What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

For larger sites, some URLs are regularly re-explored, while others may take several months to be recrawled. Submitting a sitemap file for targeted recrawls can be a good option.
28:34
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h02 💬 EN 📅 11/08/2014 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube (28:34) →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. 3:35 Les URL spam dans Search Console déclassent-elles vraiment tout votre site ?
  2. 12:29 Sous-domaines ou sous-répertoires : existe-t-il vraiment un avantage SEO ?
  3. 17:57 Les actions manuelles affectent-elles vraiment le classement global d'un site ?
  4. 33:13 Faut-il vraiment ajouter rel=nofollow sur tous les liens d'affiliation pour éviter une pénalité ?
  5. 37:03 La sandbox Google existe-t-elle vraiment ou est-ce un mythe SEO ?
  6. 43:59 Combien de temps faut-il vraiment maintenir une redirection 301 après une migration de site ?
  7. 45:51 Appliquez le noindex pour le contenu de faible valeur
  8. 55:11 Implication du passage à HTTPS
  9. 58:59 Algorithme HTTPS et influence sur l'indexation
  10. 76:01 Prochaine mise à jour de Penguin
  11. 82:05 Dépréciation des algorithmes obsolètes
📅
Official statement from (11 years ago)
TL;DR

Google regularly explores some URLs on large sites, while others may wait several months for a new visit. This discrepancy depends on opaque criteria related to crawl budget and perceived page usefulness. Mueller suggests using sitemaps to trigger targeted recrawls, a tactic whose actual effectiveness remains unclear.

What you need to understand

What causes these variable recrawl delays?

Google assigns a limited crawl budget to each site, proportionate to its size, authority, and update frequency. On a large site, Googlebot has to make choices: which pages deserve frequent exploration, and which can wait.

Strategic pages (homepage, main categories, fresh content receiving traffic) are recrawled every hour or daily. Deep, stable, or infrequently visited pages can linger in limbo for weeks or even entire quarters.

Is the sitemap really effective in speeding up recrawls?

Mueller recommends submitting a targeted sitemap to encourage Google to revisit certain URLs. Specifically, this means creating thematic or temporary sitemaps that include only recently modified pages, rather than a global file listing 50,000 stable URLs.

This approach works best on press or e-commerce sites, where updates are frequent and signal to Google that a visit is necessary. On a corporate site with few changes, the impact remains minimal.

How does Google decide which pages to crawl first?

No one knows the exact algorithm, but several documented signals play a role: modification frequency, incoming organic traffic, depth in the hierarchy, quality of internal and external backlinks, loading time.

Content that attracts direct traffic or clicks from the SERP will be recrawled more often. An orphan page, slow to load, with no internal links or backlinks, may be ignored for months even if it is listed in the sitemap.

  • Limited crawl budget: Google cannot explore all pages of a large site continuously.
  • Priority to active pages: those that change often or generate traffic are recrawled quickly.
  • Targeted sitemaps: focusing on recent or modified URLs in a dedicated sitemap may accelerate their processing.
  • Freshness signals: content changes, link additions, and clicks from the SERP influence recrawl frequency.
  • Forgotten deep pages: a URL five clicks from the homepage, with no external links, may wait several months for a new crawl.

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with field observations?

Yes, largely so. Server logs show massive disparities in crawl frequencies: some e-commerce categories are visited every hour, while disabled product pages or blog archives may remain ignored for three months.

The recommendation regarding sitemaps has been well-known for a long time, but Mueller does not provide any numbers or guarantees. It is a soft suggestion, not a promise of acceleration. [To verify]: no public data shows that submitting a sitemap significantly shortens the recrawl time on a site that already manages its internal linking well.

What nuances should be added to this advice?

The sitemap is not a magic wand. If your page is slow, orphaned, or considered low-quality content, the sitemap will not change that. Google can read your XML file and deliberately decide not to explore the listed URLs.

Moreover, creating too many thematic sitemaps can complicate maintenance: if you have 15 different sitemaps and forget to update one, you create noise. It is better to have a clean global sitemap with reliable <lastmod> tags than a fragmented, confusing setup.

When doesn't this rule apply?

On small sites (fewer than 500 pages), Google generally explores the entire site within a few days. The crawl budget issue does not really arise unless the site is technically disastrous (chain redirects, 5xx errors, response times > two seconds).

Sites with a flat architecture and solid internal linking also reduce the problem: if all your important pages are two clicks away from the homepage and receive internal PageRank, Google crawls them more frequently, whether there's a sitemap or not.

Warning: submitting a sitemap filled with unnecessary URLs (duplicate parameters, infinite pagination, soft 404s) can dilute the crawl budget and slow down the exploration of important pages. Quality over quantity.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do to optimize recrawling?

Start by cleaning your sitemap. Remove all URLs with 3xx, 4xx, 5xx errors, canonicalized to another page, or blocked by robots.txt. A clean sitemap only contains indexable and useful 200 URLs.

Then, enable the <lastmod> tags in your sitemap and ensure they reflect reality. If you modify a product page, the date should be automatically updated. Google uses this signal to prioritize its visits.

What mistakes should be avoided on large sites?

Do not create a giant sitemap of 100,000 URLs of which 80% have not changed in two years. Google will crawl it, see that there’s nothing new, and space out its visits. Segment by theme or update frequency.

Avoid submitting redundant sitemaps: if you have a global sitemap AND category sitemaps listing the same URLs, you create confusion. Google may crawl the same pages twice and ignore other areas of the site.

How can I check if my site is being crawled properly?

Use the Search Console: the

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Combien de temps faut-il attendre pour qu'une page modifiée soit recrawlée ?
Cela dépend de la taille du site et de l'importance de la page. Sur un gros site, une page profonde peut attendre plusieurs semaines voire mois. Une homepage ou catégorie principale sera recrawlée en quelques heures.
Soumettre un sitemap garantit-il un recrawl rapide ?
Non. Le sitemap indique à Google les URL à explorer, mais ne garantit ni le délai ni la fréquence. Google décide en fonction de son crawl budget et de la perception de valeur de la page.
Peut-on forcer Google à recrawler une URL spécifique immédiatement ?
Oui, via l'outil d'inspection d'URL dans Search Console, en demandant une indexation. Mais Google peut refuser ou prioriser d'autres URL. Ce n'est pas une garantie instantanée.
Les pages sans trafic sont-elles moins souvent crawlées ?
Généralement oui. Une page qui ne génère ni clics ni impressions dans la SERP est perçue comme moins prioritaire. Google espace ses visites pour économiser son crawl budget.
Faut-il créer plusieurs sitemaps ou un seul fichier global ?
Cela dépend de la taille et de la fréquence de mise à jour. Un site de 50 000 pages avec des zones actualisées quotidiennement gagne à segmenter. Un site de 2 000 pages stables peut se contenter d'un seul sitemap propre.
🏷 Related Topics
Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO Domain Name PDF & Files Search Console

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h02 · published on 11/08/2014

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.