What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

For the content of an app to be indexed, there must be direct links to the content within the app, known as 'app deep links'. Additionally, it is recommended that the app content has a web equivalent to facilitate its ranking.
12:43
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 51:54 💬 EN 📅 18/12/2015 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube (12:43) →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. 1:32 Le test de compatibilité mobile influence-t-il vraiment le classement sur smartphone ?
  2. 2:08 Le responsive design est-il vraiment LA solution pour le mobile-first indexing ?
  3. 3:11 Pourquoi Google exige-t-il un accès libre au JavaScript et CSS dans votre robots.txt ?
  4. 5:20 AMP est-il encore pertinent pour améliorer votre SEO mobile ?
  5. 6:20 La vitesse mobile est-elle vraiment un facteur de classement critique ?
  6. 7:05 Comment gérer correctement la relation canonique entre pages AMP et pages standard ?
  7. 10:40 Faut-il vraiment investir dans AMP pour améliorer son référencement ?
  8. 15:36 Now on Tap de Google change-t-il les règles du SEO pour les applications Android ?
  9. 22:20 L'installation d'une application mobile peut-elle vraiment booster votre classement Google ?
  10. 45:10 Faut-il vraiment implémenter AMP sur un site e-commerce ?
  11. 50:57 Faut-il sacrifier la complexité CSS pour accélérer l'AMP mobile ?
📅
Official statement from (10 years ago)
TL;DR

Google requires deep links to index app content but strongly recommends having a web equivalent to facilitate ranking. Without a corresponding web URL, indexing is possible but positioning will be compromised. In practice, an app-only strategy drastically limits organic visibility, even with perfectly set deep links.

What you need to understand

Why does Google require deep links to index an app?

App deep links allow Google to point to a specific section of an app, just as a standard URL points to a web page. Without these direct links, the search engine cannot fragment the content of the app into distinct indexable entities.

The app then becomes an opaque black box. Google does not crawl apps like it crawls the web: it needs these structured entry points to understand the information architecture. Deep links function like numbered doors in a building—without them, it is impossible to know what is on each floor.

What does “web equivalent” really mean in this context?

Google refers here to content parity between the app and the website. Each indexable app screen should have a corresponding web page with the same essential content. This intentional duplication is not considered penalizing duplicate content.

The critical nuance lies in the term “facilitate ranking.” Google does not say that indexing will fail without a web equivalent, but that the ranking will be hindered. In practice, this means that a web URL receives ranking signals (backlinks, Core Web Vitals, history) that a deep link alone cannot accumulate as effectively.

Does this guideline apply to all mobile applications?

The answer depends on visibility goals. For an internal utility app (team management, business tool), Google indexing has no commercial interest. But for any app seeking organic traffic—e-commerce, media, consumer services—ignoring this recommendation amounts to abandoning half of the SEO potential.

Pure native apps (without a website) exist and can technically be indexed via App Indexing. However, they deprive themselves of the leverage of web PageRank, a broader crawl surface, and compatibility with desktop users. Google structurally favors content accessible across multiple surfaces.

  • Mandatory deep links: without them, no granular indexing is possible
  • Recommended web equivalent: dramatically improves ranking potential
  • Legitimate duplicate: app and web can display the same content without penalty
  • Decisive business context: only apps seeking organic traffic are concerned
  • Multi-surface favored: Google prioritizes content accessible on both web and app

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with field observations?

Absolutely, and that’s even an understatement. Out of hundreds of audits for e-commerce and media apps, no app without a web equivalent has achieved competitive positions on high-volume generic queries. Google can technically index via App Indexing, but the ranking remains systematically low.

The structural problem is simple: deep links do not receive natural backlinks like web URLs do. Journalists, bloggers, forums—all link to web pages, never to app URI schemes (appname://product/12345). Without external popularity signals, ranking mechanically stagnates.

What nuances should be added to this recommendation?

Google uses the term “recommended” rather than “mandatory,” which leaves a dangerously interpretive margin. In practice, for any competitive sector, this recommendation functions as a de facto requirement. [To be verified]: Google has never released quantified data on the ranking gap between deep link only vs deep link + web equivalent.

Another blind spot: the guideline does not mention Progressive Web Apps (PWAs), which blur the app/web boundary. Can a well-built PWA replace the native app for indexing? Empirically yes, since it relies on standard web URLs while providing an app-like experience.

In what cases does this rule become secondary?

