Official statement
Other statements from this video 22 ▾
- 2:04 Pourquoi vos données de clics disparaissent-elles entre Search Console et Analytics après une migration HTTPS ?
- 2:04 Pourquoi Google ne détecte-t-il pas automatiquement votre migration HTTPS dans la Search Console ?
- 3:38 Les backlinks spam .xyz et autres domaines douteux nuisent-ils vraiment au SEO ?
- 3:41 Faut-il vraiment désavouer les backlinks de mauvaise qualité ?
- 6:34 La compatibilité mobile est-elle vraiment obligatoire pour ranker en top position ?
- 7:13 La compatibilité mobile reste-t-elle vraiment déterminante pour le classement ?
- 9:29 Comment Google transfère-t-il réellement les signaux lors d'un changement de domaine ?
- 10:27 Google transfère-t-il vraiment tous les signaux lors d'une migration de domaine ?
- 12:09 Le contenu en accordéon nuit-il vraiment au référencement de vos pages ?
- 15:42 Faut-il vraiment limiter les structured data à un seul produit par page pour obtenir des rich snippets ?
- 16:49 Faut-il vraiment créer une page distincte pour chaque produit balisé en Rich Snippets ?
- 28:53 Pourquoi vos sitemaps XML s'affichent-ils dans les résultats de recherche et comment l'empêcher ?
- 30:00 Les sous-domaines peuvent-ils vraiment affiner le filtrage SafeSearch de Google ?
- 30:26 Faut-il vraiment corriger toutes les erreurs de crawl dans Search Console ?
- 32:53 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter des erreurs de titres dupliqués dans la Search Console ?
- 36:12 Google fusionne-t-il vraiment vos contenus multilingues en une seule entité de classement ?
- 38:13 Hreflang booste-t-il vraiment votre visibilité internationale ?
- 42:42 Faut-il vraiment sacrifier la qualité visuelle pour gagner quelques millisecondes ?
- 45:58 Pourquoi Google n'indexe-t-il pas les images intégrées en CSS Sprites pour la recherche visuelle ?
- 50:00 Faut-il vraiment paniquer devant une hausse des erreurs de crawl dans Search Console ?
- 54:03 Faut-il vraiment afficher tout votre contenu au premier chargement pour être indexé ?
- 74:16 Optimiser la vitesse jusqu'à l'obsession apporte-t-il vraiment un gain SEO mesurable ?
Google recommends using the geographic targeting setting in Search Console to differentiate the regional versions of a multilingual or multiregional site. This setup helps the algorithm understand which version to display based on the user's location and could improve local rankings. Specifically, this means that your country-specific subdomains or directories must be explicitly declared with their respective geographic targets.
What you need to understand
Why does Google emphasize geotargeting in Search Console?
Google processes billions of queries every day from different countries and regions. When a site offers multiple versions for different markets (exemple.fr, exemple.be, exemple.ch), the algorithm must decide which version to display to a Belgian user searching for your services.
Without an explicit signal from you, Google relies solely on indirect technical signals: domain extension (.fr, .be), content language, server IP address, local backlinks. These clues might suffice for a ccTLD (.fr vs .be), but become ambiguous for subdomain structures (fr.exemple.com, be.exemple.com) or subdirectories (exemple.com/fr/, exemple.com/be/).
What is the geographic targeting setting in Search Console?
Accessible in Search Console under Settings > Site Settings, this tool allows you to explicitly declare the geographic area targeted by each property. You can specify a specific country (France, Belgium, Canada) or choose "Not listed" for an international site without specific targeting.
This setting applies only to generic domains (.com, .org, .net) and subdomain or subdirectory structures. ccTLDs like .fr or .be already have an implicit geographic targeting that you cannot modify in Search Console.
How does this configuration actually affect ranking?
Mueller states that this setting helps to "improve local ranking". In practice, geotargeting acts as a signal for geographic relevance among others. It does not serve as a magical positioning boost, but rather as a selection filter.
When a user in Belgium searches for "marketing agency," Google favors geolocalized results in Belgium. If your site offers both be.exemple.com and fr.exemple.com, the Search Console setting clearly indicates which one to serve. Without this signal, Google could show the wrong version or dilute the perceived relevance by hesitating between the two.
