Official statement
Other statements from this video 30 ▾
- 1:01 Is there really a significant difference between pre-rendering, SSR, and dynamic rendering for SEO?
- 1:02 Pre-rendering, SSR, or dynamic rendering: which strategy should you choose for Googlebot to properly index your JavaScript?
- 2:02 Is pre-rendering really suitable for all types of websites?
- 5:40 Is SSR with hydration really the best of both worlds for SEO?
- 5:40 Does SSR with Hydration Really Solve All JS Crawl Issues?
- 6:42 Are SSR and pre-rendering really SEO techniques or just developer tools?
- 6:42 Is it a myth that JavaScript rendering really helps with SEO?
- 7:12 Is it true that HTML is actually faster to parse than JavaScript for SEO?
- 7:12 Is native HTML really faster than JavaScript for SEO?
- 10:53 Does Google really apply the same ranking rules to all websites?
- 10:53 Why does Google refuse to answer your SEO questions in private?
- 10:53 Does Google really treat all websites equally, regardless of their size or ad budget?
- 10:53 Why does Google refuse to answer your SEO questions privately?
- 13:29 Can private messages to Google really influence the detection of SEO bugs?
- 13:29 Can DMs to Google really trigger fixes?
- 19:57 Does spending more on Google Ads really improve your organic SEO?
- 20:17 Who really decides on exceptions to Google's Honest Results policy?
- 20:17 Can Google really intervene manually on your site for exceptional reasons?
- 21:51 Should you still report spam to Google if reports are never handled individually?
- 22:23 Is it true that reporting spam to Google is almost pointless?
- 22:54 Does Search Console really provide an SEO advantage to its users?
- 23:14 Does Search Console really lack privileged support from Google?
- 24:29 Does escalating a request with Google really impact your SEO?
- 24:29 Should you escalate your SEO issues to Google's management?
- 26:47 Are Office Hours truly the best channel to ask your SEO questions to Google?
- 27:05 Should you really rely on Google’s public channels to solve your SEO issues?
- 28:01 Is it true that Google refuses to give direct SEO answers?
- 29:15 How does Google handle systemic search bugs internally?
- 31:21 Does the Google feedback form in the SERPs really work?
- 31:21 Does the Google feedback form really help correct search results?
Gary Illyes reaffirms that the Google Ads budget or any other Google product does not impact organic ranking at all — the Honest Results policy strictly prohibits it. For an SEO, this means that advertising investment and natural search remain two strictly independent levers. In practical terms? No correlation to expect between AdWords spend and SERP positions, even though some field observations still fuel doubts.
What you need to understand
Why does Google insist so much on this separation?
The Honest Results policy constitutes the ethical foundation of the search engine: any manipulation of organic ranking through paid products would ruin user trust. Google cannot afford to favor a site just because it spends €50k/month on Ads — the SERP would lose all credibility.
This statement is not new. Since the 2010s, Google has repeated this mantra in the face of recurring suspicions. The real question? Not so much the sincerity of the rule but its concrete verification — no external audit exists to prove the absolute impermeability between Ads and Search teams.
Does this rule only cover Google Ads?
No. Gary Illyes explicitly expands beyond Ads: Google Cloud, Workspace, Analytics 360 — any paid Google product is affected. The idea: no budget spent with Google should influence the handling of an SEO question or organic ranking.
In practical terms, this means that a support ticket for SEO via Google Cloud does not receive priority treatment. A big spender in Workspace licenses will not see their penalties lifted faster. The rule is meant to be universal and non-negotiable.
Are the Ads and Search teams really insulated from each other?
On paper, yes. Google maintains a strict organizational separation between the divisions. Search engineers do not have access to the advertising revenue data of a domain — at least, that’s what Google officially claims.
In practice? Impossible to verify from the outside. Internal leaks remain rare, but no transparency mechanism allows SEOs to ensure that this great wall holds. We must take Google at its word — and this is precisely what fuels skepticism.
- Honest Results prohibits any paid influence on organic ranking, whether through Ads, Cloud, or any other Google product.
- No external audit validates this impermeability — transparency relies solely on Google’s public statements.
