Official statement
Other statements from this video 22 ▾
- 2:24 Faut-il abandonner les paramètres d'URL mobiles au profit du rel=canonical ?
- 3:50 L'outil de gestion des paramètres d'URL agit-il vraiment sur l'indexation ou seulement sur le crawl ?
- 3:54 Les paramètres d'URL bloquent-ils vraiment l'indexation de vos pages ?
- 5:24 Faut-il abandonner l'outil de paramètres d'URL au profit du rel=canonical pour gérer mobile et desktop ?
- 5:41 Pourquoi la requête site: affiche-t-elle des URL que Google ne classe pas dans les SERP ?
- 10:04 Faut-il bloquer ou laisser indexer vos pages à facettes ?
- 11:14 Pourquoi Google affiche-t-il encore les anciennes URL après une migration de domaine ?
- 13:54 Est-ce que l'ancienneté d'un site protège vraiment son classement lors des mises à jour Google ?
- 22:59 Les sites non mobile-friendly sont-ils vraiment pénalisés par Google ?
- 23:01 Un site non mobile-friendly est-il vraiment pénalisé par Google ?
- 24:22 Combien de temps faut-il vraiment pour qu'une mise à jour mobile-friendly impacte vos positions ?
- 26:42 Le nombre de mots influence-t-il vraiment le classement SEO ?
- 33:38 Faut-il vraiment abandonner un domaine pénalisé ou peut-on s'en sortir autrement ?
- 41:54 Faut-il vraiment bloquer le spam de référence dans Google Analytics par pays ?
- 42:50 La vitesse mobile améliore-t-elle vraiment l'engagement au-delà du classement ?
- 43:28 La vitesse serveur impacte-t-elle vraiment le crawl budget de Google ?
- 44:58 La vitesse serveur impacte-t-elle vraiment le classement Google ou seulement le crawl ?
- 45:18 La vitesse mobile impacte-t-elle vraiment le classement Google ?
- 46:32 La vitesse de chargement pénalise-t-elle vraiment le classement des sites lents ?
- 47:36 La vitesse de chargement transforme-t-elle vraiment le comportement utilisateur ?
- 48:12 Comment Googlebot adapte-t-il automatiquement son crawl en cas d'erreurs serveur ?
- 52:48 Un site non mobile-friendly est-il vraiment pénalisé par Google ?
Google confirms that manually submitting pages via Fetch as Google or the Search Console can speed up their recognition after significant changes. This statement validates a common practice. The challenge remains to determine which changes warrant this approach and what real time savings can be expected.
What you need to understand
Why does Google encourage manual submission after changes?
Google openly acknowledges that actively submitting modified URLs can speed up their crawling and indexing. This statement formalizes what SEO practitioners have observed for years: passively waiting for Googlebot to revisit is not always optimal.
The Fetch as Google tool (now integrated into the URL Inspection tool in Search Console) allows you to force the bot to visit a specific page. In practical terms, you are requesting that Google crawl an URL immediately rather than wait for the bot’s next natural visit, which might occur in several days or even weeks, depending on the crawl budget allocated to the site.
What types of changes justify this approach?
Mueller refers to significant changes, without precisely defining the term. In practice, it is generally considered to encompass structural modifications or significant content changes: a complete redesign of a page, addition of new strategic sections, correction of blocking technical issues, changes to internal architecture.
Minor textual adjustments or cosmetic changes likely do not require this intervention. The bot will naturally revisit and detect minor changes during its next scheduled visit.
What does "over time" actually mean?
Google remains vague about the actual timelines. The phrase "over time" is deliberately unclear. In practice, huge variations are observed: some pages submitted manually are reindexed within hours, while others may take several days.
Several factors influence this speed: the perceived freshness of the site, its overall authority, the usual crawl frequency, and the availability of Googlebot resources at the time of the request. A high-traffic site with a history of frequent updates will be processed more quickly than a dormant blog that has not been active for six months.
