What does Google say about SEO? /

Official statement

Linking a website to a mobile app through deep linking does not confer any direct positive ranking effect to the website. Simply creating links to quality content (app or otherwise) does not automatically enhance the ranking of the source site.
8:58
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 55:53 💬 EN 📅 24/07/2020 ✂ 53 statements
Watch on YouTube (8:58) →
Other statements from this video 52
  1. 0:33 Is it really enough to just have an alt attribute for your graphics and infographics?
  2. 1:04 Should you use alt text for infographics instead of converting them to HTML?
  3. 2:17 Is it really necessary to duplicate the text of infographics for Google to index them?
  4. 2:37 Do you really need to duplicate your infographics' content in text for Google?
  5. 3:41 Why can a site that steals your content rank better than you?
  6. 4:13 Why isn't optimizing a single SEO factor ever enough to outpace a competitor?
  7. 6:52 Is it really necessary to wait before reacting to ranking fluctuations?
  8. 6:52 Is it really necessary to wait for ranking fluctuations to stabilize before taking action?
  9. 8:58 Do outgoing links to authoritative sites really boost your Google ranking?
  10. 10:32 Site Restructuring: Why does Google recommend redirects over reverse proxy?
  11. 10:32 Is it true that Google advises against using reverse proxies for migrating from a subdomain to a subfolder?
  12. 12:03 Should you really invest in a reverse proxy to mask Google's hacking warnings?
  13. 13:03 Should you really invest in a reverse proxy to hide Google's hacking warnings?
  14. 13:50 Is it true that the highest number in Search Console is usually the right one?
  15. 14:44 Should you really put empty user profile pages on no-index?
  16. 14:44 Should you really set noindex for low-content user profile pages?
  17. 16:57 Do multiple redirect chains really hinder Google's crawling?
  18. 17:02 Are Multiple Redirect Chains Really Hurting Your SEO?
  19. 19:57 Do domain migrations and mergers really cause SEO penalties?
  20. 19:58 Could separating each step of a site migration save you weeks of SEO diagnostics?
  21. 23:04 Do pop-under ads really hurt your SEO rankings?
  22. 23:04 Do pop-under ads really penalize your organic SEO?
  23. 24:41 Should you overlook historical Mobile Usability errors in Search Console?
  24. 24:41 Should you ignore mobile errors in Search Console if the live test comes back clean?
  25. 25:50 Is it true that using nofollow on internal menu links can control PageRank?
  26. 25:50 Should you really nofollow your menu links to optimize crawling?
  27. 26:46 Do Google Ads scripts really slow down your site in the eyes of PageSpeed Insights?
  28. 27:06 Does Google Ads really penalize the speed of your pages in PageSpeed Insights?
  29. 29:28 Should you really aim for a perfect 100 on PageSpeed Insights to rank well?
  30. 29:28 Should you really aim for 100/100 on PageSpeed Insights to rank well?
  31. 35:45 Do image metadata really influence rankings in Google Images?
  32. 35:45 Can image metadata really enhance your SEO performance?
  33. 36:29 How many internal links per page should you have to optimize your structure without hindering crawl efficiency?
  34. 37:19 What is the optimal number of internal links per page for SEO?
  35. 37:54 Does a completely flat site structure really hurt SEO?
  36. 39:52 Should you still use disavow or has Google truly automated the ignoring of spam links?
  37. 40:02 Should you still disavow spammy links pointing to your site?
  38. 41:04 Does the FAQ schema work if the answers are hidden in an accordion?
  39. 41:04 Is it possible to mark a main page with FAQ schema, or is a dedicated page necessary?
  40. 41:59 Is it really necessary to have a dedicated page for each video to rank on Google?
  41. 41:59 Should you create a separate page for each video instead of grouping them together?
  42. 43:42 How does Google choose which sitelinks to display under your search results?
  43. 44:13 Does Google really control sitelinks through site structure?
  44. 45:19 Has PageRank really become a negligible ranking factor for Google?
  45. 45:19 Is PageRank still a top-ranking factor that you should keep an eye on?
  46. 46:46 Should you always use the Video Object schema for YouTube embeds subject to GDPR?
  47. 46:53 Do YouTube two-click embeds really hurt video SEO?
  48. 50:12 Are mobile interstitials truly all penalized by Google?
  49. 50:43 Is it really possible to show different interstitials based on traffic source without SEO risk?
  50. 52:08 Is it true that Google ignores GDPR interstitials without penalizing your SEO?
  51. 53:08 Can we truly measure the SEO impact of intrusive interstitials?
  52. 53:18 Do intrusive interstitials really have a measurable impact on your SEO?
📅
Official statement from (5 years ago)
TL;DR

