Official statement
Other statements from this video 17 ▾
- 1:06 Pourquoi Google affiche-t-il soudainement plus d'URLs non indexées dans Search Console ?
- 3:11 Le crawl budget : pourquoi Google ne crawle-t-il qu'une fraction de vos pages connues ?
- 5:17 Core Web Vitals : pourquoi vos tests en laboratoire ne servent-ils à rien pour le ranking ?
- 9:30 Le contenu généré par les utilisateurs engage-t-il vraiment la responsabilité SEO du site ?
- 11:03 Faut-il vraiment inclure toutes vos pages dans un sitemap général ?
- 12:05 Le crawl budget varie-t-il selon l'origine du contenu ?
- 13:08 Googlebot envoie-t-il un referrer HTTP lors du crawl de votre site ?
- 14:09 La qualité des images influence-t-elle vraiment le ranking dans la recherche web Google ?
- 20:19 Pourquoi un site bien positionné peut-il perdre sa pertinence sans avoir commis d'erreur ?
- 21:53 Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils vraiment un facteur de ranking ou juste un écran de fumée ?
- 22:57 Discover fonctionne-t-il vraiment sans critères techniques stricts ?
- 25:02 Retirer des pages d'un sitemap peut-il limiter leur crawl par Google ?
- 27:08 Faut-il vraiment utiliser unavailable_after pour gérer le contenu temporaire ?
- 30:11 Le structured data influence-t-il réellement le ranking dans Google ?
- 31:45 Pourquoi Google indexe-t-il parfois vos pages AMP avant leur version HTML canonique ?
- 33:52 Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils vraiment décisifs pour le ranking Google ?
- 35:51 Google voit-il vraiment le contenu chargé dynamiquement après un clic utilisateur ?
Google determines a page's importance not by the volume of content on a topic, but by its position in the architecture and the quality of the internal links pointing to it. A page accessible from the homepage with relevant anchor text will be considered more critical than a page buried 5 clicks deep. Practically speaking, this means rethinking the distribution of internal PageRank and stopping the multiplication of low-value pages.
What you need to understand
Why does position in architecture matter more than page volume?
Google thinks in terms of proximity to the homepage and internal PageRank flow. A page directly linked from the homepage sends a strong signal: it is deemed important by the site itself. Conversely, a page buried several levels deep — even if it addresses a strategic topic — will be seen as secondary.
The absolute number of pages on a given theme does not automatically create topical authority. Publishing 200 SEO articles impresses Google only if those pages are genuinely linked, accessible, and structured coherently. Otherwise, they remain invisible within the site's internal graph.
What does 'important' anchor text mean according to Google?
Mueller refers to the descriptive and contextual link anchor. A link from the homepage with the anchor “Our Technical SEO Audit Services” carries more weight than a generic link like “Learn More” or “Click Here”. Google uses this anchor text to understand the topic of the target page and refine its relevance assessment.
This ties back to the old principle of thematic PageRank: the context of the link and the anchor text influence the signal transmitted. A poorly labeled link dilutes the signal, even if it comes from a powerful page. Therefore, the choice of anchors becomes an underrated tactical lever in optimizing internal linking.
How does Google measure a page's 'internal visibility'?
Google relies on several combined signals: the click depth from the site root, the number and quality of incoming internal links, and the crawl frequency of those pages. A page accessible in 2 clicks and linked from 10 strategic pages will be crawled more often and deemed more important than an isolated page 6 clicks deep.
This approach explains why some sites with flat architectures (few levels) perform better than deep sites, even with less content. The redistribution of link juice should be thought of as a hydraulic system: each link is a pipe, and PageRank must flow efficiently to priority pages.
- The click depth from the homepage is a stronger importance signal than the volume of published pages.
- The anchor text of internal links must be descriptive and contextualized to convey a clear thematic signal.
- Multiplying pages on a topic without properly linking them does not create topical authority — it fragments internal PageRank.
- A flat and well-linked architecture often outperforms a deep structure, even with equal content volume.
- Google measures internal visibility by the allocated crawl budget and the frequency of bot visits to those URLs.
SEO Expert opinion
Does this statement align with what we observe in the field?
