What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

If your site has well-defined sections, such as coupons and news, organize them in a way that keeps them separate for better algorithmic distinction and presentation in search results.
10:31
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 59:06 💬 EN 📅 16/10/2019 ✂ 20 statements
Watch on YouTube (10:31) →
Other statements from this video 19
  1. 1:38 Pourquoi les outils SEO et Google Analytics ne montrent-ils pas les mêmes impacts après une Core Update ?
  2. 1:38 Pourquoi les classements post-Core Update évoluent-ils à des vitesses différentes selon vos outils ?
  3. 2:39 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter de ses backlinks et utiliser le fichier disavow ?
  4. 2:39 Faut-il vraiment surveiller tous ses backlinks ou Google exagère-t-il le risque ?
  5. 4:10 Le contenu généré par les utilisateurs pèse-t-il vraiment autant que votre contenu éditorial aux yeux de Google ?
  6. 4:11 Le contenu généré par les utilisateurs est-il vraiment traité comme le contenu éditorial par Google ?
  7. 6:51 Faut-il vraiment utiliser noindex pour gérer la visibilité du contenu interne ?
  8. 6:51 Faut-il utiliser le noindex pour tester un contenu avant de l'indexer ?
  9. 6:57 Google a-t-il vraiment un algorithme YMYL spécifique pour la santé et la finance ?
  10. 9:05 Faut-il vraiment isoler les contenus sensibles dans des sous-domaines séparés ?
  11. 14:49 Le contenu white label nuit-il vraiment à votre indexation Google ?
  12. 22:02 Faut-il vraiment s'inscrire à Google News pour apparaître dans Discover ?
  13. 32:08 Comment Google News affiche-t-il les extraits de presse française sous la directive droit voisin ?
  14. 34:25 Comment optimiser pour Google Discover sans cibler de mots-clés ?
  15. 39:12 Google Discover privilégie-t-il vraiment la qualité sur le taux de clics ?
  16. 49:44 Faut-il vraiment utiliser le code 410 plutôt que le 404 pour accélérer la désindexation ?
  17. 53:59 404 ou 410 : Google fait-il vraiment la différence sur le long terme ?
  18. 54:00 Les balises canoniques locales peuvent-elles vraiment booster votre visibilité sans cannibalisation ?
  19. 57:38 Comment utiliser les balises canoniques pour éviter la cannibalisation entre vos contenus multi-localisations ?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google recommends clearly separating distinct sections of a site — coupons, news, blog — to facilitate algorithmic understanding and improve presentation in search results. In practical terms, this involves a watertight silo architecture and technical signals that differentiate these areas. The question remains how far to push this separation without fragmenting domain authority.

What you need to understand

Why does Google emphasize the separation of heterogeneous content?

Google's algorithms operate through pattern analysis and signals of thematic consistency. When a site mixes discount coupons, blog articles, product pages, and news in a flat or disorganized structure, the algorithm struggles to determine which part of the site deserves which visibility for which query.

The engine assigns a thematic identity to each section and assesses its relevance on a set of specific queries. If two sections cover radically different topics but share the same URL structure, template, or internal linking, Google may dilute their respective authority instead of treating them as two distinct entities.

What does Mueller mean by "separate organization" in practice?

It's not just about creating two folders /coupons/ and /news/ in the structure. The separation should be marked by clear technical signals: subdomains if the disjunction is radical, well-defined URL structures, different templates, distinct robots.txt files, or separate XML sitemaps.

Google must be able to assign each section to a specific thematic cluster and adjust its ranking criteria accordingly. Coupon pages can be evaluated on freshness and offer density, while blog articles will be judged on editorial depth and backlinks. Mixing these signals blurs algorithmic interpretation.

Is the presentation in search results really affected?

Yes, and this is a crucial point. Google offers rich snippets and specific display formats depending on the type of content: news cards, recipe carousels, coupon blocks with promo codes, etc. If your site mixes everything, the algorithm may hesitate to trigger these enriched displays.

A well-isolated section also allows Google to better understand user intents and display the right page for the right query. If a user is looking for a promo code, they don't want to land on a blog article that vaguely mentions an offer in passing.

  • Silo Architecture: each section should function as an autonomous entity with its own hierarchy
  • Distinct Technical Signals: templates, sitemaps, robots.txt, and possibly subdomains if the thematic disjunction is strong
  • Targeted Internal Linking: avoid linking all sections together if they have no thematic proximity
  • Display Formats: a clear separation promotes the activation of rich snippets specific to each type of content
  • Editorial Consistency: each section should have its own tone of voice and its own editorial KPIs

SEO Expert opinion

Is this recommendation really new or just a rephrasing of old practices?

Let's be honest: Mueller isn't breaking new ground here. The idea of separating thematic silos has been around since the 2000s and remains a cornerstone of any serious SEO architecture. What’s changing is that Google is finally publicly formalizing what was previously empirical observation.