Google clearly states that creating deep links from a website to a mobile app does not generate any direct positive ranking effect for the source site. Linking to quality content, whether in-app or elsewhere, does not automatically improve your ranking. For SEO, this means reassessing the mobile strategy: app linking is about UX and conversion, not organic ranking.

What you need to understand

What is deep linking and why is this question raised?

Deep linking allows for direct links from a website to specific screens of a mobile app. Instead of just opening the app at its homepage, the user lands directly on the targeted content — a product page, an article, a profile.

This technique became popular with the rise of mobile-first strategies. Many businesses have focused on native apps while keeping a traditional website. The natural question was: could linking the two environments via deep links transfer SEO juice, just like a standard internal link or a backlink?

Why did some SEOs think it could have a positive impact?

The idea was based on a analogy with traditional linking. If linking to external quality resources can enhance a page's credibility (and indirectly its thematic authority), then why wouldn't linking to one's own app — supposedly offering premium content — work in favor of the source site?

Some also observed that sites with active deep linking sometimes showed better engagement signals: longer session times, reduced bounce rates if the app was installed. It’s easy to deduce an SEO effect, even if correlation does not imply causation.

What does Mueller specifically say and what should be taken from it?

John Mueller is clear: no direct ranking effect. Simply creating links to quality content, whether an app or any other medium, does not improve the ranking of the site that is issuing the link.

This is an important clarification because it debunks a persistent misconception. Deep linking remains relevant for user experience, retention, and conversion — but it should not be integrated into an SEO strategy hoping for an organic ranking boost.

  • Deep linking is a UX/CRO element, not a direct SEO lever
  • Google does not transfer any ranking signals through these app/web links
  • Observed engagement improvements do not automatically translate to better ranking
  • Clearly separate SEO goals from mobile objectives in your roadmaps
  • No PageRank or equivalent value flows through a deep link

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?

Yes and no. On principle, Mueller's position holds: Google has never officially integrated mobile apps into its classic link graph. Deep links are not crawlable like web URLs, and they do not go through the same indexing pipeline.

However, we have seen cases where sites with well-implemented deep linking show better user engagement metrics — and these metrics can indirectly influence SEO. Less pogo-sticking, more time spent, higher conversion rates: all are behavioral signals that Google can pick up. [To verify]: Are these gains significant enough to impact the algorithm? No public study has irrefutably demonstrated this.

In what contexts does this rule deserve nuance?

If deep linking does not directly boost the source site's SEO, it can play a role in a hybrid content strategy. For example, an e-commerce marketplace offers exclusive content through its app (enhanced customer reviews, product videos, live chat). By redirecting mobile users to the app via deep link, it improves the post-click experience.

Now, a better experience can lead to positive indirect signals: increased completion rates for orders, reduced technical bounce rates (if the app is faster than the mobile site), more recurring sessions. These metrics, considered overall, can enhance the site's perceived quality in Google's eyes. But this is a domino effect, not a transfer of SEO juice in the classic sense.

What are the limits and gray areas of this statement?

Mueller speaks of “direct positive” effects. This qualification leaves room for indirect effects. And this is where it gets murky. If a site integrates deep links that massively enhance mobile engagement, and that engagement influences organic CTR or dwell time, then there is indeed an SEO impact — but mediated by user behavior.

Another gray area: App Indexing and other Firebase App Links features. Google has attempted for years to crawl and index content from Android apps. These initiatives have largely been abandoned or stripped of their substance, but some sites still have residual configurations. [To verify]: Can these dormant mechanisms still have a micro-effect? No one really knows.

Warning: Do not confuse deep linking with App Indexing. The latter allowed (in theory) app content to appear in mobile SERPs. But even this mechanism, when functioning, did not transfer ranking to the associated website. The two are distinct SEO dead ends.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you stop doing immediately?

Stop justifying development budgets for deep linking by citing SEO benefits. If your 2025 roadmap includes “implementing deep links to improve Google ranking,” rephrase it. Deep linking has its place in a mobile strategy, but from a UX, retention, conversion angle — not organic SEO.

