Official statement
Other statements from this video 14 ▾
- 71:00 Faut-il vraiment utiliser nofollow sur tous les liens placés dans vos guest posts ?
- 116:10 Faut-il indexer le contenu généré par vos utilisateurs ?
- 214:05 Google possède-t-il vraiment un index unique pour tous les pays ?
- 301:17 Comment éviter les pénalités doorway pages quand on gère plusieurs sites avec du contenu dupliqué ?
- 515:00 Le Domain Authority et Alexa Rank influencent-ils vraiment votre positionnement Google ?
- 550:47 Faut-il vraiment ignorer les liens toxiques puisque Google les filtre automatiquement ?
- 560:20 Pourquoi les liens soumis au disavow restent-ils visibles dans Search Console ?
- 590:56 Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils vraiment décisifs pour votre ranking Google ?
- 618:17 Pourquoi les outils de test CWV ne reflètent-ils pas votre classement réel ?
- 643:34 Désactiver des plugins WordPress peut-il vraiment booster votre SEO ?
- 666:40 Google applique-t-il vraiment une politique de non-favoritisme interne en SEO ?
- 794:50 Peut-on forcer l'affichage des sitelinks avec du balisage schema ?
- 836:14 Faut-il vraiment éviter les déploiements progressifs lors du passage au mobile-first indexing ?
- 913:36 Les cookie banners bloquent-ils vraiment l'indexation de vos pages ?
John Mueller states that breadcrumbs offer nothing for crawl or ranking since links to higher levels already exist in regular navigation. Their only purpose lies in enriched display of search results. However, this statement deserves some nuance: on poorly structured sites, breadcrumbs can be the only source of coherent internal linking.
What you need to understand
Why does Google downplay the crawling impact of breadcrumbs?<\/h3>
The logic of Mueller<\/strong> is simple: if your site has standard navigation (menu, footer, sidebar), the upward links<\/strong> to parent categories already exist. Breadcrumbs merely duplicate these paths.<\/p> Therefore, Googlebot doesn't need this additional markup to discover and index your hierarchical levels<\/strong>. Crawling relies on the entire link graph, not just a single technical implementation.<\/p> The advantage recognized by Google lies solely in SERP display<\/strong>. Structured breadcrumbs via Schema.org BreadcrumbList allow the green URL to be replaced with a clickable navigation path<\/strong>.<\/p> This rich snippet improves the click-through rate<\/strong> by making the content hierarchy more readable for users. It's a UX gain that indirectly impacts traffic but doesn't directly affect algorithmic ranking<\/strong>.<\/p> Mueller refers to a standard case where "the links to higher levels already exist in the usual interface." If your link architecture<\/strong> relies solely on breadcrumbs, the situation changes drastically.<\/p> On some poorly designed e-commerce sites or blogs, breadcrumbs are the only source of contextual links<\/strong> to categories. In such cases, they become a mechanical factor for crawling and internal PageRank distribution.<\/p>What is the real value of breadcrumbs according to Google?<\/h3>
Does this statement apply to all sites?<\/h3>
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?<\/h3>
Yes and no. On sites with a strong navigation<\/strong> (main menu, filters, sidebar), it is indeed observed that removing breadcrumbs doesn't change crawling or rankings. Bots find the same pages through other paths.<\/p> However, on sites where the internal linking<\/strong> is weak or non-existent outside of breadcrumbs, variations are noticeable. Some deep pages lose crawl frequency or internal PageRank when the breadcrumb is removed. [To verify]<\/strong> to what extent Google weighs these links differently based on their context.<\/p> Mueller adopts a classic defensive<\/strong> stance: minimizing the importance of a signal to avoid over-optimizations. But he fails to mention that breadcrumbs have a significant indirect impact<\/strong>.<\/p> First, the improvement in CTR in SERPs via rich snippets influences behavioral signals<\/strong>. Next, on mobile, where space is limited, well-visible breadcrumbs reduce bounce rates and improve visit depth<\/strong>. These metrics feed relevance algorithms.<\/p> On flat architecture<\/strong> sites (product pages without categories), breadcrumbs can be the only thematic link to hub pages. Their removal then degrades PageRank distribution<\/strong>.<\/p> Similarly, on sites generating complex dynamic URLs, breadcrumbs provide a semantic structure<\/strong> that Google can prefer to understand the hierarchy. The algorithm is not binary: it weighs signals based on their overall coherence.<\/p>What nuances should be added to Mueller's statement?<\/h3>
In what cases does this rule not apply?<\/h3>
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you actually do with your breadcrumbs?<\/h3>
Always keep them, but optimize their technical implementation<\/strong>. Use the Schema.org BreadcrumbList markup to ensure rich display in SERPs. Check in Search Console that Google correctly detects your breadcrumbs.<\/p> Ensure that your breadcrumbs reflect the actual hierarchy<\/strong> of the site, not a fictitious taxonomy. Inconsistencies between breadcrumbs and URL structure create noise for algorithms.<\/p> Never rely solely on breadcrumbs for your internal linking<\/strong>. They should complement a robust navigation (menu, contextual links, related products), not replace it.<\/p> Avoid breadcrumbs that are too long or have too many levels. Beyond 4-5 levels, SERP display becomes confusing and users lose track. Prioritize clarity<\/strong> over completeness.<\/p> Test your breadcrumbs in Google's rich results test<\/strong>. Verify that each level has a clear name and a valid URL. Ensure that JSON-LD or microdata markup is correctly detected.<\/p> Analyze your category pages<\/strong>: if they receive little crawl or internal PageRank despite breadcrumbs, it indicates that your main navigation is failing. Breadcrumbs mask the problem without solving it.<\/p>What mistakes should be avoided in managing breadcrumbs?<\/h3>
How can you check if your implementation is optimal?<\/h3>
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Faut-il supprimer les breadcrumbs si Google dit qu'ils n'aident pas au crawl ?
Le balisage Schema.org des breadcrumbs est-il obligatoire ?
Les breadcrumbs peuvent-ils compenser une navigation défaillante ?
Un fil d'Ariane améliore-t-il le PageRank interne des pages supérieures ?
Comment vérifier que Google détecte correctement mes breadcrumbs ?
🎥 From the same video 14
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 961h48 · published on 19/03/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →Related statements
Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations
Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.