What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Google+ posts could appear on the homepage of Google News. Publishers were encouraged to post their articles there, as these posts could be displayed as recommended content.
25:50
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 51:25 💬 EN 📅 20/10/2014 ✂ 11 statements
Watch on YouTube (25:50) →
Other statements from this video 10
  1. 5:31 Comment le Google News Publisher Center permet-il vraiment de contrôler l'apparence de votre contenu dans Google News ?
  2. 9:38 Les sitemaps d'actualités sont-ils vraiment indispensables pour référencer vos articles de presse ?
  3. 15:05 Comment faire entrer votre site dans Google News sans vous planter ?
  4. 18:21 Le standout tag Google mérite-t-il encore votre attention en SEO ?
  5. 21:27 Comment utiliser le flux RSS Editors' Picks pour booster votre visibilité dans Google News ?
  6. 23:36 Comment les flux Editors' Picks par section transforment-ils la stratégie Google News ?
  7. 29:53 Google News : faut-il vraiment attribuer chaque citation pour éviter une pénalité ?
  8. 36:57 Comment Google gère-t-il vraiment les redirections 301 entre domaines distincts ?
  9. 66:40 Google Penguin : pourquoi Google synchronise-t-il ses mises à jour avec les périodes commerciales ?
  10. 72:27 Être dans Google News accélère-t-il vraiment le crawl de vos pages sur Google Search ?
📅
Official statement from (11 years ago)
TL;DR

Google once stated that Google+ posts could appear on the homepage of Google News and recommended publishers to post their articles there. This statement is completely outdated: Google+ has shut down and no longer exists. However, the lesson remains relevant: Google values content published on its own platforms and favors cross-service integration to distribute information.

What you need to understand

Why has this statement become outdated?

Google+ has ceased its operations for the general public, making this official recommendation completely inapplicable. Google's social platform, launched with ambition, never managed to compete with Facebook and was permanently shut down.

This statement illustrates a recurring pattern at Google: temporarily favoring its own services in search results. At the time, posting on Google+ provided an additional distribution channel to appear in Google News without going through the traditional inclusion criteria.

What was the mechanism behind this recommendation?

Google+ posts benefited from near-instant indexing and privileged exposure in certain sections of Google News. This integration allowed publishers to partially bypass traditional indexing delays.

The concept of recommended content mentioned by Stacie Chan suggested a distinct highlighting algorithm from the main feed. Google was then testing different ways to mix traditional editorial content with social content.

What lessons remain for current News SEO?

The shutdown of Google+ did not kill the underlying strategic approach. Google Discover has taken on some content recommendation features, with similar eligibility criteria.

Publishers optimizing for Google News must understand that diversifying entry points remains crucial. YouTube, Google Discover, and even Google My Business for local media now serve as the modern equivalents of this strategy.

  • Fast indexing remains a major competitive advantage for news content
  • Presence on Google platforms continues to influence visibility in the ecosystem
  • The Google News inclusion criteria are constantly evolving and require active monitoring
  • The notion of recommended content persists through Discover and featured snippets

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement reflect a strategic constant at Google?

Absolutely. Google has always sought to favor its own services in its results, sometimes at the expense of algorithmic neutrality. Google+ is the most glaring example, but we see the same pattern with YouTube, Google Maps, and Google Shopping.

Stacie Chan’s recommendation was clear and direct: use our platform to gain visibility. No ambiguity about the competitive advantage offered. This type of clarity is rare in Google's official communications, which generally prefer to discuss user experience rather than editorial advantages.

What nuances should be added to this approach?

The strategy of relying entirely on a Google platform carries a major risk of dependency. Publishers who heavily invested in Google+ lost that advantage overnight. [To be verified]: no compensation or automatic migration was offered during the shutdown.

The data on the actual impact of Google+ on Google News traffic is virtually non-existent publicly. Google never disclosed specific figures on the click volume generated through this channel. Therefore, it is impossible to retrospectively quantify the effectiveness of this recommendation.

In what cases does this logic still apply today?