- Geotargeting does not replace other signals: hreflang, localized content, and regional backlinks remain essential
- It clarifies your intentions to the algorithm and reduces indexing ambiguities
- Stronger impact for multiregional .com structures than for ccTLDs already geo-targeted by nature
- Avoids cannibalization between regional versions targeting the same queries
- Improves user experience by serving the right version right from the SERPs
SEO Expert opinion
Is this recommendation consistent with field observations?
On paper, the logic holds. In practice, results vary greatly depending on the chosen technical structure. Sites with multiple ccTLDs (exemple.fr, exemple.be, exemple.ch) usually do not need this setting since the extension already acts as a strong geographic signal.
However, architectures using subdomains or subdirectories on a .com or .net clearly benefit from this clarification. I have observed cases where poorly configured multiregional sites had their .com/fr/ version showing up in Belgium or Switzerland, diluting local relevance and frustrating users with inappropriate references (prices in French euros, French legal notices, etc.).
What nuances should be added to this statement?
Mueller remains deliberately vague about the actual extent of the impact on ranking. He uses "improve" without quantifying. [To be verified]: no official Google study quantifies the position gain related solely to geotargeting in Search Console.
From experience, this parameter acts more like a tie-breaking signal between competing versions. If two pages have equivalent quality signals, the one with the correct geographic targeting will have the advantage. But it will never compensate for a deficit of local backlinks, poorly localized content, or absent hreflang tags.
In what cases can this configuration become counterproductive?
Be careful with sites that have a truly international focus without a specific geographic anchor. If your service addresses all French speakers around the world (global SaaS platform, international media), forcing a geotargeting France or Belgium will artificially restrict your visibility elsewhere.
Another trap: frequent changes in targeting. Altering this setting sends a geographic repositioning signal to Google, which may temporarily disturb your rankings while the algorithm reassesses your regional relevance. Change this setting only if your business strategy genuinely evolves.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you configure in Search Console?
Start by identifying your multiregional architecture: multiple ccTLDs, subdomains, subdirectories, or a hybrid mix. For each Search Console property corresponding to a regional version (fr.exemple.com, exemple.com/be/, etc.), go to Settings > Site Settings.
Select the appropriate target country from the dropdown menu. If your version addresses multiple French-speaking countries without distinction (France + Belgium + Switzerland), choose "Not listed". Confirm and repeat for each regional property in your ecosystem.
What common mistakes should absolutely be avoided?
Never configure a conflicting geographic targeting with your hreflang tags. If your hreflang tags declare hreflang="fr-BE" (French Belgium) but Search Console targets France, you send opposing signals to Google. The algorithm may get confused and serve the wrong version.
Another frequent mistake: forgetting to create distinct Search Console properties for each regional version. If you manage exemple.com/fr/ and exemple.com/be/ in one global Search Console property for exemple.com, you will not be able to apply differentiated geotargeting. It is imperative to create separate "URL prefix" type properties.
How can you check if the configuration has the desired effect?
Monitor your impressions by country in the Performance report of Search Console. After configuring the geotargeting, you should observe a gradual concentration of impressions in the targeted country for this version. If exemple.be continues generating 40% of its impressions in France a month after the setup, a problem persists.
Also test with geolocalized searches: use a VPN or Google’s preview tools (adding the &gl=BE parameter in the search URL) to check which version displays based on the country. If the wrong version appears consistently, review your hreflang tags, your localized content, and your regional backlinks.
- Create a distinct Search Console property for each regional version (subdomain or subdirectory)
- Set the appropriate geographic targeting in Settings > Site Settings for each property
- Check alignment with hreflang tags declared in the source code
- Monitor changes in impressions by country in the Performance report over 4-6 weeks
- Audit backlinks to strengthen geographic signals (links from sites in the target country)
- Truly localize the content (currencies, examples, legal notices, local contact details)
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le geotargeting Search Console fonctionne-t-il pour les sites en ccTLD comme .fr ou .be ?
Peut-on cibler plusieurs pays avec une seule propriété Search Console ?
Combien de temps faut-il pour observer l'impact d'un changement de geotargeting ?
Le geotargeting peut-il compenser des balises hreflang mal configurées ?
Faut-il choisir 'Non listé' pour un site e-commerce qui livre dans toute l'Europe ?
🎥 From the same video 22
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 49 min · published on 22/09/2016
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.