- Manual submission speeds up crawling but does not guarantee a specific timeline
- Major changes take priority over cosmetic adjustments
- The site's crawl budget remains a limiting factor even after submission
- The authority and freshness of the site influence the recognition speed
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
Yes, but with a significant nuance: the gap between "speeding up" and "guaranteeing" is massive. On low crawl budget sites, manually submitting 50 modified URLs does not mean that all 50 will be crawled within the hour. Google prioritizes according to its own opaque criteria.
Field tests show that a site with good internal PageRank and a regular publishing frequency has its manual submissions processed within 24-48 hours. A neglected or penalized site might wait a week. [To be verified] whether this acceleration works uniformly across all site types or if Google silently filters certain requests.
What limits should you be aware of before abusing this technique?
Google imposes submission quotas that are not publicly documented. Submitting 200 URLs per day via the Search Console will likely trigger a slowdown or partial ignorance of requests. The system detects abnormal behaviors.
Another rarely mentioned point: manually submitting a page does not force it to rise in rankings. Indexing and ranking are two distinct processes. A page that is indexed quickly may take weeks to stabilize its position if quality signals are weak or if competition is fierce.
In what cases does this method fail completely?
If the site suffers from blocking technical issues (poorly configured robots.txt, residual noindex tags, chain redirects), manually submitting URLs is pointless. Googlebot will attempt to crawl, fail, and classify the URL as non-indexable.
The same goes if the site is under a manual penalty or experiencing a severe algorithmic filter. The submission will be processed, but the page will remain invisible in the results. Server logs show Googlebot's passage, but the indexing status remains blocked.
Practical impact and recommendations
What actions should be taken after a major change?
Use the URL Inspection tool in the Search Console immediately after making changes public. Paste the modified URL, perform a live test to ensure that Googlebot can access it without errors, and then click "Request Indexing". This action sends a priority signal to Google.
For changes affecting several dozen URLs (category redesign, partial migration), submit an updated XML sitemap via the Search Console. Google will prioritize crawling the URLs from the sitemap during its next visit. Combine both methods to maximize your chances: manual submission of 5-10 strategic pages + sitemap for the rest.
What errors should be avoided during submission?
Don’t overwhelm Google with redundant requests. Submitting the same URL three times a day because it isn't yet appearing in the index is counterproductive. Multiple requests do not shorten timelines and can be interpreted as spam.
Another frequent error: submitting pages with incomplete content or temporary tags (noindex, disallow). Googlebot will arrive, notice the problem, and you'll lose your "priority submission" credit for nothing. Always check that the page is technically ready before requesting indexing.
How can you verify if the strategy works?
Check the index coverage report in the Search Console 48-72 hours after submission. The processed URLs will change from "Discovered but not crawled" to "Valid". If they remain stuck, examine server logs to confirm Googlebot's visit and identify any 4xx or 5xx errors.
Also, compare the indexing delay before and after adopting this method. On a sample of 20 modified pages, note how many are indexed within 24 hours with manual submission vs without. If the gap is marginal, it indicates that your site already has a sufficient crawl budget, and manual submission adds little value.
- Submit strategic URLs via the URL Inspection tool immediately after publication
- Update the XML sitemap and submit it via Search Console for bulk changes
- Check for technical errors before any indexing request
- Do not submit the same URL multiple times within 48 hours
- Consult server logs and the coverage report 72 hours after submission
- Document indexing delays to measure the actual effectiveness of the method
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de temps après soumission manuelle Google indexe-t-il réellement une page ?
Soumettre plusieurs fois la même URL accélère-t-il le processus ?
Faut-il soumettre chaque petite modification de contenu ?
La soumission manuelle améliore-t-elle le classement de la page ?
Que faire si une URL soumise reste non indexée après 7 jours ?
🎥 From the same video 22
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h00 · published on 21/04/2015
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.