Official statement
Other statements from this video 24 ▾
- 1:21 Le lazy loading tue-t-il l'indexation de votre contenu par Google ?
- 5:18 Comment vérifier si Google indexe vraiment votre contenu lazy-loaded ?
- 6:19 Pourquoi vos images restent-elles indexées bien après la disparition du contenu textuel ?
- 8:26 Faut-il vraiment archiver les produits épuisés plutôt que les laisser en rupture de stock ?
- 9:27 Les pages en rupture de stock nuisent-elles vraiment à votre référencement Google ?
- 12:05 Faut-il vraiment supprimer vos pages de produits épuisés pour éviter une pénalité qualité ?
- 17:16 Faut-il vraiment éviter toute migration après une première migration de domaine ratée ?
- 20:36 Faut-il vraiment annuler une migration de domaine ratée ou l'assumer jusqu'au bout ?
- 21:40 Comment Google traite-t-il réellement la séparation d'un site en deux entités distinctes ?
- 24:10 Google analyse-t-il vraiment l'audio de vos podcasts pour le référencement ?
- 26:27 Faut-il vraiment indexer toutes vos pages de pagination ?
- 30:06 Les pages paginées peuvent-elles vraiment disparaître des résultats Google ?
- 32:45 Les liens sortants en 404 pénalisent-ils vraiment la qualité perçue d'une page ?
- 33:49 L'EAT est-il vraiment un facteur de classement ou juste un écran de fumée Google ?
- 34:54 Les FAQ structurées aident-elles vraiment à mieux ranker dans Google ?
- 36:48 Les données structurées FAQ doivent-elles vraiment être 100% visibles sur la page ?
- 39:10 Google indexe-t-il encore le contenu Flash, ou faut-il tout migrer vers le HTML pur ?
- 41:36 Faut-il masquer les bannières RGPD à Googlebot pour éviter le cloaking ?
- 43:57 Les Quality Raters notent-ils vraiment votre site pour le déclasser ?
- 45:30 Peut-on vraiment avoir un design complètement différent entre les versions linguistiques d'un site ?
- 47:42 Les redirections 302 peuvent-elles vraiment transmettre autant de PageRank que les 301 ?
- 53:43 Les redirections 302 finissent-elles vraiment par être traitées comme des 301 permanentes ?
- 55:45 Peut-on vraiment migrer plusieurs sites vers un seul domaine avec l'outil Change of Address de Google ?
- 58:54 Pourquoi garder vos anciens sites en ligne tue-t-il votre nouveau domaine ?
Google does not immediately switch to a new canonical URL when you remove a redirect. The algorithms first observe whether the change is permanent or temporary before reacting. This deliberate persistence prevents drastic fluctuations in the index but can slow down your migrations if not managed properly.
What you need to understand
Why doesn't Google immediately track your redirect changes?
Google's canonicalization algorithms do not react in real-time to every modification of your architecture. When you remove a 301 redirect pointing from A to B, Google will not automatically revert to A as the canonical URL on the next crawl.
The engine applies a principle of canonical persistence: it retains the URL it had chosen as the reference (often B, the target of your former redirect) for some time. This inertia is not a bug — it’s a safeguard against sites that might erratically or cyclically change their redirects.
Does this persistence mean that Google suspects you of manipulation?
No. Mueller is clear: the algorithms do not think the site is deceptive when you remove a redirect. They do not impose penalties or negative filters.
They simply observe the current state of your site to determine if the change is stable. If you had A → B for six months and then remove the redirect, Google will check for several crawls that A becomes accessible again with distinct content before modifying its canonical choice.
How long does this observation phase last?
Mueller gives no specific timeline — and that’s where practitioners struggle. The duration of persistence varies based on several factors: site history, crawl frequency, and signal consistency (sitemaps, internal links, external backlinks).
In practice, delays range from a few days to several weeks. A site crawled daily with clear signals converges faster than one crawled monthly with inconsistencies between canonical tags, redirects, and internal structure.
