Official statement
Other statements from this video 8 ▾
- 0:31 Rel=canonical vs 301 : pourquoi Google traite-t-il ces deux signaux différemment ?
- 3:15 L'âge du domaine a-t-il vraiment un impact sur votre référencement ?
- 6:35 Les redirections 301 en cascade pénalisent-elles vraiment votre classement ?
- 7:38 Le comportement utilisateur influence-t-il vraiment le classement Google ?
- 12:14 Pourquoi vos pages mobiles apparaissent-elles dans les résultats desktop ?
- 15:58 Comment Google gère-t-il automatiquement les erreurs de sécurité et malwares détectés sur votre site ?
- 21:03 Faut-il vraiment utiliser des 404 plutôt que rediriger les contenus expirés vers une catégorie ?
- 36:20 Pourquoi bloquer CSS et JavaScript peut tuer votre référencement mobile ?
Google states that moving from HTTP to HTTPS does not require a formal address change declaration in Search Console, contrary to a domain change. You only need to add the new HTTPS property and configure 301 redirects. This technical distinction simplifies the process but raises questions about the speed of signal transfer between the two versions of the site.
What you need to understand
Why does Google differentiate between HTTPS migration and domain change?
The HTTPS migration keeps the same domain name, only the protocol changes. Google views this as a technical evolution of the same site rather than a move to a new address. Thus, the engine treats both versions as variations of the same entity.
In contrast, a domain change involves a completely new digital identity. The address change tool becomes necessary to expedite the transfer of ranking signals and explicitly inform Google of the definitive switch.
What happens technically during an HTTPS migration?
When you add the HTTPS property in Search Console, Google starts to crawl and index this new version alongside the old one. Permanent 301 redirects signal to the bot that each HTTP URL now has an HTTPS counterpart.
The engine gradually consolidates the ranking signals: backlinks, content history, engagement metrics. This process usually takes a few weeks, depending on crawl frequency and site size. No additional manual intervention is required through the address change tool.
What is the concrete difference for SEO?
Without a formal address change declaration, Google follows an automatic process based on redirects and the natural discovery of HTTPS URLs. This approach works perfectly for most sites but may slightly extend the transition period.
The lack of an explicit notification means that the engine must independently identify the migration pattern. On sites with thousands of pages, some HTTP URLs may temporarily remain indexed alongside their HTTPS counterparts, creating a transitory duplication without significant negative impact.
- Mandatory addition of the HTTPS property as a distinct entity in Search Console
- Permanently 301 redirects of all HTTP URLs to HTTPS required
- Automatic consolidation of signals without manual intervention via the migration tool
- Transition period of a few weeks for complete metric transfer
- Monitoring required of both properties during the transition phase
SEO Expert opinion
Does this simplified approach hide potential pitfalls?
Mueller's statement presents the HTTPS migration as a smooth and automatic process. In reality, this apparent simplicity often conceals technical complications that SEOs frequently encounter. Sites with complex architectures, multiple subdomains, or dynamic URL parameters often experience issues.
The real problem is that Google never specifies the exact timeframe for signal consolidation. Field observations show significant discrepancies, ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months depending on the sites. This variability depends on crawl budget, domain authority, and the quality of redirects. [To verify]: no official documentation accurately quantifies these durations.
Is it really necessary to create a separate Search Console property?
Google insists on adding the HTTPS version as a distinct property, which seems counterintuitive since no formal address change is declared. This recommendation makes sense: it allows for separate monitoring of both versions during the transition and quickly identifies URLs that are not redirecting correctly.
Some practitioners use a domain-type property (domain-prefixed property) that automatically aggregates HTTP and HTTPS. This approach works but reduces the granularity of diagnostics during migration. Mueller's advice remains relevant for sites needing precise tracking of each step.
Do observations contradict this statement?
Practice shows that some sites indeed benefit from a visible acceleration when using the address change tool for an HTTPS migration, despite Google's claims. This empirical finding suggests that the automatic process is not always optimal, particularly for large sites.
Google does not officially recognize this nuance. Feedback indicates that a manual declaration may reduce the period of indexed duplication and accelerate the transfer of PageRank. [To verify]: no official confirmation from Google on this point, which remains undocumented empirical observation.
Practical impact and recommendations
What technical procedure should you actually apply?
The first step is to properly configure the SSL certificate across the entire site, including subdomains and CDNs if applicable. Test the HTTPS accessibility of all critical sections before making any changes in Search Console. A partial SSL setup creates mixed content errors that hinder indexing.
Next, add the new HTTPS property in Search Console as a separate entity. Verify the property using your preferred method (DNS, HTML file, meta tag). This step allows Google to begin discovering and indexing the secure version alongside the old HTTP version.
What critical errors should you absolutely avoid?
The most common mistake: implementing temporary 302 redirects instead of permanent 301 redirects. Google interprets 302 as a temporary situation and does not transfer ranking signals. This confusion significantly prolongs migration and dilutes authority between the two versions.
Another recurring pitfall: forgetting to update the canonical URLs and hreflang tags that still point to the HTTP versions. These contradictory signals create confusion for the engine. Also, verify that the XML sitemap exclusively references HTTPS URLs and that no internal links point to the old version.
How can you effectively monitor the transition?
Monitor both Search Console properties daily during the first 4 weeks. Compare the number of indexed pages: the HTTPS version should gradually increase while HTTP decreases. Stagnation or significant divergence signals a crawling or redirect issue.
Also analyze the average positions and organic traffic via Google Analytics. A sudden drop often indicates technical errors (redirect chains, invalid certificate, content blocked in HTTPS). Slight fluctuations are normal for 2-3 weeks while Google reevaluates each URL.
- Install a valid SSL certificate covering all necessary subdomains
- Configure permanent 301 redirects from each HTTP URL to its HTTPS equivalent
- Add the HTTPS property in Search Console as a distinct entity and verify it
- Update all XML sitemaps to reference only HTTPS URLs
- Correct canonicals and hreflang to point to secure versions
- Monitor the evolution of indexed pages on both properties for at least 4 weeks
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Dois-je supprimer l'ancienne propriété HTTP de Search Console après la migration ?
Les backlinks pointant vers HTTP perdent-ils leur valeur après la migration ?
Combien de temps dure réellement la consolidation complète des signaux ?
Faut-il forcer HTTPS via HSTS dès le début de la migration ?
Peut-on migrer progressivement en HTTPS section par section ?
🎥 From the same video 8
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 16/12/2014
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.