Google confirms that HTTPS is a ranking factor, but its weight remains low in the algorithm. This signal only comes into play when comparing two sites of almost equal relevance. For sensitive sites (e-commerce, finance), migrating is a priority for user trust, but for others, the urgency is relative.
What you need to understand
What is the real weight of HTTPS in the algorithm?
Mueller emphasizes that the impact on rankings is marginal. HTTPS will not elevate an average site to the first page. Google uses it as a secondary tiebreaker when two pieces of content are nearly identical in relevance.
Specifically, if your direct competitor offers the same level of editorial quality, the same link profile, and comparable UX signals, HTTPS may tip the scales. However, this scenario is rare: in most cases, other factors (content, backlinks, user behavior) overshadow this signal.
Why does Google insist on this migration if the impact is low?
Google's communication blends two aspects: user security and SEO. HTTPS protects data in transit, prevents man-in-the-middle attacks, and reassures visitors with the green padlock. Chrome now displays an explicit warning on HTTP pages, which can severely damage your conversion rate.
The SEO issue is thus indirect. A HTTP site suffers an increased bounce rate because users flee from the security warning. This negative behavior sends degraded signals to Google, which may then lower the site's ranking. A vicious cycle begins.
How should we interpret the idea of 'long term' mentioned by Mueller?
Google never sets a harsh deadline, but the pressure gradually increases. Browsers are tightening their warnings, internet users are becoming more aware, and the HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 protocols require HTTPS to function.
“Long term” means that your HTTP site will not disappear tomorrow, but its competitiveness erodes each quarter. New competitors launch directly in HTTPS, which automatically puts you in a defensive position.
- HTTPS is a weak ranking signal that only comes into play when comparing equivalent sites
- The indirect impact (bounce rate, trust, HTTP/2 compatibility) often weighs more heavily than the direct signal
- Chrome and Firefox display warnings on HTTP, which degrades the user experience and thus behavioral metrics
- The migration remains a priority for e-commerce, finance, health, where user trust determines conversion
- For informational sites without sensitive data, the urgency is relative but the trend is inevitable
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with on-the-ground observations?
Yes, and it is rare for Google to be so transparent about the weight of a factor. Large-scale tests confirm that HTTPS alone does not trigger any spectacular jump. I have migrated hundreds of sites: the immediate positive effect is almost zero, sometimes even negative if the migration is poorly handled (bad redirects, mixed content).
However, on ultra-competitive queries where three sites are within 0.2 relevance points, HTTPS can indeed make a difference. But let's be honest; if you are on page 3, migrating to HTTPS will change nothing. First, address your content, links, and technical issues.
What nuances should we add to this official position?
Mueller overlooks a crucial point: the negative impact of remaining on HTTP. The positive signal of HTTPS is weak, certainly, but the negative signal of HTTP grows every year. Chrome now classifies HTTP as “not secure” by default, which drives visitors away before they even see your content.
Second nuance: HTTPS becomes mandatory to leverage HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, protocols that significantly speed up loading. Without HTTPS, you are stuck on HTTP/1.1, which penalizes your Core Web Vitals. The cascading effect is insidious but measurable. [To be verified]: Google has never published precise figures on the speed gain from HTTP/2 alone, but independent benchmarks show an increase of 15 to 40% depending on architectures.
In what cases does this rule not apply or cause issues?
Some old institutional or governmental sites still operate on HTTP because the migration involves a heavy infrastructure overhaul. They retain their rankings because their domain authority outweighs the HTTP handicap. But these are dinosaurs; no site launched after 2018 should consider HTTP.
Another edge case: very low-traffic sites or those nearing the end of life. If you are shutting down a project in six months, investing in an SSL certificate and handling redirects makes no economic sense. Prioritize based on actual ROI, not on principle-based discussions.
Practical impact and recommendations
What practical steps should be taken to migrate to HTTPS?
First, purchase or generate an SSL/TLS certificate. Let's Encrypt offers free and automated certificates, perfect for small sites. For an e-commerce or corporate site, an EV (Extended Validation) certificate boosts trust by displaying the company's name in the address bar.
Next, install the certificate on your server (Apache, Nginx, IIS…) and force all HTTP requests to redirect to HTTPS via a permanent 301. Ensure that each HTTP URL points to its exact HTTPS equivalent, not to the generic homepage. This step often wrecks positions if not executed correctly.
What mistakes should be avoided during and after the migration?
The classic pitfall: mixed content. Your page loads in HTTPS but calls images, scripts, or CSS in HTTP. The browser displays a warning, negating any benefits of the migration. Use a crawler (Screaming Frog, Sitebulb) to track down every residual HTTP resource.
Second common mistake: forgetting to update Google Search Console. Add the new HTTPS property and submit the HTTPS sitemap. Otherwise, Google will continue to prioritize crawling the old HTTP URLs, delaying the recognition of the migration. The same logic applies to canonical tags and hreflang: all must point to HTTPS.
How can I check that my HTTPS site is correctly configured?
Test your SSL configuration with SSL Labs (ssllabs.com/ssltest). Aim for an A or A+ score. A B or C indicates security flaws (obsolete protocols, weak cipher suites) that Google may potentially penalize. Also, make sure HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) is enabled: it forces browsers to always use HTTPS, even if the user types HTTP.
From an SEO perspective, monitor your rankings for 4 to 6 weeks post-migration. A temporary drop of 5-10% is normal while Google recrawls and reassesses. If the drop exceeds 15% or persists beyond two months, investigate: is there an issue with redirects, unresolved mixed content, or loss of external links still pointing to HTTP?
- Purchase/generate a SSL/TLS certificate (free Let's Encrypt or paid EV for e-commerce)
- Set up permanent 301 redirects from each HTTP URL to HTTPS
- Track and fix all mixed content (images, scripts, CSS in HTTP)
- Update Search Console, sitemaps, canonical tags, hreflang to HTTPS
- Enable HSTS to force HTTPS at the browser level
- Check SSL configuration with SSL Labs (aim for score A/A+)
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le passage à HTTPS peut-il faire baisser mon classement temporairement ?
Let's Encrypt est-il suffisant ou faut-il un certificat payant ?
Dois-je conserver les redirections 301 HTTP vers HTTPS indéfiniment ?
HTTPS améliore-t-il vraiment les Core Web Vitals ?
Que faire si mon hébergeur ne propose pas de certificat SSL gratuit ?
🎥 From the same video 24
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h02 · published on 13/01/2015
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.