- Google temporarily retains the previous canonical URL even after removing a redirect
- No penalties are applied — the algorithms just observe if the change is durable
- The switch speed depends on crawl frequency and the consistency of your signals
- Sites with stable history generally converge to the new canonical more quickly
- During the observation phase, both URLs may coexist in the index with mixed performance
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes, and it’s actually one of the rare statements from Mueller that perfectly aligns with what we see in production. When you reverse a migration (for instance, reverting from HTTPS to HTTP due to a technical issue), Google does not follow instantly.
I’ve seen cases where the old canonical persisted for 3 to 6 weeks after the redirect was removed, despite daily crawls. The interesting point: this inertia can work in your favor if you've made a redirect error — you have a window to correct it before Google definitively validates the change.
What nuances should be added to this statement?
Mueller talks about "canonicalization algorithms" in the plural — and this is crucial. There is no single signal that determines the canonical URL, but a combination: HTTP redirects, canonical tags, internal link structure, XML sitemaps, URL patterns in backlinks.
If you remove a redirect but all your other signals continue to point to the old target (internal links, sitemap, canonical tags), Google will stay on the old canonical even longer. The persistence that Mueller mentions extends when signals are contradictory. [To be verified]: no public data precisely quantifies the relative impact of each signal in this observation process.
In what cases does this rule not fully apply?
On highly authoritative and intensively crawled sites (news, major marketplaces), Google reacts considerably faster. The observation window is shortened because the engine has more daily data points to validate the change.
Conversely, on a site crawled once a month with few backlinks, persistence can last months — not because Google is slow, but because it simply doesn't have enough opportunities to verify that the change is stable. In these cases, forcing a recrawl via Search Console speeds up the process, but does not make it instantaneous.
Practical impact and recommendations
What concrete steps should you take to speed up canonical convergence?
Align all your signals in the same direction. If you remove a redirect from A to B and want A to become the canonical again, ensure that nothing on your site still points to B: internal links, canonical tags, XML sitemap, alternate tags.
Submit URL A via Search Console to force a quick recrawl. Monitor server logs to confirm that Googlebot is accessing A with a 200 status code. If B remains in your sitemap or if your internal links still point heavily to B, Google will consider your signals contradictory and prolong the observation phase.
What mistakes should you avoid during a redirect modification?
Never remove a redirect without checking the impact on your external backlinks. If 80% of your incoming links point to the old target B, removing the redirect A → B will fragment your PageRank and degrade your positions.
Also avoid back-and-forth actions: setting a redirect, removing it two weeks later, then putting it back a month later. These oscillations send inconsistent signals that can trigger quality filters or simply slow down Google's acceptance of your changes significantly.
How can you verify that Google has successfully switched to the new canonical?
Use the URL Inspection tool in Search Console. Look at the section "Canonical URL selected by Google" — this is the only reliable source. Do not rely solely on rankings or presence in the index via site:.
Also monitor your performance in Search Console: if you see impressions migrating from B to A gradually over 2 to 4 weeks, it means the switch is underway. A sudden switch in 48 hours is rare except for high-intensity crawl sites.
- Remove all internal references to the old target URL (links, canonical, sitemap)
- Ensure that the desired URL responds with a stable 200 code without any redirect chain
- Force a recrawl via Search Console to accelerate acknowledgment
- Monitor server logs to confirm that Googlebot regularly accesses the new URL
- Use the URL Inspection tool to verify the canonical chosen by Google
- Wait 3 to 6 weeks before considering the switch as final
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de temps Google conserve-t-il l'ancienne URL canonique après suppression d'une redirection ?
Est-ce que retirer puis remettre une redirection peut pénaliser mon site ?
Puis-je forcer Google à changer immédiatement l'URL canonique ?
Que se passe-t-il si je supprime une redirection alors que mes backlinks pointent vers l'ancienne cible ?
Comment savoir quelle URL Google considère comme canonique après un changement de redirection ?
🎥 From the same video 24
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h03 · published on 29/10/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.