- The organizational separation between Ads and Search teams exists but remains unverifiable for SEO practitioners.
- The advertising budget should never be used as an argument to expedite an SEO support ticket or lift a manual penalty.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with ground observations?
Officially, yes. Large-scale tests — a sudden halt to Ads budgets across several sites — show no measurable correlation with variations in organic positions. SEOs who have tested confirm: stopping €100k/month in Ads does not drop natural traffic.
Yet, a nuance persists. Some observe that sites with large Ads budgets sometimes benefit from better responsiveness from Google support on technical issues — blocked indexing, misunderstood penalties. Correlation or coincidence? Impossible to settle without internal access. [To be verified]
What cognitive biases distort SEO perceptions?
The main trap: the confusion between correlation and causation. A site that spends heavily on Ads often has good SEO — not because Ads boost ranking, but because a company investing in paid search is also investing in SEO, UX, content, and technical aspects.
Another bias: the confirmation bias. An SEO who suspects Google favors big advertisers will always find isolated examples to validate their belief — while ignoring the hundreds of well-ranked sites that spend nothing on advertising. The brain remembers what confirms, occludes what contradicts.
In what cases might this rule be indirectly circumvented?
Let’s be honest: Ads do not directly impact ranking, but can indirectly influence organic visibility. A site generating traffic via Ads accumulates user signals — click-through rate, engagement, brand awareness. These signals can, in turn, affect SEO.
Concrete example: a massive Ads campaign boosts brand search (branded search). Google detects this user demand signal, and may — indirectly — adjust the site’s relevance for related queries. It’s not Ads that boost SEO, it’s the user behavior generated by Ads that feeds legitimate SEO signals.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do as an SEO in practical terms?
Stop speculating on an SEO advantage via Ads — it doesn’t exist. Treat each channel as an independent lever with its own metrics. If you want to rank, invest in technical aspects, content, UX, backlinks — not in the hope that an Ads budget will elevate your organic positions.
However, leverage legitimate synergies. Ads data — high-performing keywords, conversion rates by landing page, audience insights — are a gold mine for SEO. Use them to prioritize your content optimizations and improve intention/landing match.
What mistakes should you absolutely avoid?
Never negotiate an SEO support ticket by waving your Ads budget. It won’t work — and if a Googler leads you to think otherwise, it’s a misunderstanding or an undocumented exception. The Honest Results rule is non-negotiable publicly.
Another common mistake: abruptly stopping Ads for fear of cannibalizing SEO. The two channels do not cannibalize — they complement each other. A well-positioned site in both SEO and Ads captures more total clicks than a solely organic site. Don’t sacrifice one lever for the sake of a myth.
How to structure your overall Search strategy?
Think full-funnel. Use Ads to capture immediate demand and quickly test keyword hypotheses. Use SEO to build sustainable and profitable traffic over the long term. Both should coexist, not compete.
Some optimizations — UX redesign, technical overhaul, complex content strategy — can prove challenging to orchestrate internally. If your team lacks resources or specialized expertise, hiring an SEO agency can accelerate implementation and ensure personalized guidance on critical projects.
- Maintain a clear separation of budgets and KPIs between Ads and SEO to measure the real performance of each lever.
- Utilize Ads data (keywords, conversions, audiences) to enrich the SEO strategy without confusing correlation and causation.
- Never invoke an advertising budget to expedite an SEO support ticket or lift a manual penalty.
- Test keyword hypotheses via Ads before launching a long-term SEO content project — saving time and reducing risk.
- Regularly analyze branded search queries to detect indirect synergies between Ads campaigns and organic visibility.
- Train internal teams on the complementarity of Ads/SEO to avoid organizational silos and maximize operational synergies.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Arrêter mon budget Google Ads va-t-il faire chuter mes positions organiques ?
Un gros budget Ads peut-il accélérer le traitement d'une pénalité manuelle ?
Pourquoi certains sites à gros budgets Ads semblent-ils mieux classés en organique ?
Les données Google Ads peuvent-elles servir ma stratégie SEO ?
La politique Honest Results est-elle auditable de l'extérieur ?
🎥 From the same video 30
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 37 min · published on 09/12/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.