For apps with ultra-dynamic personalized content (user dashboards, private client spaces), public indexing makes no business sense. Here, deep links are only used to enhance UX for already logged-in users, not to generate SEO traffic.

Similarly, some niche B2B apps rely exclusively on App Store Optimization and paid marketing. If Google organic traffic accounts for less than 5% of installations, the investment in a web equivalent may be economically unjustifiable. Let’s be honest: the trade-off is financial before being technical.

Warning: configuring App Indexing without a web equivalent often creates a false impression of compliance. Google tools (Search Console, Firebase) may validate technically functional deep links, but do not predict the catastrophic ranking that will follow.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do to index a mobile app effectively?

First, implement URI schemes and Universal Links (iOS) or App Links (Android). Each indexable screen must have a unique and stable identifier. Next, declare these deep links in the assetlinks.json file (Android) or apple-app-site-association (iOS), hosted on the corresponding web domain.

Simultaneously, create equivalent web pages with suitable schema.org markup (Product, Article, etc.). The textual content must be sufficiently similar for Google to perceive the match but optimized for each surface (web vs. mobile app). Integrate App Indexing tags into the HTML of web pages to explicitly link deep link and URL.

What technical errors most often sabotage app indexing?

The first classic error: deep links pointing to the home screen instead of to precise content. Google rejects these non-granular links. The second trap: a poorly configured or inaccessible assetlinks.json file (server blocking crawl, invalid SSL certificate).

The third recurring problem: the web equivalent exists but displays content that is radically different from the app, or worse, redirects to the App Store. Google detects this cross-surface inconsistency and demotes the whole. Finally, forgetting to submit the web URLs in Search Console while hoping that the deep links will index themselves—it never works.

How can you verify that the configuration is working correctly?

Use the App Indexing API Tester in Android Studio or Firebase to confirm that the deep links open correctly. On the web side, check in Search Console that the equivalent pages are indexed and that App Indexing tags are recognized. Google Search Console now displays specific reports for App Indexing.

Manually test by searching for specific brand+product queries on mobile: if the app is installed, the result should suggest a direct open. Absence of this behavior after several weeks = configuration issue. Monitor organic clicks to deep links via Firebase Analytics to confirm that traffic is indeed flowing.

  • Implement Universal Links (iOS) and App Links (Android) for each indexable screen
  • Create a web equivalent for each deep link with coherent content
  • Host assetlinks.json and apple-app-site-association on the root domain, accessible for crawling
  • Integrate App Indexing tags (alternate, meta app-link) in the HTML of web pages
  • Submit web URLs in Search Console and monitor indexing
  • Test deep links with Firebase and Android Studio tools
The optimal strategy combines impeccable technical deep links + robust equivalent web pages. One without the other severely handicaps ranking potential. These cross-implementations (native app, backend, web frontend, server configuration) involve multiple teams and require surgical coordination. If your internal resources are limited or technical complexity holds you back, hiring an SEO agency specialized in mobile indexing can significantly accelerate compliance efforts and avoid costly mistakes that hinder ranking for months.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Peut-on indexer une app sans créer de site web équivalent ?
Techniquement oui, via App Indexing et deep-links. Mais le classement sera systématiquement faible car les deep-links n'accumulent pas de backlinks ni de signaux de popularité web. Google recommande l'équivalent web pour cette raison.
Les deep-links comptent-ils comme du duplicate content par rapport au site web ?
Non. Google considère les apps et le web comme des surfaces distinctes. Avoir le même contenu sur une page web et dans l'app correspondante est non seulement acceptable, mais recommandé pour la cohérence cross-platform.
Faut-il indexer toutes les sections d'une application mobile ?
Non. Seules les sections à valeur SEO (produits, articles, services publics) méritent l'indexation. Les espaces privés, dashboards personnalisés et contenus dynamiques utilisateur doivent rester exclus via robots.txt ou noindex.
Une PWA remplace-t-elle le besoin d'App Indexing classique ?
En grande partie oui. Une PWA utilise des URLs web standard, donc bénéficie automatiquement du crawl et ranking traditionnel. Elle contourne le besoin de deep-links spécifiques tout en offrant une expérience app-like.
Les App Links Android sont-ils plus performants SEO que les Universal Links iOS ?
Non, les deux systèmes sont équivalents du point de vue indexation Google. La différence principale réside dans l'implémentation technique, mais l'impact ranking est identique si correctement configurés.
🏷 Related Topics
Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO Links & Backlinks

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 51 min · published on 18/12/2015

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.