The real challenge is that many corporate or media sites accumulate heterogeneous sections over time — a blog here, a partner space there, a wild promo area elsewhere — without ever reconsidering the overall architecture. And that’s where the problem lies: Google no longer makes exceptions for poorly organized sites. [To be verified] whether this recommendation applies equally to small sites (under 500 pages) or mainly concerns large multi-thematic portals.

How far should you push separation without fragmenting domain authority?

This is the million-dollar question. If you separate too much — for example, by creating a subdomain for each section — you risk diluting PageRank and losing the leverage of a strong single domain. Conversely, if you keep everything in the same root directory, you lose algorithmic clarity.

The answer depends on your content volume and domain authority. A site with a DR of 70+ can afford to create subdomains without much issue. A site with a DR of 30 will benefit from staying on a single domain but structuring its URLs rigorously. Internal linking then becomes the main tool to isolate or, conversely, strengthen the connections between sections.

What are the risks if we ignore Mueller's advice?

The main risk is a perceived relevance decrease by Google. If your site mixes everything, the algorithm may consider that you're an expert in nothing in particular. You then lose thematic authority, which directly impacts rankings on competitive queries.

Another risk: enriched display formats won't trigger. Google won't understand that one page is a coupon and another an article, so it displays both generically. You lose CTR and visibility in SERPs.

Warning: Don't undertake an architectural overhaul without a solid migration plan. Moving thousands of pages without proper 301 redirects can destroy your organic traffic for months. First, test on a limited section, measure the impact, then gradually roll out.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do to separate sections of a site?

Start with an audit of the existing structure. Map all sections of your site and identify those with no thematic links between them. If you have coupons, a blog, a press section, and a partner zone, ask yourself: does Google need to treat them as a single entity or as four distinct entities?

Then, define a clear URL structure for each section. For example: /blog/, /coupons/, /press/, /partners/. Ensure each section has its own XML sitemap and, if necessary, its own robots.txt file. If thematic disjunction is radical — for example, an e-commerce site with an integrated lifestyle magazine — consider a dedicated subdomain.

What mistakes should be avoided during implementation?

The classic mistake is to separate URLs but maintain an internal linking structure that connects everything to everything. If you want Google to understand that your coupons and blog are two distinct worlds, don’t systematically link between the two. Internal linking should be targeted and reflect the actual connections between contents.

Another trap: creating distinct sections without giving them their own editorial identity. If your blog and news section have exactly the same template, tone of voice, and authors, Google won't see a real difference. Each section must have its own coherence.

How can I check if my site respects this separation logic?

Use Google Search Console and analyze performance by directory. If you see that your coupon pages and blog articles appear for the same queries, that’s a bad sign. Each section should have its own keyword spectrum.

Also test the rich snippets with the structured data testing tool. If Google does not automatically detect that a page is a coupon or a blog article, the separation is not clear enough. Finally, monitor click-through rates in SERPs: a well-isolated and well-formatted section should have a higher CTR than the generic average.

  • Audit the current structure and identify heterogeneous sections
  • Define a clear and consistent URL structure per section
  • Create distinct XML sitemaps for each thematic block
  • Adjust internal linking to reflect the silos and avoid unnecessary links
  • Implement structured data specific to each type of content
  • Check in the Search Console that each section ranks for distinct queries
Separating the distinct sections of your site is not just a matter of cosmetic organization. It’s a strategy of algorithmic clarification that allows Google to better understand your site and display each page for the right queries. If your current architecture is a multi-thematic mess, you lose perceived authority and visibility. These optimizations may seem simple on paper, but their technical implementation — redirections, template overhauls, linking adjustments — requires sharp expertise. To avoid costly mistakes and maximize impact, hiring a specialized SEO agency can be a prudent investment: personalized support ensures a clean and measurable transition.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Dois-je créer un sous-domaine pour chaque section distincte de mon site ?
Pas forcément. Un sous-domaine est pertinent si la disjonction thématique est radicale et que tu veux isoler complètement l'autorité. Pour la plupart des cas, une structure d'URL en répertoires bien séparés suffit.
Le maillage interne entre sections différentes nuit-il au SEO ?
Oui, si ces liens sont systématiques et sans cohérence thématique. Google interprète le maillage interne comme un signal de proximité sémantique. Lier des coupons à un blog sans raison dilue ce signal.
Comment savoir si Google considère mes sections comme distinctes ?
Vérifie dans la Search Console les performances par répertoire. Si chaque section rank sur des requêtes spécifiques et différentes, c'est bon signe. Si elles se cannibalisent, c'est que la séparation n'est pas claire.
Les sitemaps XML séparés sont-ils obligatoires pour chaque section ?
Non, mais c'est une bonne pratique. Un sitemap dédié par section permet à Google de mieux crawler et indexer en fonction du type de contenu. Cela facilite aussi le suivi dans la Search Console.
Cette recommandation s'applique-t-elle aussi aux petits sites de moins de 100 pages ?
Moins critique, mais toujours utile. Si tu as trois sections thématiquement éloignées, autant les séparer proprement. Même sur un petit site, la clarté aide Google à comprendre ton positionnement.
🏷 Related Topics
Algorithms Content

🎥 From the same video 19

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 59 min · published on 16/10/2019

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.