Official statement
Other statements from this video 15 ▾
- 1:37 Should you really wait for Google to automatically reindex your pages after a 404?
- 4:26 Do orphan pages remain indexed even without internal links?
- 6:58 Do orphan pages really impact your crawl budget?
- 10:44 Can hreflang and canonical tags really work together without disrupting multilingual indexing?
- 12:26 Do you really need to mention every exact keyword in your content to rank?
- 17:43 Does a good Google ranking really indicate quality content?
- 20:52 Do keywords in URLs really improve SEO?
- 28:26 Why should your sitemap URLs match exactly with your internal linking?
- 31:29 How does Google actually decide the crawling frequency of your pages?
- 33:14 Should you really rely on the site: command for indexing audits?
- 37:20 Why does an URL change cause your rankings to drop for weeks?
- 45:41 How does Google actually detect videos for ranking in universal search?
- 47:25 Should you really deindex your past events, or could you risk losing organic traffic?
- 49:13 How can you effectively block malicious or unnecessary dynamic URLs generated by your site?
- 94:36 Is Google really retiring Keyword Planner for relevance analysis?
Mueller confirms that switching from HTTP to HTTPS better preserves rankings if nothing else is changed. Simultaneously modifying URL structure increases variables and complicates diagnostics in case of a drop. Specifically: first migrate to HTTPS, stabilize for 4 to 6 weeks, then tackle URL restructuring if necessary.
What you need to understand
Why does Google emphasize separating these processes?
Every technical change sends crawling signals to Google. A switch to HTTPS already triggers a massive reevaluation: new canonical URLs, 301 redirects, gradual reindexing. If you also change the URL structure (shifting from /page.php?id=123 to /category/page-title/), you layer two sets of redirects and complicate the propagation of internal PageRank.
Google then has to manage a double cascade: HTTP to HTTPS, followed by old hierarchy to new hierarchy. Each layer slows down crawling and dilutes signals. You will never know if a drop in traffic is due to misconfigured HTTPS, poorly understood new URLs, or a saturated crawl budget.
What actually happens if everything gets mixed up?
You create a scenario of double migration: Google must first understand that http://example.com/product.php?id=42 redirects to https://example.com/product.php?id=42, and then that this URL redirects to https://example.com/store/product-name/. The result: chains of redirects, slowed crawl, diluted signals.
Fluctuations become impossible to diagnose. Does a 20% drop in category traffic come from an issue with HTTPS canonicalization, an error in the new rewrite rules, or broken internal linking from the hierarchy change? You are left in the fog.
Is HTTPS alone truly sufficient to stabilize rankings?
Mueller speaks of "facilitating the maintenance of rankings," not improving them. HTTPS has been a light ranking signal for years, but its direct impact remains minimal. What matters is the continuity of signals: if your HTTP→HTTPS redirects are clean (permanent 301s, no chains), Google transfers PageRank without significant loss.
But be aware: even a clean switch to HTTPS causes micro-fluctuations for 2 to 4 weeks. Google crawls, reindexes, recalculates. If you add a URL redesign on top, you double this window of instability. [To be verified] Depending on the site size, some report stabilization periods up to 8 weeks for large e-commerce catalogs.
- Separate the processes: HTTPS first, URL redesign later (minimum 4-6 weeks apart)
- Avoid redirect chains: a single step HTTP→HTTPS, never HTTP→HTTPS→new URL
- Monitor the crawl: Search Console must show full HTTPS indexing before any other migration
- Document everything: if you mix, you'll never know which variable caused the drop
- HTTPS alone does not boost rankings: it's a prerequisite, not a growth lever
SEO Expert opinion
Is this guideline really followed in practice?
Let's be honest: the majority of the redesigns I audit violate this rule. Clients want to do everything at once — switching to HTTPS, new hierarchy, new CMS, new design — to "minimize interruptions." The result: three months of sterile diagnostics when rankings drop by 30%. Impossible to pinpoint the culprit.
The few clean migrations I've followed confirm Mueller's guideline: HTTPS first, stabilization, then URL redesign. Sites that adhered to this sequence experienced less than a 5% drop in traffic during the HTTPS window, recovered within 3 weeks. Those that mixed everything lost 15-25% for 2 to 4 months. Field data supports this statement.
