Official statement
Other statements from this video 18 ▾
- 1:06 L'outil de demande d'indexation va-t-il disparaître de Search Console ?
- 6:22 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il vos redirections 301 et choisit-il l'ancienne URL comme canonique ?
- 8:30 Comment aligner tous les signaux de canonicalisation pour influencer le choix de Google ?
- 10:04 Pourquoi Google avoue-t-il que le fonctionnement hreflang/canonical est volontairement confus dans Search Console ?
- 12:16 BERT rend-il vraiment les mots-clés exacts obsolètes en SEO ?
- 14:14 Faut-il copier le HTML exact dans le balisage Schema FAQ ou le texte suffit-il ?
- 15:25 Faut-il choisir sa stack technique en fonction du SEO ?
- 19:10 Faut-il vraiment uniformiser la structure d'URL pour mieux ranker ?
- 21:18 Google affiche-t-il vraiment un seul site quand on syndique du contenu sur plusieurs domaines ?
- 23:02 Faut-il vraiment écrire des tartines pour ranker ses pages de recettes ?
- 26:01 AVIF en SEO image : pourquoi Google Search Images ignore-t-il encore ce format ?
- 30:42 Les sous-dossiers manquants dans une URL peuvent-ils nuire au référencement de vos pages ?
- 32:52 Faut-il vraiment respecter la hiérarchie H1-H6 pour ranker sur Google ?
- 36:08 Google indexe-t-il toujours la page canonical avant la page source ?
- 38:38 Google peut-il vraiment détecter tous les domaines expirés rachetés pour leurs backlinks ?
- 40:59 Faut-il encore structurer ses pages maintenant que Google comprend les passages ?
- 43:25 Faut-il privilégier une page hub longue ou plusieurs pages détaillées pour son SEO ?
- 49:39 Combien de domaines EMD peut-on acheter sans déclencher un filtre doorway ?
Google states that redirecting WordPress attachment pages to media files is unlikely to provide any SEO benefit, as these pages are generally not indexed in a visible manner. Images are indexed from the blog posts and pages where they are embedded, not from their attachment pages. In practical terms, this practice does not change anything for your visibility in image search.
What you need to understand
What exactly are WordPress attachment pages?
WordPress automatically generates an attachment page for each media file uploaded to the library. These pages display the image, video, or document in a minimal context, often with little or no contextual text.
The issue? These attachment pages create weak and duplicate content. They sometimes include the media's title and description but rarely have substantial editorial content that would justify their indexing.
Why doesn't Google index them visibly?
Google prioritizes the indexing of images from their usage context — the blog post, product page, or landing page where they are embedded. This is where the search engine finds relevant semantic signals: alt text, captions, adjacent content.
Attachment pages, on the other hand, typically provide no strong contextual signals. Google can technically crawl them, but does not consider them worthy of display in the standard SERPs or even in Google Images.
What does this statement mean for the architecture of a WordPress site?
Mueller's statement confirms that setting up 301 redirects from attachment pages to direct media files is unlikely to change SEO outcomes. You will neither gain nor lose positions.
That said, leaving these pages accessible can create crawl waste — Google wastes time exploring URLs of no value instead of focusing on your strategic content. This is a crawl budget issue, especially on large sites.
- Attachment pages: automatically generated by WordPress for each uploaded media
- Low indexing: Google generally does not display them in search results
- Usage context priority: images are indexed from the articles/pages where they appear
- 301 redirects: redirecting to direct media files does not significantly affect SEO
- Crawl budget: leaving these pages accessible can waste crawl resources on large sites
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with field observations?
Yes, absolutely. Audits of WordPress sites regularly show that indexed attachment pages generate almost no organic traffic. When they appear in Search Console, it is often with zero impressions or positions beyond the 50th place.
The rare cases where these pages generate traffic pertain to ultra-long-tail queries or exact file name searches — in other words, accidental traffic with no commercial value. [To be verified]: Mueller uses the term "probably" — this nuance suggests that there may be exceptions, but Google does not document them.
Should you completely ignore these pages?
No, because even though Google does not index them visibly, they can create architecture issues. Thousands of accessible attachment pages dilute internal linking, create complex redirect chains if you migrate or restructure, and pollute coverage reports in Search Console.
On sites with tens of thousands of images, these attachment pages can account for 60 to 80% of the URLs crawled by Googlebot. That's crawl time wasted, and on sites with a limited crawl budget, it can delay the indexing of new strategic content.
What alternatives are there to 301 redirects?
Instead of redirecting to direct media files, several approaches are more effective. You can block indexing of attachment pages via a noindex meta robots tag while keeping them accessible to preserve existing internal links.
Or better yet: completely disable the generation of these pages via plugins like Yoast SEO or Rank Math, which offer a native option to automatically redirect to the parent article or return a 404. This approach prevents the problem at its source.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do practically on a WordPress site?
First step: audit the current state. Go to Google Search Console, Coverage or Pages section, and filter for URLs containing " /attachment/ " or " ?attachment_id= ". How many attachment pages are indexed? Do they generate traffic?
If you discover hundreds or thousands of indexed pages without traffic, this is a clear signal that action is needed. But don’t rush into 301 redirects to media files — Mueller confirms this is futile.
Which technical solution to choose based on your context?
For an existing site with already indexed attachment pages, the cleanest solution is to block them with a noindex and redirect visitors to the parent article. Yoast SEO and Rank Math provide this option with a single click.
For a new site, completely disable the generation of these pages from the start. Add this filter to your functions.php or via a redirect plugin to send directly to the parent article or a 404 if no parent exists.
How to measure the impact of these changes?
Monitor the crawl budget evolution in the Search Console Crawl Stats reports. You should see a decrease in the number of pages crawled per day, with an increase in crawl frequency on your strategic content.
Also, make sure that attachment pages gradually disappear from Google's index with a site:yourdomain.com inurl:attachment query. Indexing removal can take a few weeks, be patient.
- Audit in Search Console the number of indexed attachment pages and their traffic
- Do NOT set up 301 redirects to direct media files (useless according to Google)
- Block indexing with a noindex meta robots or completely disable the generation of these pages
- Redirect to the parent article if external backlinks exist
- Monitor crawl budget evolution and gradual deindexing in Search Console
- Document the changes to anticipate any potential side effects during future migrations
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Rediriger les pages d'attachement WordPress améliore-t-il le référencement des images ?
Faut-il bloquer complètement les pages d'attachement avec un noindex ?
Que faire si des backlinks pointent vers des pages d'attachement ?
Les pages d'attachement peuvent-elles impacter négativement le SEO ?
Comment vérifier combien de pages d'attachement sont indexées sur mon site ?
🎥 From the same video 18
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 52 min · published on 10/11/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.