For video publishers, YouTube provides a comparable leverage: fast indexing, presence in Google News via video tabs, and cross-recommendations. Optimized YouTube channels regularly appear in news carousels.

Google Discover operates under a similar logic: sites that meet its specific technical criteria (high-resolution images, schema.org Article markup, loading speed) benefit from privileged exposure. Same mechanism, different platform.

Warning: blindly replicating this strategy on current Google services without diversification exposes you to the risk of a sudden traffic loss in case of policy changes or service shutdown.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should news sites do concretely today?

Forget Google+, focus on Google Discover and Google News. Signing up for Google News Publisher Center remains essential, but optimizing for Discover can generate comparable or even higher traffic volumes.

Technical criteria are strict: images at least 1200px wide, complete Article schema.org markup with datePublished and dateModified, and impeccable Core Web Vitals. Without these foundations, there is no hope for significant exposure.

What errors should be avoided in News optimization?

Never duplicate content between different Google platforms hoping to multiply appearances. The algorithm detects duplicates and penalizes this practice. An article published on your site is sufficient if the markup is correct.

Also, avoid neglecting content freshness. Google News favors recent news: an article older than 48 hours has little chance of appearing in the main sections. Regular updates with modified dateModified can extend its lifespan.

How do you measure the effectiveness of your News strategy?

Google Search Console offers a specific Discover report that shows impressions and clicks. Utilize this data to identify formats and topics that perform well. The patterns are often counterintuitive.

For classic Google News, track the specific traffic source via UTM parameters or by segmenting news.google.com in Analytics. Compare bounce rates and session durations: News traffic is often less qualified than organic search traffic.

  • Register the site in Google News Publisher Center with all relevant sections
  • Implement schema.org Article and NewsArticle markup on all eligible content
  • Optimize images to reach at least 1200px in width with effective compression
  • Monitor Core Web Vitals specifically on article pages
  • Publish regularly with consistent frequency to maintain editorial freshness
  • Analyze Discover and News performances monthly in Search Console
Optimizing for Google News and Discover requires sharp technical expertise and constant monitoring of algorithmic changes. The challenges of structured markup, technical performance, and editorial strategy intersect in complex ways. For publishers looking to maximize their visibility in the Google news ecosystem, partnering with an SEO agency specialized in media can be crucial to identifying specific levers for your topic and avoiding costly visibility errors.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Google+ a-t-il vraiment apporté un avantage SEO mesurable aux éditeurs ?
Difficile à quantifier précisément, Google n'ayant jamais publié de données. Les retours terrain suggéraient une indexation plus rapide et quelques apparitions dans les sections recommandées, mais l'impact global restait marginal comparé aux critères éditoriaux classiques de Google News.
Quel service Google remplace aujourd'hui Google+ pour les éditeurs ?
Google Discover constitue le successeur le plus direct en termes de recommandation de contenu. Pour la distribution sociale, aucun remplacement officiel : les éditeurs doivent s'appuyer sur YouTube, Twitter et Facebook.
Les publications sur YouTube donnent-elles un avantage similaire dans Google News ?
Oui, partiellement. Les vidéos YouTube apparaissent dans les onglets vidéo de Google News et bénéficient d'une indexation prioritaire. Le format vidéo capte également plus d'espace visuel dans les SERP actualité.
Google Discover applique-t-il les mêmes critères d'éligibilité que Google News ?
Non, les critères diffèrent sensiblement. Discover privilégie l'engagement utilisateur et les images de qualité, tandis que Google News se concentre sur la fraîcheur éditoriale et l'autorité de la source. Un site peut être éligible à l'un sans l'autre.
Faut-il encore investir du temps dans l'optimisation Google News ?
Uniquement si vous produisez du contenu d'actualité régulier. Pour les sites institutionnels ou e-commerce sans dimension éditoriale forte, l'effort ne se justifie pas. Les médias et blogs d'actualité peuvent par contre générer 20 à 40% de leur trafic via News et Discover.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content Discover & News

🎥 From the same video 10

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 51 min · published on 20/10/2014

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.