A second common mistake: believing that multiplying links to the app from every page of the site will “dilute” or “waste” link juice. Wrong issue. These links do not consume anything in terms of internal PageRank, as they do not partake in the web link graph. You can add as many as UX justifies without fear of penalties or juice leakage.

How to reposition deep linking within your overall strategy?

Integrate deep linking into your mobile conversion funnel. If 60% of your organic traffic comes via mobile and your app offers a superior experience (faster checkout, push notifications, exclusive features), then the deep link becomes a CRO optimization tool, not an SEO one.

Measure the right KPIs: app open rates, action completion rates post-redirect, lifetime value of app vs. web users. Do not try to correlate these metrics with ranking variations — you’ll waste time. However, a 15% gain in mobile conversion rate easily justifies the technical investment.

What technical architecture should you favor if you have a website + an app?

Clearly separate indexable content (traditional website) from app-only content. If critical SEO content only exists in the app and not on the web, you have a problem: Google cannot crawl it, thus it does not contribute to your organic visibility.

Favor an approach where the website remains the source of truth for indexable content, and the app provides an enriched experience layer on top. Deep links then serve as a smooth bridge between the two, without creating invisible orphan content for search engines.

This type of hybrid architecture requires fine coordination between SEO, mobile dev, and product teams. When the mechanics become too complex, or if you lack internal resources, enlisting a specialized SEO agency can speed up implementation and avoid costly indexing or mobile performance errors.

  • Audit your content: everything strategic for SEO must exist in a crawlable web version
  • Never count on deep linking to improve your ranking — budget it for CRO/UX
  • Ensure your deep links do not lead to infinite redirects or dead ends for users without the app installed
  • Measure engagement app vs. web with dedicated analytics tools (Firebase, Adjust, Amplitude)
  • If you are still using App Indexing, assess whether it brings real value or if it can be disabled without impact
  • Clearly document the mobile strategy in your SEO playbook to avoid team confusion
Deep linking is not an SEO lever. Period. It improves mobile experience, streamlines the user journey, potentially boosts conversion — but does not transfer any ranking signals to the website. Reposition it in your CRO stack, measure the right KPIs, and stop looking for phantom correlations with your organic positions. If your strategic content only exists in the app, you have a gap in your SEO strategy, not a deep linking opportunity.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Un deep link vers mon app peut-il nuire au SEO de mon site web ?
Non. Google ne pénalise pas les liens sortants vers des apps mobiles. Ces liens ne consomment pas de PageRank interne et ne diluent pas votre jus SEO. Vous pouvez en placer autant que l'UX le justifie.
Si mon app offre du contenu exclusif, Google peut-il quand même l'indexer via deep linking ?
Non, sauf configuration spécifique via App Indexing (Android uniquement et largement obsolète). Le contenu app-only reste invisible pour les moteurs de recherche classiques. Si ce contenu est stratégique pour le SEO, il doit exister en version web crawlable.
Le deep linking peut-il améliorer mes Core Web Vitals en redirigeant les utilisateurs mobiles vers l'app ?
Indirectement, oui. Si votre app est plus rapide que votre site mobile, rediriger certains utilisateurs peut améliorer les métriques d'engagement. Mais cela ne change rien aux Core Web Vitals mesurés par Google sur le site web lui-même, qui restent calculés sur les vraies pages HTML.
Est-ce que les Universal Links (iOS) ou App Links (Android) ont un impact SEO différent des deep links classiques ?
Non. Ce sont des protocoles techniques pour améliorer la fluidité du handoff web-app, mais ils ne transfèrent aucun signal de ranking. Leur intérêt est purement UX : moins de friction, meilleur taux d'ouverture de l'app.
Google a-t-il déjà changé de position sur ce sujet par le passé ?
Google a expérimenté avec App Indexing et l'affichage de contenu app dans les SERP mobiles, mais n'a jamais affirmé que cela boostait le ranking du site web associé. La position de Mueller est cohérente avec l'historique officiel, même si certaines fonctionnalités ont été abandonnées en cours de route.
🏷 Related Topics
Content AI & SEO Links & Backlinks Mobile SEO

🎥 From the same video 52

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 55 min · published on 24/07/2020

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.