What are the flaws in this recommendation?
Mueller simplifies. On a large e-commerce site (100k+ URLs), separating HTTPS and URL redesign means doubling development, testing, and deployment costs. Certain technical contexts—legacy platform migration, contractual constraints with hosts—make this sequencing unrealistic.
Then there’s the case of sites with massive duplicate content: if your HTTP is riddled with wild parameters (?sort=, ?filter=, ?page=), moving to HTTPS without cleaning up the structure means duplicating the pollution. It may be healthier to handle everything at once, even if it means enduring 6 months of turbulence. [To be verified]: I have never seen Google document this specific scenario.
Does Google underestimate the organizational challenges?
Yes. Convincing a client to spread a migration over 12 weeks instead of 3 is a political battle. Management wants a "big bang" to limit mobilized resources. Explaining that we'll need to crawl the site twice, deploy dev, QA, and SEO teams twice, rarely goes over well.
The real difficulty is not technical; it’s organizational. Mueller provides the proper steps to follow, but he doesn’t explain how to sell this timeline to an executive team seeking visible results by the end of the quarter. The result: on-the-ground SEOs make compromises, and migrations become risky bets instead of well-managed projects.
Practical impact and recommendations
How can you effectively organize an HTTPS migration without touching the URLs?
First step: install the SSL certificate and configure 301 HTTP→HTTPS redirects on all URLs, including old 404 pages. Test with a complete local crawl (Screaming Frog, Oncrawl) to ensure there are no redirect chains or loops. Each HTTP URL must redirect in a single step to its HTTPS equivalent.
Next, update all hard-coded internal links in your templates, menus, footers. Don't rely solely on redirects: each internal link should point directly to HTTPS to avoid wasting crawl budget. Also check canonicals, hreflang, XML sitemaps, robots.txt. Everything should point to HTTPS before going live.
What mistakes cause the most damage during an HTTPS transition?
The classic error: leaving resources (CSS, JS, images) in HTTP on HTTPS pages. This generates mixed content warnings in Chrome and can block display. Google crawls these pages as broken, and you lose positions unnecessarily. Scan your entire site with a tool that detects mixed content before launching the migration.
Another trap: failing to declare the HTTPS property in Search Console as the main property. Google treats HTTP and HTTPS as two distinct sites. If you don't force the switch through the Console, Google will continue to crawl predominantly in HTTP for weeks. The result: mixed indexing, cannibalization, unstable rankings.
Should you wait a specific timeframe before launching a URL redesign after HTTPS?
Yes. Wait until 95% of your HTTPS pages are indexed in Search Console. This generally takes 4 to 6 weeks for a medium-sized site (10k-50k URLs). For a large catalog, expect 8 to 12 weeks. Monitor the indexing coverage report: when the HTTP URLs have nearly disappeared and HTTPS dominates, you are ready.
Don't rely solely on the calendar deadline. A poorly crawled site (insufficient crawl budget, deep hierarchy) may stagnate for months. If after 8 weeks you still have 30% HTTP URLs indexed, do not launch a URL redesign over this. Address the crawl problem first: optimize internal linking, remove unnecessary URLs, increase the frequency of sitemap updates.
- Install the SSL certificate and configure 301 HTTP→HTTPS redirects (one step, no chains)
- Update all hard-coded internal links, canonicals, hreflang, XML sitemaps to HTTPS
- Scan the site to detect and fix any mixed content (HTTP resources on HTTPS pages)
- Declare the HTTPS property in Search Console and set it as primary
- Monitor HTTPS indexing for at least 4-6 weeks before any other migrations
- Only launch a URL redesign after complete stabilization (95% of HTTPS URLs indexed)
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Peut-on perdre des positions en passant simplement de HTTP à HTTPS sans rien changer d'autre ?
Combien de temps faut-il attendre entre le passage HTTPS et une refonte d'URL ?
Les redirections HTTP vers HTTPS doivent-elles être en 301 ou 302 ?
Faut-il garder les anciennes URL HTTP actives après la migration HTTPS ?
Le passage HTTPS améliore-t-il vraiment les positions dans Google ?
🎥 From the same video 15
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h11 · published on 02/12/2016
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.