Official statement
Other statements from this video 9 ▾
- 5:17 Pourquoi les mises à jour algorithmiques de Google ne signifient-elles pas que votre site est mauvais ?
- 7:01 Pourquoi le nombre de backlinks affichés dans Search Console change-t-il sans raison apparente ?
- 18:45 Faut-il vraiment désavouer vos backlinks ou est-ce une perte de temps ?
- 20:06 Pourquoi vos extraits enrichis n'apparaissent-ils pas toujours dans les résultats Google ?
- 22:43 Hreflang : Google recommande-t-il vraiment ce balisage pour tous les sites multilingues ?
- 26:40 Le contenu dupliqué sur plusieurs TLD est-il vraiment sans risque avec hreflang ?
- 33:46 Les erreurs 503 vont-elles vraiment pénaliser votre indexation ?
- 48:42 Faut-il désavouer un auteur à mauvaise réputation pour préserver son SEO ?
- 80:16 La qualité globale de votre site pénalise-t-elle vos meilleures pages ?
Google states that 301 redirects remain the recommended method for migrating a site from HTTP to HTTPS, allowing for a unified transfer of signals rather than handling each URL individually. This approach ensures that PageRank, trust history, and quality signals are effectively passed on to the new secure URLs. However, the wording suggests that other mechanisms exist, without specifying what they are or under which circumstances they apply.
What you need to understand
Why does Google still emphasize 301s amidst the HTTPS boom?
Mueller's statement comes at a time when over 90% of indexed sites by Google are using HTTPS. One might think the issue is settled, but field reports show that many migrations still fail due to poor redirects.
The key point here: Google refers to signal transfer. This includes PageRank passed by backlinks, domain age, thematic relevance signals, and quality history. Without properly configured 301 redirects, each HTTPS URL is seen as new, wiping out years of optimization.
What is this URL-by-URL processing Mueller talks about?
Google references a scenario where the engine discovers HTTPS versions organically and progressively, without clear direction. In this case, each URL is evaluated independently: Googlebot crawls the new version, compares it with the old one, attempts to detect duplication, and then decides which version to index.
This process can take weeks or even months, depending on the site's size. During this time, both versions coexist in the index, leading to unpredictable ranking fluctuations. Backlinks pointing to HTTP continue to pass juice to URLs that will eventually be deindexed.
Are 301 redirects truly lossless in terms of PageRank?
Officially, Google has claimed for several years that 301s pass 100% of PageRank. But the on-the-ground reality is more complex. Some SEOs report temporary drops in traffic post-migration, even with flawless redirects.
The observed loss generally does not stem from the redirect itself but from overall algorithmic reprocessing: Google reevaluates the relevance of each page in its new HTTPS context, recalculates speed signals with the weight of the SSL certificate, and adjusts positioning based on these new parameters.
- 301 Redirects: the only official way to ensure a unified and controlled transfer of SEO signals during an HTTPS migration
- Organic Discovery: a slow and risky process where Google treats each URL individually, with risks of duplication and temporary traffic loss
- PageRank Transmission: theoretically full via 301s, but overall algorithmic reprocessing can cause positioning adjustments
- Critical Timing: the transfer speed directly depends on the quality of redirects and the frequency of site crawls
- External Backlinks: continue to point to HTTP if no redirects are in place, diluting authority across two competing versions
SEO Expert opinion
Is this recommendation still relevant in light of Google’s recent developments?
Mueller’s position aligns with field observations, but it overlooks a key point: Google can now automatically detect HTTPS migrations in many cases, particularly through sitemaps and canonical links. The Search Console has even flagged HTTP sites with security warnings for several years.
However, relying on this automatic detection remains a risky bet. Problematic cases regularly arise: sites losing 30 to 50% of their organic traffic for weeks because Google misinterpreted the migration, viewing HTTPS as a new competing site. 301 redirects eliminate this ambiguity.
What nuances should be added to this directive?
Mueller mentions “complete” migration, but not all sites need to fully transition to HTTPS. Some intentionally maintain HTTP sections for legitimate technical reasons, such as intranets or development environments. [To be verified]: Google has never clarified whether this intentional coexistence penalizes the site as a whole.
Another rarely discussed point: 301 redirects must point to strict equivalents page by page. Redirecting en masse to the HTTPS homepage is a common mistake that dilutes PageRank instead of transferring it effectively. Each HTTP URL should have its exact HTTPS counterpart, including the same URL structure.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
New sites launched directly in HTTPS obviously do not need redirects. But be careful: if you have previously communicated HTTP URLs during pre-launch or testing phases, these URLs may already be crawled and indexed. It’s necessary to check the Search Console.
Sites with mixed content (HTTP and HTTPS pages) must handle each case individually. Poorly documented partial migrations create canonicalization issues that Google does not always resolve as expected. If you are migrating in sections, ensure each section is self-contained and that internal links do not create HTTP/HTTPS loops.
Practical impact and recommendations
What practical steps should you take before migrating to HTTPS?
Before any migration, audit your current infrastructure. Ensure your server supports HTTP/2, that your SSL certificate covers all necessary subdomains (wildcard if needed), and that your CDNs or reverse proxies are set up to handle HTTPS without added latency. A poorly configured certificate can block the indexing of entire sections of the site.
Next, map all your HTTP URLs. Use Screaming Frog or Sitebulb to pull the complete list, including URL parameters and trailing slash variants. Each HTTP URL must have a defined HTTPS counterpart before the D-day. Omissions create 404 errors that break valuable backlinks.
How to set up 301 redirects to maximize PageRank transfer?
Redirects should be set up at the server level (Apache, Nginx, IIS), not via JavaScript or meta refresh. Google instantly follows server redirects, while other methods may be ignored or delayed. Set up a global rule that redirects all HTTP traffic to HTTPS while preserving the path and parameters.
Test each redirect with curl or a tool like Redirect Path. Ensure that the HTTP status code returned is 301, not 302 (temporary) or 307 (which does not transfer PageRank in the same way). A chain of redirects (HTTP → HTTPS → HTTPS with www) dilutes PageRank with each hop - limit to a single redirect per URL.
What mistakes should you avoid after the migration?
Never remove 301 redirects after a few weeks on the grounds that Google has indexed the new URLs. External backlinks continue to point to HTTP for years. Maintaining redirects ensures that this juice continues to flow to your site.
Monitor Search Console post-migration: Google flags SSL certificate issues, mixed content (HTTP resources loaded from HTTPS pages), and crawl errors related to HTTPS. Immediately correct any alerts. Mixed content can block the display of entire pages in some browsers, resulting in a catastrophic bounce rate.
- Install a valid SSL certificate covering all necessary subdomains before any migration
- Set up 301 redirects at the server level for each HTTP URL to its exact HTTPS equivalent
- Update all internal links to point directly to HTTPS, avoiding unnecessary redirects
- Submit a new HTTPS sitemap via Search Console and monitor the indexing of new URLs
- Check for any mixed content (HTTP resources loaded from HTTPS pages) using browser developer tools
- Maintain 301 redirects permanently to preserve juice from external backlinks pointing to HTTP
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Une redirection 302 peut-elle remplacer une 301 pour une migration HTTPS ?
Faut-il rediriger les anciennes URL HTTP même si elles n'ont jamais été indexées ?
Combien de temps faut-il pour que Google transfere tous les signaux apres une migration HTTPS ?
Les backlinks externes pointant vers HTTP perdent-ils de la valeur apres migration ?
Faut-il declarer la migration HTTPS dans la Search Console ?
🎥 From the same video 9
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 24/08/2018
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.