Yes, absolutely. Audits regularly show that sites with a well-linked silo architecture outperform those that amass content in bulk. A client with 50 strategically linked pages can dominate a competitor with 500 scattered pages lacking internal logic. Internal PageRank remains one of the most underutilized levers in on-page SEO.
However, Mueller remains deliberately vague about thresholds. How many clicks deep is acceptable? 3? 5? 10? No public data. Similarly, the relative weight of anchor text vs. proximity to the homepage is never quantified. We work with directional principles, not absolute metrics. [To be verified] on the exact impact ratios between these variables.
What nuances should be made to this general principle?
Be careful not to bring everything back to the homepage. On larger e-commerce or editorial sites, it’s not always the pages close to the root that convert best. A deeply buried product page but highly linked from powerful category pages can perform very well. It’s the overall flow of PageRank that counts, not solely the direct distance to the homepage.
Moreover, the link type plays a role: a contextual link in the body of text carries more weight than a footer or dropdown menu link. Google can differentiate between an editorial link and a generic navigation link. Multiplying footer links to a page won’t make it a strategic priority — it may even be perceived as internal over-optimization.
In what cases does this rule not fully apply?
Sites with very high domain authority can afford deeper architectures without major penalties. A site like Wikipedia or a national media outlet consistently crawled does not face the same constraints as a new blog. With an almost limitless crawl budget, click depth impacts their indexing less.
Another case: sites with many deep backlinks. If a buried page receives regular quality external links, Google will naturally assign it more importance, even if it’s poorly positioned in the internal architecture. External linking can partially compensate for poor internal structure.
Practical impact and recommendations
What immediate steps should you take on your site?
First action: audit the click depth of your strategic pages. Use Screaming Frog, Oncrawl, or Botify to identify important URLs located more than 3-4 clicks from the homepage. If a priority page is buried, add links from higher-level pages — ideally the homepage, key category pages, or thematic hubs.
Second lever: revise your internal anchor texts. Replace “Click Here,” “Learn More,” “Read More” with descriptive anchors rich in keywords. For instance, instead of “Discover Our Service,” use “Comprehensive Technical SEO Audit.” This strengthens the thematic signal transmitted to the target page.
What mistakes should be avoided in internal linking?
Do not overload the homepage with dozens of links. This dilutes the PageRank transmitted to each URL and makes navigation unreadable. Prefer 5 to 10 strategic links, then build relay pages (categories, hubs) that redistribute juice to level 3 pages and beyond.
Avoid link loops without logic. Linking page A → B → C → A without adding value creates noise in the graph. Each internal link should have a clear editorial or structural justification. Also, don’t multiply footer or sidebar links to the same pages — Google assigns more weight to contextual links within the body of content.
How to verify that your architecture is optimized?
Run a full crawl with a technical tool and analyze the distribution of internal PageRank (available in Oncrawl, Botify, or via a custom calculation). Identify high commercial or editorial potential pages that receive little PageRank, and rebalance the structure by adding strategic links.
Also, monitor the crawl rate of important pages in Google Search Console. If a priority URL is not crawled regularly, it’s often a symptom of poor internal visibility. Finally, compare your performance before/after link optimization: you should see an improvement in indexing rate and, in the medium term, gains in positions on targeted queries.
- Audit the click depth of all strategic pages (goal: max 3-4 clicks from the homepage)
- Replace generic anchor texts with descriptive and contextualized anchors
- Identify priority pages receiving little internal PageRank and add links from thematic hubs
- Clean redundant footer/sidebar links and prioritize contextual links within the body content
- Create relay pages (categories, hubs) to redistribute PageRank without overloading the homepage
- Monitor the crawl rate of important pages in Google Search Console
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de clics depuis la homepage est considéré comme trop profond par Google ?
Faut-il lier toutes les pages importantes depuis la homepage ?
Les liens footer ou sidebar ont-ils le même poids que les liens contextuels ?
Le nombre total de pages sur un sujet influence-t-il le classement ?
Comment mesurer concrètement le PageRank interne de mes pages ?
🎥 From the same video 17
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 37 min · published on 12/06/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.